Crisis management in the pharmaceutical industry during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Latonen , S. Pussila , H. Seeck , M. Airaksinen , A.M. Juppo
{"title":"Crisis management in the pharmaceutical industry during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"S. Latonen ,&nbsp;S. Pussila ,&nbsp;H. Seeck ,&nbsp;M. Airaksinen ,&nbsp;A.M. Juppo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the vulnerabilities of the pharmaceutical industry and its critical role in functioning healthcare systems, no previous crisis management theory–based empirical studies focusing on this field during the COVID-19 pandemic has been published. The present study aims to fill this gap and identify areas for development to improve future crisis preparedness. Organisational crisis management process models provided a theoretical framework. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted during the second wave of the pandemic (October–November 2020). This online survey was developed based on the crisis management process models and sent to managing directors working in the pharmaceutical and wholesale companies (<em>n</em> = 73) in Finland. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and open-field responses were analysed qualitatively using content analysis. Nine semi-structured interviews with industry leaders and managers conducted in March–May 2021 were utilised in data triangulation. The results revealed that crisis preparedness improved concurrently during the pandemic due to increased risk perception, updated preparedness plans and operational changes. Crisis decision-making was made via teams or shared efforts between key persons. Anticipation of and responses to increased demand and stocking, coordination and collaboration among pharmaceutical supply chain stakeholders were identified as key challenges. The study extends crisis management process models to the pharmaceutical industry context and advances this research field by drawing on a novel approach for data collection utilising crisis management process models for survey development. Practical implications for improving future preparedness are suggested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 105566"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925003905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the vulnerabilities of the pharmaceutical industry and its critical role in functioning healthcare systems, no previous crisis management theory–based empirical studies focusing on this field during the COVID-19 pandemic has been published. The present study aims to fill this gap and identify areas for development to improve future crisis preparedness. Organisational crisis management process models provided a theoretical framework. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted during the second wave of the pandemic (October–November 2020). This online survey was developed based on the crisis management process models and sent to managing directors working in the pharmaceutical and wholesale companies (n = 73) in Finland. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and open-field responses were analysed qualitatively using content analysis. Nine semi-structured interviews with industry leaders and managers conducted in March–May 2021 were utilised in data triangulation. The results revealed that crisis preparedness improved concurrently during the pandemic due to increased risk perception, updated preparedness plans and operational changes. Crisis decision-making was made via teams or shared efforts between key persons. Anticipation of and responses to increased demand and stocking, coordination and collaboration among pharmaceutical supply chain stakeholders were identified as key challenges. The study extends crisis management process models to the pharmaceutical industry context and advances this research field by drawing on a novel approach for data collection utilising crisis management process models for survey development. Practical implications for improving future preparedness are suggested.
COVID-19大流行期间制药行业的危机管理
尽管制药行业存在脆弱性,在医疗保健系统中发挥着关键作用,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,尚无针对该领域的基于危机管理理论的实证研究发表。本研究旨在填补这一空白,并确定发展领域,以改善未来的危机准备。组织危机管理过程模型提供了理论框架。在第二波大流行期间(2020年10月至11月)进行了一项横断面调查研究。这项在线调查是基于危机管理过程模型开发的,并发送给芬兰制药和批发公司的董事总经理(n = 73)。计算描述性统计数据,并使用内容分析对开场反应进行定性分析。在2021年3月至5月期间,对行业领导者和经理进行了9次半结构化访谈,并将其用于数据三角测量。结果显示,在大流行期间,由于风险意识增强、准备计划更新和业务变化,危机准备工作同时有所改善。危机决策是通过团队或关键人员共同努力做出的。对需求和库存增加的预测和应对,以及药品供应链利益攸关方之间的协调和合作被确定为主要挑战。该研究将危机管理过程模型扩展到制药行业的背景下,并通过利用危机管理过程模型进行调查开发的数据收集的新方法推进了这一研究领域。提出了改进未来准备工作的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信