Evolutionary trajectories of multiple defense traits across phylogenetic and geographic scales in Vitis

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1002/ecog.07722
Carolyn D. K. Graham, Marjorie G. Weber
{"title":"Evolutionary trajectories of multiple defense traits across phylogenetic and geographic scales in Vitis","authors":"Carolyn D. K. Graham, Marjorie G. Weber","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The processes driving defense trait correlations may vary within and between species based on ecological or environmental contexts. However, most studies of plant defense theory fail to address this potential for shifts in trait correlations across scales. In this work, we tested for correlations between multiple defensive traits (secondary chemistry, carbon to nitrogen ratio, domatia, leaf toughness, trichomes, and pearl bodies) across a common garden of 21 <i>Vitis</i> species and eighteen genotypes of the species <i>Vitis riparia</i> to identify when and where patterns of defense trait evolution persist or break down across biological scales. Additionally, we asked whether <i>Vitis</i> defense trait investment correlates with environmental variables as predicted by plant defense theory, using environmental metrics for each <i>Vitis</i> species and <i>V. riparia</i> genotype from the GBIF and WorldClim databases. We tested for correlations between defense trait investment, herbivore palatability, and environmental variables using phylogenetically informed models. Beyond a few likely physiological exceptions, we observed a lack of significant correlations between defense traits at both intra- and interspecific scales, indicating that these traits evolve independently of each other in <i>Vitis</i> rather than forming predictable defense syndromes. We did find that investment in carbon:nitrogen (at both scales) and pearl bodies increases with proximity to the equator, demonstrating support for plant defense theory's prediction of higher investment in defenses at more equatorial environments for some, but not all, defense traits. Overall, our results challenge commonly held hypotheses about plant defense evolution, namely the concept of syndromes, by demonstrating that strong correlations between defense traits are not the prevailing pattern both across and within <i>Vitis</i> species. Our work also provides the first comprehensive evaluation of the evolutionary divergence in approaches that <i>Vitis</i>, a genus with significant agricultural value, have evolved to defend themselves against herbivores.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07722","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The processes driving defense trait correlations may vary within and between species based on ecological or environmental contexts. However, most studies of plant defense theory fail to address this potential for shifts in trait correlations across scales. In this work, we tested for correlations between multiple defensive traits (secondary chemistry, carbon to nitrogen ratio, domatia, leaf toughness, trichomes, and pearl bodies) across a common garden of 21 Vitis species and eighteen genotypes of the species Vitis riparia to identify when and where patterns of defense trait evolution persist or break down across biological scales. Additionally, we asked whether Vitis defense trait investment correlates with environmental variables as predicted by plant defense theory, using environmental metrics for each Vitis species and V. riparia genotype from the GBIF and WorldClim databases. We tested for correlations between defense trait investment, herbivore palatability, and environmental variables using phylogenetically informed models. Beyond a few likely physiological exceptions, we observed a lack of significant correlations between defense traits at both intra- and interspecific scales, indicating that these traits evolve independently of each other in Vitis rather than forming predictable defense syndromes. We did find that investment in carbon:nitrogen (at both scales) and pearl bodies increases with proximity to the equator, demonstrating support for plant defense theory's prediction of higher investment in defenses at more equatorial environments for some, but not all, defense traits. Overall, our results challenge commonly held hypotheses about plant defense evolution, namely the concept of syndromes, by demonstrating that strong correlations between defense traits are not the prevailing pattern both across and within Vitis species. Our work also provides the first comprehensive evaluation of the evolutionary divergence in approaches that Vitis, a genus with significant agricultural value, have evolved to defend themselves against herbivores.
葡萄多种防御性状在系统发育和地理尺度上的进化轨迹
基于生态或环境背景,驱动防御性状相关性的过程可能在物种内部和物种之间有所不同。然而,大多数植物防御理论的研究未能解决这种跨尺度性状相关性变化的潜在问题。在这项工作中,我们测试了多个防御性状(次生化学、碳氮比、domatia、叶韧性、毛状体和珍珠体)在21种葡萄和18种葡萄的共同花园中的相关性,以确定防御性状进化模式在生物尺度上持续或破坏的时间和地点。此外,我们利用GBIF和WorldClim数据库中葡萄品种和河滨葡萄基因型的环境指标,研究葡萄防御性状投资是否与植物防御理论预测的环境变量相关。我们使用系统发育知情模型测试了防御性状投资、草食动物适口性和环境变量之间的相关性。除了一些可能的生理异常外,我们观察到在种内和种间尺度上防御性状之间缺乏显著的相关性,这表明这些性状在葡萄中相互独立进化,而不是形成可预测的防御综合征。我们确实发现,在碳氮(在两个尺度上)和珍珠体上的投资随着靠近赤道而增加,这证明了植物防御理论的预测,即在更赤道的环境中,对某些防御性状的防御投资更高,但不是全部。总的来说,我们的研究结果挑战了关于植物防御进化的普遍假设,即综合征的概念,通过证明防御性状之间的强相关性不是葡萄属植物之间和物种内部的普遍模式。我们的工作也提供了第一个全面的评估进化分歧的方法,葡萄属具有重要的农业价值,已经进化到保护自己免受食草动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信