Psychological intervention in individuals with subthreshold depression: individual participant data meta-analysis of treatment effects and moderators.

Mathias Harrer,Antonia A Sprenger,Susan Illing,Marcel C Adriaanse,Steven M Albert,Esther Allart,Osvaldo P Almeida,Julian Basanovic,Kim M P van Bastelaar,Philip J Batterham,Harald Baumeister,Thomas Berger,Vanessa Blanco,Ragnhild Bø,Robin J Casten,Dicken Chan,Helen Christensen,Marketa Ciharova,Lorna Cook,John Cornell,Elysia P Davis,Keith S Dobson,Elsien Dozeman,Simon Gilbody,Benjamin L Hankin,Rimke Haringsma,Kristof Hoorelbeke,Michael R Irwin,Femke Jansen,Rune Jonassen,Eirini Karyotaki,Norito Kawakami,J Philipp Klein,Candace Konnert,Kotaro Imamura,Nils Inge Landrø,María Asunción Lara,Huynh-Nhu Le,Dirk Lehr,Juan V Luciano,Steffen Moritz,Jana M Mossey,Ricardo F Muñoz,Anna Muntingh,Stephanie Nobis,Richard Olmstead,Patricia Otero,Mirjana Pibernik-Okanović,Anne Margriet Pot,Charles F Reynolds,Barry W Rovner,Juan P Sanabria-Mazo,Lasse B Sander,Filip Smit,Frank J Snoek,Viola Spek,Philip Spinhoven,Liza Stelmach,Yannik Terhorst,Fernando L Vázquez,Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw,Ed Watkins,Wenhui Yang,Samuel Yeung Shan Wong,Johannes Zimmermann,Masatsugu Sakata,Toshi A Furukawa,Stefan Leucht,Pim Cuijpers,Claudia Buntrock,David Daniel Ebert
{"title":"Psychological intervention in individuals with subthreshold depression: individual participant data meta-analysis of treatment effects and moderators.","authors":"Mathias Harrer,Antonia A Sprenger,Susan Illing,Marcel C Adriaanse,Steven M Albert,Esther Allart,Osvaldo P Almeida,Julian Basanovic,Kim M P van Bastelaar,Philip J Batterham,Harald Baumeister,Thomas Berger,Vanessa Blanco,Ragnhild Bø,Robin J Casten,Dicken Chan,Helen Christensen,Marketa Ciharova,Lorna Cook,John Cornell,Elysia P Davis,Keith S Dobson,Elsien Dozeman,Simon Gilbody,Benjamin L Hankin,Rimke Haringsma,Kristof Hoorelbeke,Michael R Irwin,Femke Jansen,Rune Jonassen,Eirini Karyotaki,Norito Kawakami,J Philipp Klein,Candace Konnert,Kotaro Imamura,Nils Inge Landrø,María Asunción Lara,Huynh-Nhu Le,Dirk Lehr,Juan V Luciano,Steffen Moritz,Jana M Mossey,Ricardo F Muñoz,Anna Muntingh,Stephanie Nobis,Richard Olmstead,Patricia Otero,Mirjana Pibernik-Okanović,Anne Margriet Pot,Charles F Reynolds,Barry W Rovner,Juan P Sanabria-Mazo,Lasse B Sander,Filip Smit,Frank J Snoek,Viola Spek,Philip Spinhoven,Liza Stelmach,Yannik Terhorst,Fernando L Vázquez,Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw,Ed Watkins,Wenhui Yang,Samuel Yeung Shan Wong,Johannes Zimmermann,Masatsugu Sakata,Toshi A Furukawa,Stefan Leucht,Pim Cuijpers,Claudia Buntrock,David Daniel Ebert","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIt remains unclear which individuals with subthreshold depression benefit most from psychological intervention, and what long-term effects this has on symptom deterioration, response and remission.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nTo synthesise psychological intervention benefits in adults with subthreshold depression up to 2 years, and explore participant-level effect-modifiers.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nRandomised trials comparing psychological intervention with inactive control were identified via systematic search. Authors were contacted to obtain individual participant data (IPD), analysed using Bayesian one-stage meta-analysis. Treatment-covariate interactions were added to examine moderators. Hierarchical-additive models were used to explore treatment benefits conditional on baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) values.