Greg Hearn , Nisar Ahmed Channa , Gian Luca Casali
{"title":"When socio-technical imaginaries meet the reality of adoption: Cobots in manufacturing","authors":"Greg Hearn , Nisar Ahmed Channa , Gian Luca Casali","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By the time a new technology is adopted, it has been significantly influenced by the socio-technical imaginaries that inspired its development. For Cobots, the juxtaposition of the imaginaries with the realities for workforces is starkest at the point of adoption. However, as the diffusion of Cobots is relatively new, there is a lack of empirical research on how Cobots will affect the future workforce and the potential implications of Cobots for industries. Given this, we adopted the Gioia methodological approach to conduct a qualitative content analysis of online news articles, blogs, viewpoints, vlogs, and interviews with pioneers in Cobotics technology published on different websites. This resulted in four themes: Cobot diffusion and Commercial Rationales; Applications of Cobots Across the Industries; Cobots and Future Employment Landscape; and Implications for Manufacturing Work. We then developed high level composite socio-technical narratives implied in the corpus <em>vis</em> Efficiency, Skills, Safety, Wellbeing, Resilience, Change Management. By comparing these narratives with extant empirical studies of Cobot adoption in manufacturing, we conclude that the current dominant sociotechnical narrative for Cobot adoption in manufacturing is simple automation. It is efficiency driven at the level of firm, and substitutive rather than collaborative at the level of work task.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 103596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
By the time a new technology is adopted, it has been significantly influenced by the socio-technical imaginaries that inspired its development. For Cobots, the juxtaposition of the imaginaries with the realities for workforces is starkest at the point of adoption. However, as the diffusion of Cobots is relatively new, there is a lack of empirical research on how Cobots will affect the future workforce and the potential implications of Cobots for industries. Given this, we adopted the Gioia methodological approach to conduct a qualitative content analysis of online news articles, blogs, viewpoints, vlogs, and interviews with pioneers in Cobotics technology published on different websites. This resulted in four themes: Cobot diffusion and Commercial Rationales; Applications of Cobots Across the Industries; Cobots and Future Employment Landscape; and Implications for Manufacturing Work. We then developed high level composite socio-technical narratives implied in the corpus vis Efficiency, Skills, Safety, Wellbeing, Resilience, Change Management. By comparing these narratives with extant empirical studies of Cobot adoption in manufacturing, we conclude that the current dominant sociotechnical narrative for Cobot adoption in manufacturing is simple automation. It is efficiency driven at the level of firm, and substitutive rather than collaborative at the level of work task.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures