Charles Bogue Luffman, Ina Higgins, and science at the Burnley School of horticulture in Melbourne, Australia, 1891–1919

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Sandra E. Pullman
{"title":"Charles Bogue Luffman, Ina Higgins, and science at the Burnley School of horticulture in Melbourne, Australia, 1891–1919","authors":"Sandra E. Pullman","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2025.100994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This appraisal investigates the development of scientifically based horticultural education in Australia. At the end of the nineteenth century, the discipline of horticulture underwent a major shift from a craft-based occupation to a scientific-based profession. Within this context, two Australian horticultural pioneers emerged—Charles Bogue Luffman (1862–1920) and Ina Higgins (1860–1948). Both are considered in the context of being connected to Australia’s first horticultural college opening in 1891, the Burnley School of Horticultural. This appraisal discusses the Victorian Colonial Government progressive attitude to horticultural education to addressed the lack of skills and knowledge of orchardists and the introduction of women students. The appraisal’s analysis investigates the models of curriculum used and discusses whether there were any intercolonial connections to other British colonies. Through the historiography of literature, the appraisal shows that new interest in Higgins and Luffman has emerged especially in garden design and employment for women nevertheless horticultural education still lags. And finally, the new information presented discusses why horticultural was more progressive than agriculture and acknowledges there were prejudices towards education women in the rural industries. This including exposing banning women from 1909 to 1911 was not gender based but financial and Burnley’s connection with the women’s movement of Victoria overcame this banning hurdle. Presented throughout the appraisal is the contribution Higgins and Luffman made individually and together.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51032,"journal":{"name":"Endeavour","volume":"49 2","pages":"Article 100994"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endeavour","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932725000171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This appraisal investigates the development of scientifically based horticultural education in Australia. At the end of the nineteenth century, the discipline of horticulture underwent a major shift from a craft-based occupation to a scientific-based profession. Within this context, two Australian horticultural pioneers emerged—Charles Bogue Luffman (1862–1920) and Ina Higgins (1860–1948). Both are considered in the context of being connected to Australia’s first horticultural college opening in 1891, the Burnley School of Horticultural. This appraisal discusses the Victorian Colonial Government progressive attitude to horticultural education to addressed the lack of skills and knowledge of orchardists and the introduction of women students. The appraisal’s analysis investigates the models of curriculum used and discusses whether there were any intercolonial connections to other British colonies. Through the historiography of literature, the appraisal shows that new interest in Higgins and Luffman has emerged especially in garden design and employment for women nevertheless horticultural education still lags. And finally, the new information presented discusses why horticultural was more progressive than agriculture and acknowledges there were prejudices towards education women in the rural industries. This including exposing banning women from 1909 to 1911 was not gender based but financial and Burnley’s connection with the women’s movement of Victoria overcame this banning hurdle. Presented throughout the appraisal is the contribution Higgins and Luffman made individually and together.
1891-1919年,澳大利亚墨尔本伯恩利园艺学校的查尔斯·博格·拉夫曼、伊娜·希金斯和科学
本评价调查了澳大利亚以科学为基础的园艺教育的发展。19世纪末,园艺学经历了一次重大转变,从一个以工艺为基础的职业转变为一个以科学为基础的职业。在这种背景下,出现了两位澳大利亚园艺先驱——查尔斯·博格·卢夫曼(charles Bogue Luffman, 1862-1920)和伊娜·希金斯(Ina Higgins, 1860-1948)。两者都被认为与1891年澳大利亚第一所园艺学院伯恩利园艺学院有关。本评价讨论了维多利亚殖民政府对园艺教育的进步态度,以解决园艺师缺乏技能和知识的问题,并引入了女学生。评估的分析调查了所使用的课程模式,并讨论了是否与其他英国殖民地有任何殖民地间的联系。通过文学史学,评估表明,对希金斯和卢夫曼的新兴趣已经出现,特别是在园林设计和妇女就业方面,然而园艺教育仍然滞后。最后,提出的新信息讨论了为什么园艺比农业更进步,并承认在农村工业中存在对受教育妇女的偏见。这包括揭露从1909年到1911年禁止女性不是基于性别,而是经济上的,伯恩利与维多利亚妇女运动的联系克服了这一禁令的障碍。贯穿整个评价的是希金斯和卢夫曼各自和共同做出的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endeavour
Endeavour 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Endeavour, established in 1942, has, over its long and proud history, developed into one of the leading journals in the history and philosophy of science. Endeavour publishes high-quality articles on a wide array of scientific topics from ancient to modern, across all disciplines. It serves as a critical forum for the interdisciplinary exploration and evaluation of natural knowledge and its development throughout history. Each issue contains lavish color and black-and-white illustrations. This makes Endeavour an ideal destination for history and philosophy of science articles with a strong visual component. Endeavour presents the history and philosophy of science in a clear and accessible manner, ensuring the journal is a valuable tool for historians, philosophers, practicing scientists, and general readers. To enable it to have the broadest coverage possible, Endeavour features four types of articles: -Research articles are concise, fully referenced, and beautifully illustrated with high quality reproductions of the most important source material. -In Vivo articles will illustrate the rich and numerous connections between historical and philosophical scholarship and matters of current public interest, and provide rich, readable explanations of important current events from historical and philosophical perspectives. -Book Reviews and Commentaries provide a picture of the rapidly growing history of science discipline. Written by both established and emerging scholars, our reviews provide a vibrant overview of the latest publications and media in the history and philosophy of science. -Lost and Found Pieces are playful and creative short essays which focus on objects, theories, tools, and methods that have been significant to science but underappreciated by collective memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信