A comprehensive assessment of life cycle environmental impact and economic feasibility of different red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L) cultivation systems

Angeliki Xyderou Malefaki , Nicolas Valanides , George A Manganaris , Lisa Wasko DeVetter , Sofia Papadaki , Magdalini Krokida , Antonia Vyrkou , Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis
{"title":"A comprehensive assessment of life cycle environmental impact and economic feasibility of different red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L) cultivation systems","authors":"Angeliki Xyderou Malefaki ,&nbsp;Nicolas Valanides ,&nbsp;George A Manganaris ,&nbsp;Lisa Wasko DeVetter ,&nbsp;Sofia Papadaki ,&nbsp;Magdalini Krokida ,&nbsp;Antonia Vyrkou ,&nbsp;Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis","doi":"10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Red raspberry is considered a knowledge- and capital-intensive crop that targets a niche market globally; its quality attributes and enhanced health-promoting properties are highly appreciated by the consumers. In the context of the exponential growth in demand for this specialty crop that suffers from limited shelf life, it is imperative to expand raspberry cultivation by employing sustainably-sourced production models. In the current study, we used Cyprus as a case study that is characterised by increased production costs and lack of year-round production despite the fact that the latter is feasible under different production systems and cultivation methods in different altitude-related meso‑climates. Towards that goal, the current study assessed the life cycle environmental impact and life cycle costs of two different cultivation methods - open-field production that took place from May to November 2022 and protected cultivation in high-tunnels, from August 2023 to April 2024, using in both cases the same cultivar (Kwanza®) and plant type. The results indicated that protected cultivation has better environmental performance (3.7 mPt - milli eco-points - per kg of raspberry produced compared to 7.4 mPt for open-field production). Noteworthy, production cost is excessive and substantially higher compared to other countries; open-field production has a life cycle cost of 22.5 €/kg, while protected cultivation achieved a lower life cycle cost, equal to 14.0 €/kg yet still high. From an output perspective, a key observation is the increased yield of raspberries in protected cultivation as well as the enhanced water use efficiency of the crop, due to a reduction of the water footprint by 76 %. It is also important to highlight the increased harvest efficiency of the crop under high tunnel, with 500 g per plant compared to 350 g on open field cultivation. Hence, it is safe to conclude that despite the increased start-up costs and knowledge-intensive practices, the productivity of the crop is increased during the off-season months, that can be sold for a premium. The results highlight the environmental and economic impact of the two cultivation methods and will be useful for producers and crop advisors seeking to expand the raspberry cultivation in climates that resembles south-eastern Europe and are characterised as vulnerable to adverse climate change scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100250,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277280132500017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Red raspberry is considered a knowledge- and capital-intensive crop that targets a niche market globally; its quality attributes and enhanced health-promoting properties are highly appreciated by the consumers. In the context of the exponential growth in demand for this specialty crop that suffers from limited shelf life, it is imperative to expand raspberry cultivation by employing sustainably-sourced production models. In the current study, we used Cyprus as a case study that is characterised by increased production costs and lack of year-round production despite the fact that the latter is feasible under different production systems and cultivation methods in different altitude-related meso‑climates. Towards that goal, the current study assessed the life cycle environmental impact and life cycle costs of two different cultivation methods - open-field production that took place from May to November 2022 and protected cultivation in high-tunnels, from August 2023 to April 2024, using in both cases the same cultivar (Kwanza®) and plant type. The results indicated that protected cultivation has better environmental performance (3.7 mPt - milli eco-points - per kg of raspberry produced compared to 7.4 mPt for open-field production). Noteworthy, production cost is excessive and substantially higher compared to other countries; open-field production has a life cycle cost of 22.5 €/kg, while protected cultivation achieved a lower life cycle cost, equal to 14.0 €/kg yet still high. From an output perspective, a key observation is the increased yield of raspberries in protected cultivation as well as the enhanced water use efficiency of the crop, due to a reduction of the water footprint by 76 %. It is also important to highlight the increased harvest efficiency of the crop under high tunnel, with 500 g per plant compared to 350 g on open field cultivation. Hence, it is safe to conclude that despite the increased start-up costs and knowledge-intensive practices, the productivity of the crop is increased during the off-season months, that can be sold for a premium. The results highlight the environmental and economic impact of the two cultivation methods and will be useful for producers and crop advisors seeking to expand the raspberry cultivation in climates that resembles south-eastern Europe and are characterised as vulnerable to adverse climate change scenarios.
不同覆盆子栽培体系生命周期环境影响及经济可行性综合评价
红覆盆子被认为是一种知识和资本密集型作物,目标是全球利基市场;其品质属性和增强的健康促进功能受到消费者的高度赞赏。在对这种保质期有限的特殊作物的需求呈指数增长的背景下,通过采用可持续来源的生产模式来扩大覆盆子的种植是势在必行的。在目前的研究中,我们以塞浦路斯为例进行研究,塞浦路斯的特点是生产成本增加,缺乏全年生产,尽管后者在不同的生产系统和种植方法下是可行的,在不同的海拔相关的中气候条件下。为了实现这一目标,目前的研究评估了两种不同种植方法的生命周期环境影响和生命周期成本——2022年5月至11月的露天种植和2023年8月至2024年4月的高隧道保护种植,在两种情况下使用相同的品种(宽扎®)和植物类型。结果表明,保护栽培具有更好的环境绩效(每公斤覆盆子生产3.7 mPt -百万生态点,而露天生产为7.4 mPt)。值得注意的是,生产成本过高,比其他国家高得多;露地生产的生命周期成本为22.5欧元/公斤,而保护地种植的生命周期成本较低,为14.0欧元/公斤,但仍然很高。从产出的角度来看,一个关键的观察结果是,由于水足迹减少了76%,覆盆子在保护栽培中的产量增加以及作物的水利用效率提高。同样重要的是要强调高隧道下作物收获效率的提高,每株500克,而露天栽培为350克。因此,可以有把握地得出结论,尽管增加了启动成本和知识密集型做法,但作物的生产力在淡季月份有所提高,可以溢价出售。研究结果强调了这两种种植方法的环境和经济影响,对于寻求在类似东南欧的气候条件下扩大覆盆子种植的生产者和作物顾问来说将是有用的,这些气候条件容易受到不利气候变化情景的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信