Education in foot care using dialogic learning or conversation maps for people with diabetes

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Erika Karina Quishpe Narváez , Hugo Pereira Olmos , Laercio Joel Franco , Antonio Ruffino-Netto , Iván Guillermo Dueñas Espín
{"title":"Education in foot care using dialogic learning or conversation maps for people with diabetes","authors":"Erika Karina Quishpe Narváez ,&nbsp;Hugo Pereira Olmos ,&nbsp;Laercio Joel Franco ,&nbsp;Antonio Ruffino-Netto ,&nbsp;Iván Guillermo Dueñas Espín","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.108823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the efficacy of two educational strategies for improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding foot care among individuals with diabetes: traditional education with dialogic learning and conversation maps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A controlled pre- and post-test quasi-experimental design was employed. Group 1 received education with dialogic learning, while Group 2 received education with conversation maps. All participants completed a questionnaire on their knowledge, attitudes, and practices before and after the educational intervention. The statistical test measured the difference in means.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 140 individuals participated, with 42 (30 %) in Group 1 and 98 (70 %) in Group 2. Both groups had significantly more correct answers after than before the intervention (mean: 14.2–26.6, Wilcoxon paired test, p = 0.01).</div><div>The increase in correct answers after the intervention was more pronounced in the group using dialogic learning than in the group using conversation maps (mean difference in correct answers of Group 1 vs. Group 2: 14.6 vs. 11.5; Wilcoxon paired test, p = 0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Improved results were observed for both educational strategies after the intervention. Dialogic learning was more effective than conversation maps in improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to foot care.</div></div><div><h3>Practical implications</h3><div>Structured, community-based education using dialogic learning or conversation maps may enhance self-care and prevent foot complications in people with diabetes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 108823"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125001909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of two educational strategies for improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding foot care among individuals with diabetes: traditional education with dialogic learning and conversation maps.

Methods

A controlled pre- and post-test quasi-experimental design was employed. Group 1 received education with dialogic learning, while Group 2 received education with conversation maps. All participants completed a questionnaire on their knowledge, attitudes, and practices before and after the educational intervention. The statistical test measured the difference in means.

Results

A total of 140 individuals participated, with 42 (30 %) in Group 1 and 98 (70 %) in Group 2. Both groups had significantly more correct answers after than before the intervention (mean: 14.2–26.6, Wilcoxon paired test, p = 0.01).
The increase in correct answers after the intervention was more pronounced in the group using dialogic learning than in the group using conversation maps (mean difference in correct answers of Group 1 vs. Group 2: 14.6 vs. 11.5; Wilcoxon paired test, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Improved results were observed for both educational strategies after the intervention. Dialogic learning was more effective than conversation maps in improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to foot care.

Practical implications

Structured, community-based education using dialogic learning or conversation maps may enhance self-care and prevent foot complications in people with diabetes.
利用对话学习或对话图对糖尿病患者进行足部保健教育
目的比较两种教育策略在改善糖尿病患者足部护理知识、态度和实践方面的效果:传统的对话学习教育和对话地图教育。方法采用前后对照准实验设计。第一组采用对话学习,第二组采用对话图学习。所有参与者在教育干预前后完成了一份关于他们的知识、态度和行为的调查问卷。统计检验测量了平均值的差异。结果共140例患者,其中1组42例(30 %),2组98例(70 %)。干预后两组的正确率均显著高于干预前(平均值:14.2 ~ 26.6,Wilcoxon配对检验,p = 0.01)。使用对话学习的组在干预后正确答案的增加比使用对话图的组更明显(第一组与第二组正确答案的平均差异:14.6 vs 11.5;Wilcoxon配对检验,p = 0.005)。结论干预后两种教育策略的效果均有改善。对话学习在改善足部护理的知识、态度和实践方面比对话地图更有效。实际意义采用对话学习或对话图的结构化社区教育可以增强糖尿病患者的自我保健和预防足部并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信