Risk of exacerbations, hospitalisation, and mortality in adults with physician-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with normal spirometry and adults with preserved ratio impaired spirometry in Sweden: retrospective analysis of data from a nationwide cohort study

IF 13.6 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Oskar Wallström , Caroline Stridsman , Helena Backman , Sigrid Vikjord , Anne Lindberg , Fredrik Nyberg , Lowie E.G.W. Vanfleteren
{"title":"Risk of exacerbations, hospitalisation, and mortality in adults with physician-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with normal spirometry and adults with preserved ratio impaired spirometry in Sweden: retrospective analysis of data from a nationwide cohort study","authors":"Oskar Wallström ,&nbsp;Caroline Stridsman ,&nbsp;Helena Backman ,&nbsp;Sigrid Vikjord ,&nbsp;Anne Lindberg ,&nbsp;Fredrik Nyberg ,&nbsp;Lowie E.G.W. Vanfleteren","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physician diagnosed COPD with normal spirometry (dnsCOPD) (sometimes labeled pre-COPD) and Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) has been studied in population-based cohorts, but not in physician diagnosed COPD (dCOPD) patients from routine clinical practice. The Swedish National Airway Register (SNAR) is a large nationwide register including data from dCOPD patients from over 1000 clinics across all regions of Sweden and is representative of the COPD care in Sweden. We aimed to identify and characterize patients with dnsCOPD, PRISm and spirometrically confirmed COPD (sCOPD) from dCOPD patients in SNAR, stratify them further according to symptoms and exacerbations risk using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A/B/E classification, and assess differences in risk for exacerbations, cause-specific hospitalisations and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled patients aged ≥30 years with dCOPD in the SNAR from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2022 with complete spirometry i.e., postbronchodilator values for both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (index date). Patients with concomitant asthma were excluded. Patients were stratified into dnsCOPD (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ≥0.7 and FEV<sub>1</sub> ≥80% predicted), PRISm (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ≥0.7 and FEV<sub>1</sub> &lt;80% predicted) and sCOPD (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC &lt;0.7). Further substratification was based on GOLD A/B/E (A: COPD assessment test (CAT) score &lt;10 points and &lt;2 moderate, 0 severe exacerbations within 1 year before the index date, B: CAT-score ≥10 points and &lt;2 moderate, 0 severe exacerbations, E: ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation(s)). Patients were followed until 31 November 2022. Competing risk regression was used to calculate subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR)s with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for exacerbation, hospitalisation and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 45,653 patients with dCOPD, 5.4% had dnsCOPD, 11.4% had PRISm and 83.3% had sCOPD. Smoking history was similar between groups (ever smoker: dnsCOPD: 79% PRISm: 82% sCOPD: 86%) and inhalation therapy was common in all groups (any inhaler: 75%, 80% and 80%, triple combination: 22%, 28% and 35%). Patients with PRISm had a high prevalence of obesity (dnsCOPD: 30%, PRISm: 43%, COPD: 22%), cardiovascular disease (dnsCOPD: 39%, PRISm: 48%, COPD: 41%) and diabetes (dnsCOPD: 10%, PRISm: 17%, COPD: 9%). Baseline GOLD group B or E were highly prevalent in dnsCOPD (B: 54%, E: 11%), PRISm (B: 59%, E: 14%), as well as in COPD (B: 54%, E: 17%). DnsCOPD and PRISm patients had lower risk of exacerbations (SHR 0.69, 95%CI 0.64–0.74 and 0.85, 95%CI 0.81–0.89), respiratory hospitalisation (0.40, 95%CI 0.34–0.46 and 0.68, 95%CI 0.62–0.73), and respiratory mortality (0.22, 95%CI 0.13–0.37 and 0.60, 95%CI 0.48–0.75) compared to sCOPD. Cardiovascular mortality was lower in dnsCOPD (0.41, 95%CI 0.19–0.86), but similar in PRISm (0.73, 95%CI 0.49–1.08) compared to sCOPD. The A/B/E classification was predictive for all outcomes in dnsCOPD and PRISm. DnsCOPD and PRISm group E patients had higher risks for all outcomes than sCOPD group A or B.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>DnsCOPD and PRISm are prevalent in a real-life cohort of patients with a physician diagnosis of COPD. These patients are symptomatic, might suffer from exacerbations and are commonly treated with inhaled therapy, equally to sCOPD. Patients with PRISm had a high prevalence of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. DnsCOPD and PRISm had generally lower overall risks of exacerbation or respiratory events, although PRISm patients showed similar cardiovascular risk to sCOPD. The A/B/E classification predicted future events, even in dnsCOPD and PRISm patients.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study is performed with support from The <span>Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation</span> (<span><span>20200150</span></span>) and the Swedish government and country council <span>ALF</span> grant (<span><span>ALFGBG-824371</span></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101322"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776225001140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Physician diagnosed COPD with normal spirometry (dnsCOPD) (sometimes labeled pre-COPD) and Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) has been studied in population-based cohorts, but not in physician diagnosed COPD (dCOPD) patients from routine clinical practice. The Swedish National Airway Register (SNAR) is a large nationwide register including data from dCOPD patients from over 1000 clinics across all regions of Sweden and is representative of the COPD care in Sweden. We aimed to identify and characterize patients with dnsCOPD, PRISm and spirometrically confirmed COPD (sCOPD) from dCOPD patients in SNAR, stratify them further according to symptoms and exacerbations risk using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A/B/E classification, and assess differences in risk for exacerbations, cause-specific hospitalisations and mortality.

