Bio-oil from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae cultivated in wastewater: An economic and life cycle approach

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Thiago Abrantes Silva , Maurino Magno de Jesus Junior , Iara Barbosa Magalhães , Marina Stéfany Ananias , Alexia Saleme Aona de Paula Pereira , Fábio de Ávila Rodrigues , Alberto José Delgado dos Reis , Maria Lúcia Calijuri
{"title":"Bio-oil from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae cultivated in wastewater: An economic and life cycle approach","authors":"Thiago Abrantes Silva ,&nbsp;Maurino Magno de Jesus Junior ,&nbsp;Iara Barbosa Magalhães ,&nbsp;Marina Stéfany Ananias ,&nbsp;Alexia Saleme Aona de Paula Pereira ,&nbsp;Fábio de Ávila Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Alberto José Delgado dos Reis ,&nbsp;Maria Lúcia Calijuri","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although microalgae are a promising sustainable biofuel feedstock, their energy-intensive production and most environmental assessments rarely achieve the desired trade-off between productivity and sustainability. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of producing bio-oil via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of wastewater-grown microalgae at an industrial scale. Four scenarios varied production scale and steam source: sugarcane bagasse (SCB) in SC1 and SC3, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in SC2 and SC4. Each scenario processed microalgae at 300 °C for 30 min. Smaller-scale feedstock (1332.9 kg/h) in SC1 and SC2 produced 34.6 kg/h of bio-oil, while the larger feedstock (85,554.4 kg/h) in SC3 and SC4 yielded 2222.2 kg/h. Microalgae biomass cultivation costs dominated overall expenses (56–75 %). Economic analyses indicated minimum selling prices of 3.82–8.52 USD/kg, exceeding the average literature figure of 1.57 USD/kg. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) showed SCB reduced fossil resource depletion by 14.97 % compared to LPG but increased emissions of nitrogen oxides, particulates, and toxic compounds, which are manageable via selective catalytic reduction and flue gas desulphurization. Cyclohexane as a solvent elevated human carcinogenic toxicity, greener alternatives could reduce toxicity but may cost more, requiring further cost analysis. Advancing this biorefinery route requires optimization of cultivation and processing costs, adoption of environmentally benign solvents, and implementation of emission control strategies to enable economically feasible and environmentally sustainable bio-oil production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"512 ","pages":"Article 145719"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625010698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although microalgae are a promising sustainable biofuel feedstock, their energy-intensive production and most environmental assessments rarely achieve the desired trade-off between productivity and sustainability. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of producing bio-oil via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of wastewater-grown microalgae at an industrial scale. Four scenarios varied production scale and steam source: sugarcane bagasse (SCB) in SC1 and SC3, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in SC2 and SC4. Each scenario processed microalgae at 300 °C for 30 min. Smaller-scale feedstock (1332.9 kg/h) in SC1 and SC2 produced 34.6 kg/h of bio-oil, while the larger feedstock (85,554.4 kg/h) in SC3 and SC4 yielded 2222.2 kg/h. Microalgae biomass cultivation costs dominated overall expenses (56–75 %). Economic analyses indicated minimum selling prices of 3.82–8.52 USD/kg, exceeding the average literature figure of 1.57 USD/kg. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) showed SCB reduced fossil resource depletion by 14.97 % compared to LPG but increased emissions of nitrogen oxides, particulates, and toxic compounds, which are manageable via selective catalytic reduction and flue gas desulphurization. Cyclohexane as a solvent elevated human carcinogenic toxicity, greener alternatives could reduce toxicity but may cost more, requiring further cost analysis. Advancing this biorefinery route requires optimization of cultivation and processing costs, adoption of environmentally benign solvents, and implementation of emission control strategies to enable economically feasible and environmentally sustainable bio-oil production.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

废水中培养的微藻水热液化生物油:经济和生命周期方法
虽然微藻是一种很有前途的可持续生物燃料原料,但它们的能源密集型生产和大多数环境评估很少能在生产力和可持续性之间实现理想的权衡。在此背景下,本研究旨在评估废水微藻在工业规模上通过水热液化(HTL)生产生物油的经济和环境可行性。四种不同的生产规模和蒸汽来源方案:蔗渣(SCB)在SC1和SC3,液化石油气(LPG)在SC2和SC4。每个场景在300°C下处理微藻30分钟。在SC1和SC2中,较小规模的原料(1,332.9 kg/h)产生了34.6 kg/h的生物油,而在SC3和SC4中,较大的原料(85,554.4 kg/h)产生了2,222.2 kg/h。微藻生物量培养成本占总费用的56-75%。经济分析表明,最低售价为3.82-8.52美元/公斤,超过了文献中1.57美元/公斤的平均数字。生命周期评估(LCA)显示,与LPG相比,SCB减少了14.97%的化石资源消耗,但增加了氮氧化物、颗粒物和有毒化合物的排放,这些可以通过选择性催化还原和烟气脱硫来控制。环己烷作为溶剂会提高人类的致癌毒性,更环保的替代品可以降低毒性,但可能成本更高,需要进一步的成本分析。推进这条生物炼制路线需要优化种植和加工成本,采用环保溶剂,实施排放控制策略,以实现经济上可行和环境上可持续的生物油生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信