Thomas Kisby, Gerben R. Borst, David J. Coope, Kostas Kostarelos
{"title":"Targeting the glioblastoma resection margin with locoregional nanotechnologies","authors":"Thomas Kisby, Gerben R. Borst, David J. Coope, Kostas Kostarelos","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01020-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surgical resection is the first stage of treatment for patients diagnosed with resectable glioblastoma and is followed by a combination of adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic single-agent chemotherapy, which is typically commenced 4–6 weeks after surgery. This delay creates an interval during which residual tumour cells residing in the resection margin can undergo uninhibited proliferation and further invasion, even immediately after surgery, thus limiting the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies. Recognition of the postsurgical resection margin and peri-marginal zones as important anatomical clinical targets and the need to rethink current strategies can galvanize opportunities for local, intraoperative approaches, while also generating a new landscape of innovative treatment modalities. In this Perspective, we discuss opportunities and challenges for developing locoregional therapeutic strategies to target the glioblastoma resection margin as well as emerging opportunities offered by nanotechnology in this clinically transformative setting. We also discuss how persistent barriers to clinical translation can be overcome to offer a potential path forward towards broader acceptability of such advanced technologies. Patients with resectable glioblastoma undergo upfront surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. This approach implies a period of approximately 4–6 weeks between surgery and the start of adjuvant therapy in which the patient receives no active treatment. In this Perspective, the authors describe the potential of local therapies targeting the tumour resection margin that can be administered during this time window, including biological feasibility, the potential role of nanomedicines and various technical and regulatory challenges that will need to be addressed before clinical implementation becomes feasible.","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"22 7","pages":"517-537"},"PeriodicalIF":82.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-025-01020-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Surgical resection is the first stage of treatment for patients diagnosed with resectable glioblastoma and is followed by a combination of adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic single-agent chemotherapy, which is typically commenced 4–6 weeks after surgery. This delay creates an interval during which residual tumour cells residing in the resection margin can undergo uninhibited proliferation and further invasion, even immediately after surgery, thus limiting the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies. Recognition of the postsurgical resection margin and peri-marginal zones as important anatomical clinical targets and the need to rethink current strategies can galvanize opportunities for local, intraoperative approaches, while also generating a new landscape of innovative treatment modalities. In this Perspective, we discuss opportunities and challenges for developing locoregional therapeutic strategies to target the glioblastoma resection margin as well as emerging opportunities offered by nanotechnology in this clinically transformative setting. We also discuss how persistent barriers to clinical translation can be overcome to offer a potential path forward towards broader acceptability of such advanced technologies. Patients with resectable glioblastoma undergo upfront surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. This approach implies a period of approximately 4–6 weeks between surgery and the start of adjuvant therapy in which the patient receives no active treatment. In this Perspective, the authors describe the potential of local therapies targeting the tumour resection margin that can be administered during this time window, including biological feasibility, the potential role of nanomedicines and various technical and regulatory challenges that will need to be addressed before clinical implementation becomes feasible.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.