Consensus Recommendations for Sustainable and Equitable Neonatology Staffing: A Delphi Approach.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Milenka Cuevas Guaman,Christine E Bishop,Emily R Miller,Christiane E L Dammann,Kaashif A Ahmad,Eric Horowitz,Mark Hudak,Satyan Lakshminrusimha,Patrick J McNamara,Mark R Mercurio,Marielle Nguyen,De-Ann M Pillers,Robin H Steinhorn,Annemarie Stroustrup,Kerri Z Machut
{"title":"Consensus Recommendations for Sustainable and Equitable Neonatology Staffing: A Delphi Approach.","authors":"Milenka Cuevas Guaman,Christine E Bishop,Emily R Miller,Christiane E L Dammann,Kaashif A Ahmad,Eric Horowitz,Mark Hudak,Satyan Lakshminrusimha,Patrick J McNamara,Mark R Mercurio,Marielle Nguyen,De-Ann M Pillers,Robin H Steinhorn,Annemarie Stroustrup,Kerri Z Machut","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-069943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\r\nThe specialty of neonatology faces significant and growing challenges related to patient safety, physician well-being, and workforce sustainability that highlight the necessity for innovative work models. Our objective was to develop consensus recommendations to improve neonatologist staffing practices in the United States.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe used a modified Delphi process with 32 diverse subject-matter expert stakeholders to reach consensus. We derived 60 initial potential recommendations for improved staffing from the literature and our 2 previous studies of physician leaders. We defined consensus as 80% or higher agreement and strong consensus as 90% or higher agreement. We ultimately eliminated statements that achieved less than 80% consensus from the recommendations.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFifty-one individual statements reached consensus and were grouped into 24 final recommendations to improve neonatology staffing. Topics of focus included clinical allocations (eg, clinic work is counted in hours/year), shift characteristics (eg, clinical work after 24 hours is minimized), allocation of nonclinical work (eg, nonclinical work is accounted for in full-time equivalent), and staffing flexibility (eg, options to restructure clinical work are provided for specific circumstances such as aging and pregnancy). Significant discussion on many statements focused on ensuring that recommendations were both feasible and not overly prescriptive for individual institutions.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe reached consensus on a set of neonatologist staffing recommendations that emphasize the critical issues related to patient safety and physician well-being. Future work will focus on advocating for widespread implementation of these recommendations and evaluating their effect on patient safety, physician well-being, and sustainability of the neonatal workforce.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-069943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The specialty of neonatology faces significant and growing challenges related to patient safety, physician well-being, and workforce sustainability that highlight the necessity for innovative work models. Our objective was to develop consensus recommendations to improve neonatologist staffing practices in the United States. METHODS We used a modified Delphi process with 32 diverse subject-matter expert stakeholders to reach consensus. We derived 60 initial potential recommendations for improved staffing from the literature and our 2 previous studies of physician leaders. We defined consensus as 80% or higher agreement and strong consensus as 90% or higher agreement. We ultimately eliminated statements that achieved less than 80% consensus from the recommendations. RESULTS Fifty-one individual statements reached consensus and were grouped into 24 final recommendations to improve neonatology staffing. Topics of focus included clinical allocations (eg, clinic work is counted in hours/year), shift characteristics (eg, clinical work after 24 hours is minimized), allocation of nonclinical work (eg, nonclinical work is accounted for in full-time equivalent), and staffing flexibility (eg, options to restructure clinical work are provided for specific circumstances such as aging and pregnancy). Significant discussion on many statements focused on ensuring that recommendations were both feasible and not overly prescriptive for individual institutions. CONCLUSIONS We reached consensus on a set of neonatologist staffing recommendations that emphasize the critical issues related to patient safety and physician well-being. Future work will focus on advocating for widespread implementation of these recommendations and evaluating their effect on patient safety, physician well-being, and sustainability of the neonatal workforce.
可持续和公平的新生儿人员配置的共识建议:德尔菲方法。
背景与目的新生儿专科面临着与患者安全、医生福利和劳动力可持续性相关的重大挑战,这些挑战凸显了创新工作模式的必要性。我们的目标是制定共识建议,以改善美国新生儿医生的人员配置实践。方法采用改进的德尔菲法与32个不同主题的专家利益相关者达成共识。我们从文献和之前对医师领导的两项研究中得出了60项初步的潜在建议,以改善人员配备。我们将共识定义为80%或更高的共识,强共识定义为90%或更高的共识。我们最终从建议中剔除了达成不到80%共识的陈述。结果51项个人意见达成共识,并归纳为24项建议,以改善新生儿人员配置。重点主题包括临床分配(例如,临床工作以小时/年计算),轮班特征(例如,24小时后的临床工作最小化),非临床工作的分配(例如,非临床工作在全职工作中占比),以及人员配置灵活性(例如,为老年人和怀孕等特定情况提供重组临床工作的选择)。对许多发言的重要讨论集中于确保建议对个别机构既可行又不过于规定性。结论:我们就一套强调与患者安全和医生福祉相关的关键问题的新生儿专家人员配置建议达成了共识。未来的工作将侧重于倡导广泛实施这些建议,并评估其对患者安全、医生福祉和新生儿劳动力可持续性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信