Impacts of rider skill level and weekly riding frequency on western riders’ identification of asymmetry

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
E. Jolley, A. Higgins, A. Logan
{"title":"Impacts of rider skill level and weekly riding frequency on western riders’ identification of asymmetry","authors":"E. Jolley,&nbsp;A. Higgins,&nbsp;A. Logan","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asymmetry of stirrup length has been found to impact rider symmetry and can influence rider position. Rider experience also has an influence on symmetry and position, with advanced riders more symmetric and vertically aligned compared with novice. To gain better insight to the understanding of rider asymmetry, a unique approach was performed by evaluating the rider's perception of induced asymmetry while riding in western tack. This study aimed to determine if novice and advanced riders could detect stirrup asymmetry in the same frequency while blinded to treatment. It was hypothesized advanced riders would detect asymmetric stirrups in greater frequency. Utilizing 10 stock-type university horses and 10 (5 advanced, 5 novice) university riders, participants tested specified stirrup treatments over 2 data collection days, with each rider riding the same horse twice. The order of the treatments was randomized, one ride having symmetric stirrups and the other asymmetric (one stirrup shortened by 10 cm). To blind riders to treatment, an equipment fit-check was performed to determine appropriate stirrup length, riders then dismounted and left the arena, allowing for stirrups to be adjusted via a randomized assignment. During this adjustment time, riders were instructed that their horses were being prepared for research, to aid in treatment blinding. Riders returned and remounted, performing a short riding pattern at the walk and trot, with directional changes. To confirm pattern completion, accuracy, and breaks of gait, all rides were videotaped. At the completion of the pattern for both rides, riders were asked to take a survey via Qualtrics, answering questions about their riding experience, the horse they rode, how often they rode per week, and any notes regarding asymmetry in their stirrup and rein length. Data were analyzed with a FREQ procedure in SAS 9. Similar amounts of advanced (60%) and novice (50%) riders correctly identified their stirrups. However, regardless of experience level, 70% of those riding more than 5 h per week and 50% of those riding 1–2 h per week correctly identified their stirrups as symmetric or asymmetric. Additionally, 100% of those riding 2–3, 3–4, and more than 5 h per week performed their pattern correctly, with only 67% of those riding 1–2 h per week doing so. Thus, weekly riding frequency may have an impact on asymmetry identification, not just riding experience. A rider's perception of asymmetry is of interest to the field of equitation science, and hours an individual rides per week may be a contributing factor to rider skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 105458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080625001169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asymmetry of stirrup length has been found to impact rider symmetry and can influence rider position. Rider experience also has an influence on symmetry and position, with advanced riders more symmetric and vertically aligned compared with novice. To gain better insight to the understanding of rider asymmetry, a unique approach was performed by evaluating the rider's perception of induced asymmetry while riding in western tack. This study aimed to determine if novice and advanced riders could detect stirrup asymmetry in the same frequency while blinded to treatment. It was hypothesized advanced riders would detect asymmetric stirrups in greater frequency. Utilizing 10 stock-type university horses and 10 (5 advanced, 5 novice) university riders, participants tested specified stirrup treatments over 2 data collection days, with each rider riding the same horse twice. The order of the treatments was randomized, one ride having symmetric stirrups and the other asymmetric (one stirrup shortened by 10 cm). To blind riders to treatment, an equipment fit-check was performed to determine appropriate stirrup length, riders then dismounted and left the arena, allowing for stirrups to be adjusted via a randomized assignment. During this adjustment time, riders were instructed that their horses were being prepared for research, to aid in treatment blinding. Riders returned and remounted, performing a short riding pattern at the walk and trot, with directional changes. To confirm pattern completion, accuracy, and breaks of gait, all rides were videotaped. At the completion of the pattern for both rides, riders were asked to take a survey via Qualtrics, answering questions about their riding experience, the horse they rode, how often they rode per week, and any notes regarding asymmetry in their stirrup and rein length. Data were analyzed with a FREQ procedure in SAS 9. Similar amounts of advanced (60%) and novice (50%) riders correctly identified their stirrups. However, regardless of experience level, 70% of those riding more than 5 h per week and 50% of those riding 1–2 h per week correctly identified their stirrups as symmetric or asymmetric. Additionally, 100% of those riding 2–3, 3–4, and more than 5 h per week performed their pattern correctly, with only 67% of those riding 1–2 h per week doing so. Thus, weekly riding frequency may have an impact on asymmetry identification, not just riding experience. A rider's perception of asymmetry is of interest to the field of equitation science, and hours an individual rides per week may be a contributing factor to rider skills.
骑手技术水平和每周骑行次数对西方骑手不对称辨识的影响
马镫长度的不对称影响骑手的对称性,影响骑手的位置。骑手经验对对称性和位置也有影响,与新手相比,高级骑手更加对称和垂直对齐。为了更好地理解骑手的不对称性,我们采用了一种独特的方法来评估骑手在骑西马时对诱导不对称性的感知。这项研究旨在确定新手和高级骑手在盲法治疗下是否能以相同的频率检测到马镫不对称。据推测,高级骑手会更频繁地发现不对称的马镫。参与者使用10匹家畜型大学马和10名(5名高级骑手,5名新手)大学骑手,在2个数据收集天内测试指定的马镫处理方法,每个骑手骑同一匹马两次。处理顺序是随机的,一个骑有对称的马镫,另一个骑有不对称的马镫(一个马镫缩短了10厘米)。为了让骑手盲目接受治疗,进行了设备适配检查,以确定合适的马镫长度,然后骑手下马并离开竞技场,允许通过随机分配调整马镫。在这段调整时间里,骑手们被告知他们的马正在为研究做准备,以帮助盲法治疗。骑手返回并重新上马,以步行和小跑的方式进行短途骑行,并改变方向。为了确认模式的完成、准确性和步态的中断,所有的骑行都被录像。在完成两次骑行的模式后,骑手们被要求通过Qualtrics进行一项调查,回答有关他们的骑行经历、他们骑的马、他们每周骑行的频率以及他们的马镫和缰绳长度不对称的任何注意事项。数据用SAS 9的FREQ程序分析。高级骑手(60%)和新手骑手(50%)正确识别马镫的比例相近。然而,无论经验水平如何,70%的人每周骑5小时以上,50%的人每周骑1-2小时,正确地识别出他们的马镫是对称的还是不对称的。此外,100%的每周骑2-3、3-4和5小时以上的人正确地完成了他们的模式,而每周骑1-2小时的人中只有67%的人这样做。因此,每周骑行频率可能会影响不对称识别,而不仅仅是骑行经验。骑手对不对称的感知是马术科学领域的兴趣所在,每周个人骑行的小时数可能是骑手技能的一个贡献因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (JEVS) is an international publication designed for the practicing equine veterinarian, equine researcher, and other equine health care specialist. Published monthly, each issue of JEVS includes original research, reviews, case reports, short communications, and clinical techniques from leaders in the equine veterinary field, covering such topics as laminitis, reproduction, infectious disease, parasitology, behavior, podology, internal medicine, surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信