Methods

We enrolled patients aged ≥30 years with dCOPD in the SNAR from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2022 with complete spirometry i.e., postbronchodilator values for both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (index date). Patients with concomitant asthma were excluded. Patients were stratified into dnsCOPD (FEV1/FVC ≥0.7 and FEV1 ≥80% predicted), PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥0.7 and FEV1 <80% predicted) and sCOPD (FEV1/FVC <0.7). Further substratification was based on GOLD A/B/E (A: COPD assessment test (CAT) score <10 points and <2 moderate, 0 severe exacerbations within 1 year before the index date, B: CAT-score ≥10 points and <2 moderate, 0 severe exacerbations, E: ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation(s)). Patients were followed until 31 November 2022. Competing risk regression was used to calculate subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR)s with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for exacerbation, hospitalisation and mortality.

Findings

Of 45,653 patients with dCOPD, 5.4% had dnsCOPD, 11.4% had PRISm and 83.3% had sCOPD. Smoking history was similar between groups (ever smoker: dnsCOPD: 79% PRISm: 82% sCOPD: 86%) and inhalation therapy was common in all groups (any inhaler: 75%, 80% and 80%, triple combination: 22%, 28% and 35%). Patients with PRISm had a high prevalence of obesity (dnsCOPD: 30%, PRISm: 43%, COPD: 22%), cardiovascular disease (dnsCOPD: 39%, PRISm: 48%, COPD: 41%) and diabetes (dnsCOPD: 10%, PRISm: 17%, COPD: 9%). Baseline GOLD group B or E were highly prevalent in dnsCOPD (B: 54%, E: 11%), PRISm (B: 59%, E: 14%), as well as in COPD (B: 54%, E: 17%). DnsCOPD and PRISm patients had lower risk of exacerbations (SHR 0.69, 95%CI 0.64–0.74 and 0.85, 95%CI 0.81–0.89), respiratory hospitalisation (0.40, 95%CI 0.34–0.46 and 0.68, 95%CI 0.62–0.73), and respiratory mortality (0.22, 95%CI 0.13–0.37 and 0.60, 95%CI 0.48–0.75) compared to sCOPD. Cardiovascular mortality was lower in dnsCOPD (0.41, 95%CI 0.19–0.86), but similar in PRISm (0.73, 95%CI 0.49–1.08) compared to sCOPD. The A/B/E classification was predictive for all outcomes in dnsCOPD and PRISm. DnsCOPD and PRISm group E patients had higher risks for all outcomes than sCOPD group A or B.

Interpretation

DnsCOPD and PRISm are prevalent in a real-life cohort of patients with a physician diagnosis of COPD. These patients are symptomatic, might suffer from exacerbations and are commonly treated with inhaled therapy, equally to sCOPD. Patients with PRISm had a high prevalence of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. DnsCOPD and PRISm had generally lower overall risks of exacerbation or respiratory events, although PRISm patients showed similar cardiovascular risk to sCOPD. The A/B/E classification predicted future events, even in dnsCOPD and PRISm patients.

