Oral Antithrombotic Medication Is Associated with Improved Visual Outcomes in Eyes with Submacular Hemorrhage from Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hemal P. Patel MD, Cason B. Robbins MD, Jamie J. Karl MD, Peter Weng MD, PhD, Lejla Vajzovic MD, FASRS, Sharon Fekrat MD, FASRS
{"title":"Oral Antithrombotic Medication Is Associated with Improved Visual Outcomes in Eyes with Submacular Hemorrhage from Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration","authors":"Hemal P. Patel MD,&nbsp;Cason B. Robbins MD,&nbsp;Jamie J. Karl MD,&nbsp;Peter Weng MD, PhD,&nbsp;Lejla Vajzovic MD, FASRS,&nbsp;Sharon Fekrat MD, FASRS","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine differences in visual acuity (VA) outcomes in eyes of patients on antithrombotics (antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants) that develop submacular hemorrhage (SMH) compared with eyes of patients who are not on antithrombotics and develop SMH.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A retrospective study of patients presenting with fovea-involving SMH due to wet age-related macular degeneration over an 8-year period who had ≥6 months of follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Demographics, VA at presentation and final follow-up after SMH management, and history of any antithrombotic therapy were collected. Patients were grouped based on whether they were on anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin), antiplatelet agents (P2Y12 inhibitors, aspirin, or both), or neither.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multivariate generalized estimating equations were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The difference between VA at presentation with SMH and VA at final follow-up was compared between patients taking oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents and those not on any antithrombotic agent.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-seven eyes of 74 patients were included. Twenty were on oral anticoagulants, 38 were on antiplatelet agents, and 22 were on neither. After controlling for age, sex, post-SMH cataract surgery, time to presentation, treatments received, initial VA, and follow-up duration, patients taking oral anticoagulants had greater improvement in VA at final follow-up compared with patients who were not taking a concurrent antithrombotic agent (<em>P</em> = 0.001); however, patients on oral antiplatelets did not (<em>P</em> = 0.09). After additionally controlling for the initial size and thickness of SMH, patients taking oral anticoagulants and patients taking oral antiplatelets had greater improvement in VA at final follow-up compared with patients who were not taking an antithrombotic (<em>P</em> = 0.002 and <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients taking oral anticoagulants who then develop an SMH may have better long-term VA outcomes than those who were not. However, this effect was not seen in patients taking oral antiplatelet medications. This suggests that baseline anticoagulants may be associated with improved VA outcomes in eyes that develop an SMH. When controlling for size and thickness of SMH, patients taking oral anticoagulants and those taking oral antiplatelets had better long-term VA outcomes than those who were not, suggesting a potential mitigating effect of oral antithrombotics.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 5","pages":"Article 100796"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525000946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine differences in visual acuity (VA) outcomes in eyes of patients on antithrombotics (antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants) that develop submacular hemorrhage (SMH) compared with eyes of patients who are not on antithrombotics and develop SMH.

Design

A retrospective study of patients presenting with fovea-involving SMH due to wet age-related macular degeneration over an 8-year period who had ≥6 months of follow-up.

Subjects

Demographics, VA at presentation and final follow-up after SMH management, and history of any antithrombotic therapy were collected. Patients were grouped based on whether they were on anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin), antiplatelet agents (P2Y12 inhibitors, aspirin, or both), or neither.

Methods

Multivariate generalized estimating equations were used for statistical analysis.

Main Outcome Measures

The difference between VA at presentation with SMH and VA at final follow-up was compared between patients taking oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents and those not on any antithrombotic agent.

Results

Seventy-seven eyes of 74 patients were included. Twenty were on oral anticoagulants, 38 were on antiplatelet agents, and 22 were on neither. After controlling for age, sex, post-SMH cataract surgery, time to presentation, treatments received, initial VA, and follow-up duration, patients taking oral anticoagulants had greater improvement in VA at final follow-up compared with patients who were not taking a concurrent antithrombotic agent (P = 0.001); however, patients on oral antiplatelets did not (P = 0.09). After additionally controlling for the initial size and thickness of SMH, patients taking oral anticoagulants and patients taking oral antiplatelets had greater improvement in VA at final follow-up compared with patients who were not taking an antithrombotic (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients taking oral anticoagulants who then develop an SMH may have better long-term VA outcomes than those who were not. However, this effect was not seen in patients taking oral antiplatelet medications. This suggests that baseline anticoagulants may be associated with improved VA outcomes in eyes that develop an SMH. When controlling for size and thickness of SMH, patients taking oral anticoagulants and those taking oral antiplatelets had better long-term VA outcomes than those who were not, suggesting a potential mitigating effect of oral antithrombotics.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
口服抗血栓药物与湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性引起的黄斑下出血患者的视力改善有关
目的探讨抗血栓药物(抗血小板药物和抗凝药物)发生黄斑下出血(SMH)患者的视力(VA)结果与未使用抗血栓药物并发生SMH的患者的眼睛的差异。设计:对年龄相关性黄斑变性导致的累及中央窝的SMH患者进行回顾性研究,随访时间超过8年,随访时间≥6个月。收集受试者的人口统计资料、入院时的VA和SMH治疗后的最后随访,以及任何抗血栓治疗的历史。患者根据是否使用抗凝药物(直接口服抗凝药物或华法林)、抗血小板药物(P2Y12抑制剂、阿司匹林或两者都使用)或不使用进行分组。方法采用多元广义估计方程进行统计分析。主要观察指标:比较服用口服抗凝或抗血小板药物和未服用任何抗血栓药物的患者出现SMH时的VA和最终随访时的VA的差异。结果纳入74例患者77只眼。20人服用口服抗凝剂,38人服用抗血小板药物,22人两者都不服用。在控制年龄、性别、smh术后白内障手术、就诊时间、接受的治疗、初始VA和随访时间后,服用口服抗凝药物的患者在最终随访时VA的改善大于未同时服用抗血栓药物的患者(P = 0.001);而口服抗血小板药物的患者则没有(P = 0.09)。在进一步控制SMH的初始大小和厚度后,口服抗凝药物和口服抗血小板药物的患者与未服用抗血栓药物的患者相比,在最终随访时VA的改善更大(P = 0.002和P <;分别为0.001)。结论口服抗凝剂后发生SMH的患者可能比未服用抗凝剂的患者有更好的长期VA预后。然而,在服用口服抗血小板药物的患者中没有观察到这种效果。这表明基线抗凝剂可能与发生SMH的眼睛的VA结果改善有关。在控制SMH的大小和厚度时,服用口服抗凝药物和口服抗血小板药物的患者比不服用的患者有更好的长期VA结果,这表明口服抗血栓药物有潜在的缓解作用。财务披露专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信