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIPD of 10 671 individuals (50 studies) could be included. We found significant effects on depressive symptom severity up to 12 months (standardised mean-difference [s.m.d.] = -0.48 to -0.27). Effects could not be ascertained up to 24 months (s.m.d. = -0.18). Similar findings emerged for 50% symptom reduction (relative risk = 1.27-2.79), reliable improvement (relative risk = 1.38-3.17), deterioration (relative risk = 0.67-0.54) and close-to-symptom-free status (relative risk = 1.41-2.80). Among participant-level moderators, only initial depression and anxiety severity were highly credible (P > 0.99). Predicted treatment benefits decreased with lower symptom severity but remained minimally important even for very mild symptoms (s.m.d. = -0.33 for PHQ-9 = 5).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPsychological intervention reduces the symptom burden in individuals with subthreshold depression up to 1 year, and protects against symptom deterioration. Benefits up to 2 years are less certain. We find strong support for intervention in subthreshold depression, particularly with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 10. For very mild symptoms, scalable treatments could be an attractive option.","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"91 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND It remains unclear which individuals with subthreshold depression benefit most from psychological intervention, and what long-term effects this has on symptom deterioration, response and remission. AIMS To synthesise psychological intervention benefits in adults with subthreshold depression up to 2 years, and explore participant-level effect-modifiers. METHOD Randomised trials comparing psychological intervention with inactive control were identified via systematic search. Authors were contacted to obtain individual participant data (IPD), analysed using Bayesian one-stage meta-analysis. Treatment-covariate interactions were added to examine moderators. Hierarchical-additive models were used to explore treatment benefits conditional on baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) values. RESULTS IPD of 10 671 individuals (50 studies) could be included. We found significant effects on depressive symptom severity up to 12 months (standardised mean-difference [s.m.d.] = -0.48 to -0.27). Effects could not be ascertained up to 24 months (s.m.d. = -0.18). Similar findings emerged for 50% symptom reduction (relative risk = 1.27-2.79), reliable improvement (relative risk = 1.38-3.17), deterioration (relative risk = 0.67-0.54) and close-to-symptom-free status (relative risk = 1.41-2.80). Among participant-level moderators, only initial depression and anxiety severity were highly credible (P > 0.99). Predicted treatment benefits decreased with lower symptom severity but remained minimally important even for very mild symptoms (s.m.d. = -0.33 for PHQ-9 = 5). CONCLUSIONS Psychological intervention reduces the symptom burden in individuals with subthreshold depression up to 1 year, and protects against symptom deterioration. Benefits up to 2 years are less certain. We find strong support for intervention in subthreshold depression, particularly with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 10. For very mild symptoms, scalable treatments could be an attractive option.
阈下抑郁症个体的心理干预:治疗效果和调节因子的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
背景:目前尚不清楚哪些阈下抑郁症患者从心理干预中获益最多,以及心理干预对症状恶化、反应和缓解有何长期影响。目的综合心理干预对阈下抑郁2年以上成人患者的益处,并探索参与者水平的效应调节因子。方法通过系统检索确定比较心理干预与非主动对照的随机试验。联系作者获取个体参与者数据(IPD),使用贝叶斯单阶段荟萃分析进行分析。加入治疗-协变量相互作用来检验调节因子。使用分层加性模型来探讨以基线患者健康问卷9 (PHQ-9)值为条件的治疗效益。结果共纳入10671例(50项研究)。我们发现在长达12个月的抑郁症状严重程度上有显著的影响(标准化平均差异[s.m.d]。= -0.48 ~ -0.27)。效果在24个月后仍不能确定(标准差= -0.18)。症状减轻50%(相对危险度= 1.27-2.79)、可靠改善(相对危险度= 1.38-3.17)、恶化(相对危险度= 0.67-0.54)和接近无症状状态(相对危险度= 1.41-2.80)也出现了类似的结果。在参与者水平的调节因子中,只有初始抑郁和焦虑严重程度是高度可信的(P < 0.99)。预测治疗获益随着症状严重程度的降低而降低,但即使对于非常轻微的症状也保持最低的重要性(PHQ-9 = 5的s.m.d = -0.33)。结论心理干预可减轻阈下抑郁症患者长达1年的症状负担,防止症状恶化。长达2年的收益不太确定。我们发现对阈下抑郁的干预有强有力的支持,特别是当PHQ-9得分≥10时。对于非常轻微的症状,可扩展的治疗可能是一个有吸引力的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信