Hee Kyoung Kim , Jun-Sik Lim , Seonghui Cho , Eun Woo Lee , Minje Lee , Dong Wook Kim , Kyungnam Kim , Achangwa Chiara , Sang-Eun Lee , Sukhyun Ryu
{"title":"Superspreading potential of SARS-CoV-2 across multiple infection generations","authors":"Hee Kyoung Kim , Jun-Sik Lim , Seonghui Cho , Eun Woo Lee , Minje Lee , Dong Wook Kim , Kyungnam Kim , Achangwa Chiara , Sang-Eun Lee , Sukhyun Ryu","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the first patients to be identified as the source of infection in the clustered outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were labeled superspreaders in South Korea. However, the extent to which superspreading potential varies across different infection generations remains unclear. This study aims to estimate SARS-CoV-2 superspreading potentials across different infection generations from the largest clustered outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 wild type in Seoul, South Korea, 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrieved the infector–infectee line list data on an outbreak occurred between May 6 and June 5, 2020. To evaluate the superspreading potential (<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span>), we fitted the offspring distributions that had been acquired by counting the number of observed secondary infections for each case and each generation into negative binomial distributions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The outbreak yielded a <span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> value of 0.18 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.27) and similar superspreading potentials across the different infection generations. Regarding the superspreading potential in each generation (i.e., individuals’ heterogeneity across different generations), <span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> was estimated to be 0.27 (95 % CI: 0.15–0.51), 0.14 (0.03–0.23), 0.10 (0.01–0.17), 0.55 (0.12–5.80 ×10<sup>5</sup>), and 0.19 (0.07–0.73) for the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or more generations, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings revealed no significant variations in the superspreading potential of SARS-CoV-2 across cases from different infection generations in the clustered outbreak. Assessing superspreading potential during the epidemic is necessary to refine epidemic modeling and enhance public health understanding of the transmission dynamic of epidemics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"18 8","pages":"Article 102808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034125001571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Early during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the first patients to be identified as the source of infection in the clustered outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were labeled superspreaders in South Korea. However, the extent to which superspreading potential varies across different infection generations remains unclear. This study aims to estimate SARS-CoV-2 superspreading potentials across different infection generations from the largest clustered outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 wild type in Seoul, South Korea, 2020.
Methods
We retrieved the infector–infectee line list data on an outbreak occurred between May 6 and June 5, 2020. To evaluate the superspreading potential (), we fitted the offspring distributions that had been acquired by counting the number of observed secondary infections for each case and each generation into negative binomial distributions.
Results
The outbreak yielded a value of 0.18 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.27) and similar superspreading potentials across the different infection generations. Regarding the superspreading potential in each generation (i.e., individuals’ heterogeneity across different generations), was estimated to be 0.27 (95 % CI: 0.15–0.51), 0.14 (0.03–0.23), 0.10 (0.01–0.17), 0.55 (0.12–5.80 ×105), and 0.19 (0.07–0.73) for the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or more generations, respectively.
Conclusions
Our findings revealed no significant variations in the superspreading potential of SARS-CoV-2 across cases from different infection generations in the clustered outbreak. Assessing superspreading potential during the epidemic is necessary to refine epidemic modeling and enhance public health understanding of the transmission dynamic of epidemics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other.
The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners.
It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.