Comparing the survivability of various probiotic strains through the pelleting process

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
R. Jacobs, D. Ayala, K. Dunmire, M.E. Gordon
{"title":"Comparing the survivability of various probiotic strains through the pelleting process","authors":"R. Jacobs,&nbsp;D. Ayala,&nbsp;K. Dunmire,&nbsp;M.E. Gordon","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widely accepted definition for probiotics specifies that they are “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host.” The specific reference to “live microorganisms” is of paramount importance when discussing the efficacy of these bacteria. Commonly, equine feeds and supplements that contain claimed probiotics are provided to the horse in a pelleted form, which are produced utilizing high temperatures, pressures, and moisture via steam addition, which are all factors known to inactivate certain bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the post-pelleting survivability of a selection of bacteria with proposed probiotic properties. Four bacteria commonly used in equine probiotic supplements were obtained (<em>Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus casei</em>, and <em>Bifidobacterium longum</em>; Waseen Inc.). A fifth bacterium of interest was also evaluated (<em>Bacillus coagulans</em> GBI-30, 6086; Kerry). Identical alfalfa-based premixes were prepared with a targeted concentration of 1.13 × 10<sup>9</sup> cfu/kg of each bacterium. Premixes were mixed utilizing a ribbon mixer and pelleted using a 100-hp dual-speed pellet mill (CPM, model 2S) using a 5/32-inch pellet die at a rate of 54.5 kg/min and a conditioning temperature of 85 C. Two samples (25 g) of each pre- and post-pelleting feed sample was added to 225 mL of buffered peptone water (BPW). To evaluate the viability of <em>B. coagulans</em> GBI-30, 6086, <em>E. faecium, B. longum, L. casei</em>, and <em>L. reuteri</em>, samples were homogenized in a stomacher at 230 rpm for 2 min, diluted on BPW, and plated in selective media. Plates were then incubated at respective conditions for 24 to 48 h: Luria–Bertani 42°C; brain heart infusion 42°C; de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) 37°C anaerobically; and MRS 37°C aerobically. Plates with 25 to 250 colonies were counted and results recorded as log<sub>10</sub> cfu per gram. Data were analyzed via ANOVA using a MIXED procedure (SAS 9.4). Pre- and post-pelleting data are presented in Table 1. Taken together, these data demonstrate that a selection of bacteria commonly used in equine feeds and supplements do not meet the definition of probiotic when provided in a pelleted form. In addition, this type of research can act as a screening tool to determine which probiotics should be the subject of additional physiological research in horses. <em>Bacillus coagulans</em> GBI-30, 6086 is a unique sporeforming bacterium which survives pelleting, enabling it to function as a probiotic in the horse.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 105516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080625001741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widely accepted definition for probiotics specifies that they are “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host.” The specific reference to “live microorganisms” is of paramount importance when discussing the efficacy of these bacteria. Commonly, equine feeds and supplements that contain claimed probiotics are provided to the horse in a pelleted form, which are produced utilizing high temperatures, pressures, and moisture via steam addition, which are all factors known to inactivate certain bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the post-pelleting survivability of a selection of bacteria with proposed probiotic properties. Four bacteria commonly used in equine probiotic supplements were obtained (Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium longum; Waseen Inc.). A fifth bacterium of interest was also evaluated (Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086; Kerry). Identical alfalfa-based premixes were prepared with a targeted concentration of 1.13 × 109 cfu/kg of each bacterium. Premixes were mixed utilizing a ribbon mixer and pelleted using a 100-hp dual-speed pellet mill (CPM, model 2S) using a 5/32-inch pellet die at a rate of 54.5 kg/min and a conditioning temperature of 85 C. Two samples (25 g) of each pre- and post-pelleting feed sample was added to 225 mL of buffered peptone water (BPW). To evaluate the viability of B. coagulans GBI-30, 6086, E. faecium, B. longum, L. casei, and L. reuteri, samples were homogenized in a stomacher at 230 rpm for 2 min, diluted on BPW, and plated in selective media. Plates were then incubated at respective conditions for 24 to 48 h: Luria–Bertani 42°C; brain heart infusion 42°C; de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) 37°C anaerobically; and MRS 37°C aerobically. Plates with 25 to 250 colonies were counted and results recorded as log10 cfu per gram. Data were analyzed via ANOVA using a MIXED procedure (SAS 9.4). Pre- and post-pelleting data are presented in Table 1. Taken together, these data demonstrate that a selection of bacteria commonly used in equine feeds and supplements do not meet the definition of probiotic when provided in a pelleted form. In addition, this type of research can act as a screening tool to determine which probiotics should be the subject of additional physiological research in horses. Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 is a unique sporeforming bacterium which survives pelleting, enabling it to function as a probiotic in the horse.
比较不同益生菌在造粒过程中的生存能力
益生菌被广泛接受的定义是,它们是“活的微生物,当给予足够的量时,对宿主的健康有益。”在讨论这些细菌的功效时,具体提到“活微生物”是至关重要的。通常,含有益生菌的马饲料和补充剂以颗粒形式提供给马,这些颗粒是利用高温,压力和通过蒸汽添加的水分生产的,这些都是已知的灭活某些细菌的因素。本研究的目的是评估具有益生菌特性的精选细菌在造粒后的生存能力。获得了马益生菌补充剂中常用的四种细菌(屎肠球菌、罗伊氏乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌和长双歧杆菌;Waseen Inc .)。第五种感兴趣的细菌也被评估(Bacillus coagulans gbi - 30,6086;克里)。以每种细菌的目标浓度为1.13 × 109 cfu/kg,制备了相同的紫花苜蓿预混料。预混料使用带状混合器混合,使用100马力双速制粒机(CPM,型号2S)使用5/32英寸制粒模具以54.5 kg/min的速率和85℃的调节温度,将两个样品(25 g)分别添加到225 mL缓冲蛋白胨水(BPW)中。为了评估凝固芽孢杆菌GBI-30、6086、粪芽孢杆菌、长芽孢杆菌、干酪乳杆菌和罗伊氏乳杆菌的生存能力,将样品在胃机中以230转/分的速度匀浆2分钟,在BPW上稀释,然后在选择性培养基中进行涂膜。在不同条件下孵育24 ~ 48 h: Luria-Bertani 42°C;脑心输注42℃;de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) 37°C厌氧;MRS 37°C有氧。计数25至250个菌落的平板,记录结果为每克log10 cfu。数据采用混合方差分析(SAS 9.4)。制粒前后的数据如表1所示。综上所述,这些数据表明,当以颗粒形式提供时,马饲料和补充剂中常用的一些细菌不符合益生菌的定义。此外,这种类型的研究可以作为筛选工具,以确定哪些益生菌应该成为马的额外生理研究的主题。凝固芽孢杆菌gbi - 30,6086是一种独特的孢子形成细菌,可以在球团中存活,使其在马体内发挥益生菌的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (JEVS) is an international publication designed for the practicing equine veterinarian, equine researcher, and other equine health care specialist. Published monthly, each issue of JEVS includes original research, reviews, case reports, short communications, and clinical techniques from leaders in the equine veterinary field, covering such topics as laminitis, reproduction, infectious disease, parasitology, behavior, podology, internal medicine, surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信