Funding

This study is performed with support from The Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (20200150) and the Swedish government and country council ALF grant (ALFGBG-824371).
瑞典医生诊断的肺活量正常的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和肺活量保留率受损的成年人的恶化、住院和死亡风险:来自全国队列研究数据的回顾性分析
医生诊断为COPD的正常肺活量测定法(dnsCOPD)(有时标记为COPD前期)和保留比例受损肺活量测定法(PRISm)已经在基于人群的队列中进行了研究,但没有在常规临床实践中医生诊断为COPD (dCOPD)的患者中进行研究。瑞典国家气道登记(SNAR)是一个大型的全国性登记,包括来自瑞典所有地区1000多家诊所的慢性阻塞性肺病患者的数据,是瑞典慢性阻塞性肺病护理的代表。我们旨在从SNAR的dCOPD患者中识别和表征dnsCOPD、PRISm和肺活量测定确诊的COPD (sCOPD)患者,使用全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD) A/B/E分类,根据症状和加重风险对他们进行进一步分层,并评估加重风险、原因特异性住院和死亡率的差异。方法纳入2014年1月1日至2022年6月30日SNAR中年龄≥30岁的dCOPD患者,并进行完整的肺活量测定,即支气管扩张剂后1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和用力肺活量(FVC)(指数日期)。排除伴有哮喘的患者。将患者分为dnsCOPD (FEV1/FVC≥0.7,FEV1≥80%预测)、PRISm (FEV1/FVC≥0.7,FEV1 <;80%预测)和sCOPD (FEV1/FVC <0.7)。进一步的分层基于GOLD A/B/E (A: COPD评估试验(CAT)评分10分,2次中度,0次重度加重,B: CAT评分≥10分,2次中度,0次重度加重,E:≥2次中度或≥1次重度加重)。患者随访至2022年11月31日。竞争风险回归用于计算急性加重、住院和死亡率的亚分布风险比(SHR), 95%置信区间(ci)。结果45,653例dCOPD患者中,5.4%为dnsCOPD, 11.4%为PRISm, 83.3%为sCOPD。两组之间吸烟史相似(曾经吸烟者:dnsCOPD: 79% PRISm: 82% sCOPD: 86%),吸入治疗在所有组中都很常见(任何吸入器:75%,80%和80%,三联用药:22%,28%和35%)。PRISm患者肥胖(dnsCOPD: 30%, PRISm: 43%, COPD: 22%)、心血管疾病(dnsCOPD: 39%, PRISm: 48%, COPD: 41%)和糖尿病(dnsCOPD: 10%, PRISm: 17%, COPD: 9%)的患病率较高。基线GOLD B组或E组在dnsCOPD (B: 54%, E: 11%), PRISm (B: 59%, E: 14%)以及COPD (B: 54%, E: 17%)中高度流行。与sCOPD相比,DnsCOPD和PRISm患者的恶化风险(SHR 0.69, 95%CI 0.64-0.74和0.85,95%CI 0.81-0.89)、呼吸住院(0.40,95%CI 0.34-0.46和0.68,95%CI 0.62-0.73)和呼吸死亡率(0.22,95%CI 0.13-0.37和0.60,95%CI 0.48-0.75)较低。与sCOPD相比,dnsCOPD组心血管死亡率较低(0.41,95%CI 0.19-0.86),但PRISm组相似(0.73,95%CI 0.49-1.08)。A/B/E分型对dnsCOPD和PRISm的所有结果均具有预测性。DnsCOPD和PRISm E组患者的所有结局风险均高于sCOPD A组或b组。解释DnsCOPD和PRISm在医生诊断为COPD的现实生活患者队列中普遍存在。这些患者有症状,可能会加重病情,通常采用吸入治疗,与sCOPD治疗相同。PRISm患者有较高的肥胖、糖尿病和心血管疾病患病率。尽管PRISm患者的心血管风险与sCOPD相似,但DnsCOPD和PRISm患者的恶化或呼吸事件总体风险较低。A/B/E分类预测未来事件,即使在dnsCOPD和PRISm患者中也是如此。本研究得到了瑞典心肺基金会(20200150)和瑞典政府和国家委员会ALF资助(ALFGBG-824371)的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
260
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, a gold open access journal, is part of The Lancet's global effort to promote healthcare quality and accessibility worldwide. It focuses on advancing clinical practice and health policy in the European region to enhance health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating changes in clinical practice and health policy. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces on regional health topics, such as infection and disease prevention, healthy aging, and reducing health disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信