Phosphine as a possible alternative to methyl bromide for the phytosanitary treatment of wood products

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Matthew K.D. Hall , Laura M. Machuca-Mesa , Adnan Uzunovic , Sunil K. Yadav , Dongwoon Lee , Manoj K. Nayak
{"title":"Phosphine as a possible alternative to methyl bromide for the phytosanitary treatment of wood products","authors":"Matthew K.D. Hall ,&nbsp;Laura M. Machuca-Mesa ,&nbsp;Adnan Uzunovic ,&nbsp;Sunil K. Yadav ,&nbsp;Dongwoon Lee ,&nbsp;Manoj K. Nayak","doi":"10.1016/j.jspr.2025.102672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phosphine (PH<sub>3</sub>) has gained momentum as a phytosanitary treatment to control quarantine pests in exported wood products. Originally used as a grain fumigant, its use increased after methyl bromide was banned for its ozone-depleting properties. While the effectiveness of PH<sub>3</sub> against grain pests is well-established, its efficacy for wood products requires review due to growing adoption. We observed insufficient evidence supporting PH<sub>3</sub> as a broad-spectrum quarantine treatment for wood products from peer-reviewed/gray literature and international groups. We assessed 41 research articles covering 29 insect species, 1 nematode, and 11 fungi, and observed that while PH<sub>3</sub> is effective against some forest insects, it generally fails to meet quarantine treatment standards and is ineffective against nematodes and fungi. Our analysis highlights concerns over the effectiveness of PH<sub>3</sub> as a broad-spectrum treatment for wood products. Many studies lack the quality needed to meet contemporary standards. We strongly recommend that National Plant Protection Organizations review the efficacy data supporting PH<sub>3</sub> use for wood products to strengthen biosecurity systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stored Products Research","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stored Products Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X25001316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phosphine (PH3) has gained momentum as a phytosanitary treatment to control quarantine pests in exported wood products. Originally used as a grain fumigant, its use increased after methyl bromide was banned for its ozone-depleting properties. While the effectiveness of PH3 against grain pests is well-established, its efficacy for wood products requires review due to growing adoption. We observed insufficient evidence supporting PH3 as a broad-spectrum quarantine treatment for wood products from peer-reviewed/gray literature and international groups. We assessed 41 research articles covering 29 insect species, 1 nematode, and 11 fungi, and observed that while PH3 is effective against some forest insects, it generally fails to meet quarantine treatment standards and is ineffective against nematodes and fungi. Our analysis highlights concerns over the effectiveness of PH3 as a broad-spectrum treatment for wood products. Many studies lack the quality needed to meet contemporary standards. We strongly recommend that National Plant Protection Organizations review the efficacy data supporting PH3 use for wood products to strengthen biosecurity systems.
磷化氢作为甲基溴的可能替代品用于木制品的植物检疫处理
磷化氢(PH3)作为一种控制出口木制品检疫性有害生物的植物检疫处理方法已得到广泛应用。它最初被用作谷物熏蒸剂,在甲基溴因其破坏臭氧的特性而被禁止使用后,其使用量增加了。虽然PH3对谷物害虫的有效性是公认的,但由于越来越多的采用,其对木制品的功效需要审查。我们从同行评审/灰色文献和国际团体中观察到支持PH3作为木制品的广谱检疫处理的证据不足。我们评估了41篇涉及29种昆虫、1种线虫和11种真菌的研究论文,发现PH3对部分森林昆虫有效,但普遍不符合检疫处理标准,对线虫和真菌无效。我们的分析强调了对PH3作为木材产品广谱处理的有效性的关注。许多研究缺乏满足当代标准所需的质量。我们强烈建议国家植物保护组织审查支持PH3用于木制品以加强生物安全系统的功效数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
18.50%
发文量
112
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stored Products Research provides an international medium for the publication of both reviews and original results from laboratory and field studies on the preservation and safety of stored products, notably food stocks, covering storage-related problems from the producer through the supply chain to the consumer. Stored products are characterised by having relatively low moisture content and include raw and semi-processed foods, animal feedstuffs, and a range of other durable items, including materials such as clothing or museum artefacts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信