Analysis of equine-specific undergraduate courses and competitive team opportunities across American colleges and universities

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
E.A. Greene , L.M. Luck , T. Williams , K.D. Bump , R.K. Splan
{"title":"Analysis of equine-specific undergraduate courses and competitive team opportunities across American colleges and universities","authors":"E.A. Greene ,&nbsp;L.M. Luck ,&nbsp;T. Williams ,&nbsp;K.D. Bump ,&nbsp;R.K. Splan","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Equine education plays a vital role in shaping the next generation of professionals in a thriving and dynamic industry. However, opportunities for undergraduates seeking equine-specific academic or athletic experiences may differ widely from institution to institution. This study analyzed the availability of equine-specific courses and competitive teams offered at colleges and universities across the United States. A dataset containing information on institution type, equine-specific course offerings, and equine competitive team opportunities was compiled from publicly available Internet resources, including the Equine Education Network, collegiate equestrian organizations, institution course catalogs, and the US Department of Education. Data were summarized via descriptive statistics and the number of equine-specific courses and team opportunities were compared across institution types using nonparametric tests. A total of 555 schools (220 public 4-year, 218 private 4-year, 116 public 2-year, and 1 private 2-year) were found to offer 3,113 equine-specific courses and 912 equine-related team opportunities. Among schools that offered equine-specific courses (n = 255, or 46.0%), the most common course categories were equine science and/or management (30.3% of all courses), riding and/or driving (21.6%), and training and/or instruction (15.5%). Four-year private institutions offered a greater median number of equestrian (i.e., riding, driving, and/or training) classes than 4-year public institutions (<em>P</em> = 0.04), with 2-year schools offering an intermediate median number of courses that was not significantly different from that of other institution types (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.2). No differences were found between institution types in the median number of total (<em>P</em> = 0.40) or nonequestrian courses (e.g., equine science, management, business; <em>P</em> = 0.28) offered. Among schools that offered equine-specific team opportunities (n = 509, or 91.7%), the most prevalent intercollegiate teams offered were hunt and/or stock seat (77.6% of schools), followed by rodeo (26.3%), dressage (13.8%), polo (7.3%), eventing (5.5%), horse judging (5.5%), stock horse (5.3%), colt-starting (1.2%), and mule packing (1.0%) teams. As expected, there were regional variations in the availability of equine offerings, with the highest concentrations in states with greater equine populations. These findings contribute to a better understanding of equine educational resources nationwide and can be used to inform strategic planning for student recruitment, engagement, and workforce preparation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 105440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073708062500098X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equine education plays a vital role in shaping the next generation of professionals in a thriving and dynamic industry. However, opportunities for undergraduates seeking equine-specific academic or athletic experiences may differ widely from institution to institution. This study analyzed the availability of equine-specific courses and competitive teams offered at colleges and universities across the United States. A dataset containing information on institution type, equine-specific course offerings, and equine competitive team opportunities was compiled from publicly available Internet resources, including the Equine Education Network, collegiate equestrian organizations, institution course catalogs, and the US Department of Education. Data were summarized via descriptive statistics and the number of equine-specific courses and team opportunities were compared across institution types using nonparametric tests. A total of 555 schools (220 public 4-year, 218 private 4-year, 116 public 2-year, and 1 private 2-year) were found to offer 3,113 equine-specific courses and 912 equine-related team opportunities. Among schools that offered equine-specific courses (n = 255, or 46.0%), the most common course categories were equine science and/or management (30.3% of all courses), riding and/or driving (21.6%), and training and/or instruction (15.5%). Four-year private institutions offered a greater median number of equestrian (i.e., riding, driving, and/or training) classes than 4-year public institutions (P = 0.04), with 2-year schools offering an intermediate median number of courses that was not significantly different from that of other institution types (P > 0.2). No differences were found between institution types in the median number of total (P = 0.40) or nonequestrian courses (e.g., equine science, management, business; P = 0.28) offered. Among schools that offered equine-specific team opportunities (n = 509, or 91.7%), the most prevalent intercollegiate teams offered were hunt and/or stock seat (77.6% of schools), followed by rodeo (26.3%), dressage (13.8%), polo (7.3%), eventing (5.5%), horse judging (5.5%), stock horse (5.3%), colt-starting (1.2%), and mule packing (1.0%) teams. As expected, there were regional variations in the availability of equine offerings, with the highest concentrations in states with greater equine populations. These findings contribute to a better understanding of equine educational resources nationwide and can be used to inform strategic planning for student recruitment, engagement, and workforce preparation.
美国高校马类专业本科课程及团队竞争机会分析
在一个蓬勃发展和充满活力的行业中,马术教育在塑造下一代专业人士方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,本科生寻求与马相关的学术或运动经验的机会可能因机构而异。这项研究分析了美国各高校提供的专门针对马的课程和竞争团队的可用性。包含机构类型信息的数据集,马特定的课程提供,和马竞争团队机会从公开可用的互联网资源编译,包括马教育网络,大学马术组织,机构课程目录,和教育的美国部门。通过描述性统计总结数据,并使用非参数检验比较不同机构类型的马专用课程和团队机会的数量。共有555所学校(公立四年制学校220所,私立四年制学校218所,公立两年制学校116所,私立两年制学校1所)提供3113门与马有关的课程和912个与马有关的团队机会。在提供马类课程的学校(n = 255,或46.0%)中,最常见的课程类别是马科学和/或管理(占所有课程的30.3%)、骑马和/或驾驶(21.6%)和训练和/或指导(15.5%)。四年制私立院校提供的马术(即骑马、驾驶及/或训练)课程中位数高于四年制公立院校(P = 0.04),两年制学校提供的课程中位数居中,与其他院校类型没有显著差异(P >;0.2)。机构类型之间在总课程中位数(P = 0.40)或非马术课程(如马术科学、管理、商业; = 0.28页)。在提供马类团队机会的学校中(n = 509,或91.7%),最常见的校际团队是狩猎和/或家畜座位(77.6%的学校),其次是牛仔竞技(26.3%),盛装舞步(13.8%),马球(7.3%),三项赛(5.5%),马匹裁判(5.5%),家畜马(5.3%),小马出发(1.2%)和骡子驮(1.0%)团队。正如预期的那样,马产品的可获得性存在区域差异,在马种群较多的州浓度最高。这些发现有助于更好地了解全国马术教育资源,并可用于为学生招生、参与和劳动力准备提供战略规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (JEVS) is an international publication designed for the practicing equine veterinarian, equine researcher, and other equine health care specialist. Published monthly, each issue of JEVS includes original research, reviews, case reports, short communications, and clinical techniques from leaders in the equine veterinary field, covering such topics as laminitis, reproduction, infectious disease, parasitology, behavior, podology, internal medicine, surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信