Safety and Efficacy of Vadadustat for the Treatment of CKD-Related Anemia within and outside the United States.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Glenn M Chertow,Kai-Uwe Eckardt,Mark J Sarnak,Wolfgang C Winkelmayer,Rajiv Agarwal,Todd Minga,Wenli Luo,Steven K Burke
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Vadadustat for the Treatment of CKD-Related Anemia within and outside the United States.","authors":"Glenn M Chertow,Kai-Uwe Eckardt,Mark J Sarnak,Wolfgang C Winkelmayer,Rajiv Agarwal,Todd Minga,Wenli Luo,Steven K Burke","doi":"10.1681/asn.0000000708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nVadadustat's global clinical program was comprised of four noninferiority trials comparing vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa for CKD-related anemia: two in dialysis-dependent (DD)-CKD and two in non-dialysis-dependent (NDD)-CKD. While vadadustat met prespecified noninferiority criteria for hematological efficacy globally, it did not meet noninferiority criteria for cardiovascular safety in the NDD-CKD trials. The trials considered regional differences in treatment practices, including hemoglobin targets within (10-11 g/dL) and outside the US (10-12 g/dL).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nTo examine region-specific outcomes, we performed prespecified analyses for US and non-US patient subgroups from the vadadustat global program. The primary safety end point was first occurrence of MACE (death from any cause, or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke). The primary efficacy end point was change in hemoglobin from baseline to average values during weeks 24-36.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n4084/7399 (55%) randomized patients were enrolled in the US. In pooled analyses of all US patients, MACE risk was similar among vadadustat-treated and darbepoetin alfa-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% CI 0.90-1.17). HRs were similar for US patients with DD-CKD (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.84-1.18) and NDD-CKD (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.87-1.29). In pooled analyses of non-US patients, MACE risk was numerically higher among vadadustat-treated patients (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94-1.33); the higher risk was primarily attributed to the NDD-CKD subgroup (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.03-1.60). In the non-US DD-CKD subgroup, MACE risk was similar among vadadustat-treated and darbepoetin alfa-treated patients (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.67-1.17). Changes in hemoglobin were similar among treatment groups in all regions, as were rates of treatment-emergent and serious adverse events.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn patients with DD-CKD, safety (vis-à-vis MACE) and efficacy (vis-à-vis change in hemoglobin) of vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa were similar when stratified by region (US versus non-US). In US patients with NDD-CKD, safety and efficacy of vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa were similar.","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Vadadustat's global clinical program was comprised of four noninferiority trials comparing vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa for CKD-related anemia: two in dialysis-dependent (DD)-CKD and two in non-dialysis-dependent (NDD)-CKD. While vadadustat met prespecified noninferiority criteria for hematological efficacy globally, it did not meet noninferiority criteria for cardiovascular safety in the NDD-CKD trials. The trials considered regional differences in treatment practices, including hemoglobin targets within (10-11 g/dL) and outside the US (10-12 g/dL). METHODS To examine region-specific outcomes, we performed prespecified analyses for US and non-US patient subgroups from the vadadustat global program. The primary safety end point was first occurrence of MACE (death from any cause, or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke). The primary efficacy end point was change in hemoglobin from baseline to average values during weeks 24-36. RESULTS 4084/7399 (55%) randomized patients were enrolled in the US. In pooled analyses of all US patients, MACE risk was similar among vadadustat-treated and darbepoetin alfa-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% CI 0.90-1.17). HRs were similar for US patients with DD-CKD (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.84-1.18) and NDD-CKD (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.87-1.29). In pooled analyses of non-US patients, MACE risk was numerically higher among vadadustat-treated patients (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94-1.33); the higher risk was primarily attributed to the NDD-CKD subgroup (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.03-1.60). In the non-US DD-CKD subgroup, MACE risk was similar among vadadustat-treated and darbepoetin alfa-treated patients (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.67-1.17). Changes in hemoglobin were similar among treatment groups in all regions, as were rates of treatment-emergent and serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In patients with DD-CKD, safety (vis-à-vis MACE) and efficacy (vis-à-vis change in hemoglobin) of vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa were similar when stratified by region (US versus non-US). In US patients with NDD-CKD, safety and efficacy of vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa were similar.
Vadadustat在美国国内外治疗ckd相关贫血的安全性和有效性
vadadustat的全球临床项目包括四项比较vadadustat和达贝泊汀治疗ckd相关贫血的非效性试验:两项用于透析依赖性(DD)-CKD,两项用于非透析依赖性(NDD)-CKD。虽然vadadustat在全球范围内符合预定的血液学疗效非劣效性标准,但在NDD-CKD试验中,它不符合心血管安全性的非劣效性标准。这些试验考虑了治疗实践的地区差异,包括美国境内(10-11 g/dL)和美国境外(10-12 g/dL)的血红蛋白目标。为了检查地区特异性结果,我们对来自vadadustat全球项目的美国和非美国患者亚组进行了预先指定的分析。主要安全终点是首次发生MACE(任何原因导致的死亡,或非致死性心肌梗死或卒中)。主要疗效终点是血红蛋白在24-36周内从基线值到平均值的变化。结果4084/7399例(55%)随机患者入组。在对所有美国患者的汇总分析中,瓦达杜司他治疗和达贝泊汀治疗患者的MACE风险相似(危险比[HR] 1.03;95% ci 0.90-1.17)。美国DD-CKD患者的HR相似(HR 1.00;95% CI 0.84-1.18)和NDD-CKD (HR 1.06;95% ci 0.87-1.29)。在非美国患者的汇总分析中,vadadusta治疗患者的MACE风险在数值上更高(HR 1.12;95% ci 0.94-1.33);较高的风险主要归因于NDD-CKD亚组(HR 1.29;95% ci 1.03-1.60)。在非美国DD-CKD亚组中,vadadusta治疗和darbepoetin治疗的患者MACE风险相似(HR 0.88;95% ci 0.67-1.17)。在所有地区的治疗组中,血红蛋白的变化是相似的,治疗后出现的发生率和严重不良事件发生率也是相似的。结论在DD-CKD患者中,按地区分层(美国与非美国),伐达司他和达贝泊汀的安全性(相对于-à-vis MACE)和有效性(相对于-à-vis血红蛋白变化)相似。在美国NDD-CKD患者中,vadadustat和darbepoetin的安全性和有效性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
492
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews. Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication. JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信