A walker's paradise Ain't a driver's hell: Evaluating the causal effect of temporary road pedestrianization on traffic conditions of surrounding roads

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Giancarlos Parady , Makoto Chikaraishi , Yuki Oyama
{"title":"A walker's paradise Ain't a driver's hell: Evaluating the causal effect of temporary road pedestrianization on traffic conditions of surrounding roads","authors":"Giancarlos Parady ,&nbsp;Makoto Chikaraishi ,&nbsp;Yuki Oyama","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study uses a natural experiment approach to evaluate the causal effect of three regular road pedestrianization schemes in Central Tokyo on traffic conditions in surrounding areas. Cross-sectional traffic volume data collected by the Metropolitan Police Department via traffic counters was used as the dependent variable and causal effect evaluation was done via a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, where the temporal pedestrianization of a street was used as the treatment of interest. We take advantage of (1) the variability in pedestrianization execution days and (2) the seasonal variability in pedestrianization time periods, to define the natural experiments. Furthermore, three different buffer areas of 500 m, 750 m and 1000 m were used to evaluate the sensitivity of effect estimates to the definition of the impact area. No evidence of severe increases in traffic volume in the surrounding areas of pedestrianized roads was found, suggesting that human-centric network design is not necessarily a zero-sum game between pedestrians and drivers. While small increases in traffic volume of around 5 % and slight increases in congestion near pedestrianized links can be expected, these changes are unlikely to translate into worsening traffic conditions and can be managed by the existing road network in Tokyo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104269"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325001607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses a natural experiment approach to evaluate the causal effect of three regular road pedestrianization schemes in Central Tokyo on traffic conditions in surrounding areas. Cross-sectional traffic volume data collected by the Metropolitan Police Department via traffic counters was used as the dependent variable and causal effect evaluation was done via a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, where the temporal pedestrianization of a street was used as the treatment of interest. We take advantage of (1) the variability in pedestrianization execution days and (2) the seasonal variability in pedestrianization time periods, to define the natural experiments. Furthermore, three different buffer areas of 500 m, 750 m and 1000 m were used to evaluate the sensitivity of effect estimates to the definition of the impact area. No evidence of severe increases in traffic volume in the surrounding areas of pedestrianized roads was found, suggesting that human-centric network design is not necessarily a zero-sum game between pedestrians and drivers. While small increases in traffic volume of around 5 % and slight increases in congestion near pedestrianized links can be expected, these changes are unlikely to translate into worsening traffic conditions and can be managed by the existing road network in Tokyo.
步行者的天堂不是司机的地狱:评估临时道路行人专用化对周围道路交通状况的因果影响
本研究采用自然实验方法,评估东京市中心三种常规道路行人专用化方案对周边地区交通状况的因果效应。大都会警察局通过交通计数器收集的横断面交通量数据被用作因变量,因果效应评估通过差分法(DID)进行,其中街道的时间步行化被用作感兴趣的处理。我们利用(1)步行区执行日期的可变性和(2)步行区时间段的季节性可变性来定义自然实验。此外,采用500 m、750 m和1000 m三个不同的缓冲区来评估影响评估对影响区域定义的敏感性。没有证据表明行人专用道周边地区的交通量有明显增加,这表明以人为中心的网络设计不一定是行人和司机之间的零和游戏。虽然预计交通量将小幅增加5%左右,行人专用区附近的拥堵也会略有增加,但这些变化不太可能转化为交通状况的恶化,可以通过东京现有的道路网络进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信