Nikisha Patel, Vidya S. Vuruputoor, Nasim Rahmatpour, Yang Liu, Peter Szövényi, Bernard Goffinet, Jill L. Wegrzyn
{"title":"Immediate premeiotic transcriptomic effects following nonchemically induced whole genome duplication in the moss Funaria hygrometrica","authors":"Nikisha Patel, Vidya S. Vuruputoor, Nasim Rahmatpour, Yang Liu, Peter Szövényi, Bernard Goffinet, Jill L. Wegrzyn","doi":"10.1111/nph.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whole genome duplications (WGDs) have shaped the evolutionary history of land plants by driving innovation and diversification (One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative, <span>2019</span>; Heslop-Harrison <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Following such events, whether through genome doubling (autopolyploidy) or hybridization-driven merging (allopolyploidy), both DNA and histone methylation are activated. This activation triggers a rapid cascade of retroelement suppression and subsequent modifications to gene expression. Immediately following WGD, the total number of genes should be preserved (Birchler & Veitia, <span>2014</span>; Doyle & Coate, <span>2019</span>) such that shifts in expression would then be governed only by epigenetic processes. In studies examining gene dosage in autopolyploids (Yu <i>et al</i>., <span>2010</span>; Coate <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>; Song <i>et al</i>., <span>2020a</span>), genome doubling is frequently induced via colchicine treatment, which itself may influence transcriptomic outcomes (Münzbergová, <span>2017</span>). Additionally, these plants are typically assessed after at least one reproductive cycle, during which meiotic events could further shape gene expression. Genome doubling occurs naturally during key life cycle transitions, in the transition from haploid gametophyte to diploid sporophyte, and is associated with methylation changes that can modify or reset gene expression (Schmid <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>; Rensing <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>; Borg <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Rempfer <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). However, it remains unclear whether a WGD event triggered by a homoploid shift from sporophyte to gametophyte, known as apospory, can induce gene expression changes in the absence of chemical induction and before the epigenetic reprogramming associated with meiosis.</p><p>Mosses represent excellent model systems for investigating the immediate transcriptomic effects of WGD for several reasons. First, their life cycle includes two macroscopic, easily manipulable generations: a haploid vegetative gametophyte and a diploid sporophyte, allowing direct comparisons between ploidy levels. Second, isogenic diploid gametophytes can be reliably induced from immature diploid sporophytes through apospory (Bryan, <span>2001</span>), avoiding the confounding effects associated with chemical polyploidization methods such as a colchicine treatment (Münzbergová, <span>2017</span>; Zhou <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). And third, unlike in grass models, in which diploid apospory is rare and inconsistently expressed (Ortiz <i>et al</i>., <span>2013</span>), mosses provide a genetically stable and reproducible system for generating polyploid tissues. Additionally, their relatively simple body plan and compact genomes reduce the complexity of downstream transcriptomic analyses, making them an ideal system for studying the direct molecular consequences of WGD. Finally, gene expression in these aposporous diploid gametophytes (ADG, 2n) can be characterized immediately, that is before syngamy and meiosis resetting genetic programming.</p><p>Such moss experimental systems thus allow for the assessment of the transcriptomic impact of shifts in ploidy (e.g. haploid/diploid) vs in function (gametophyte/sporophyte) immediately following WGD in plants. Here, independent ADG (2n) are generated from sporophytes of the moss <i>Funaria hygrometrica</i> and their gene expression is contrasted against that of replicate parental haploid gametophytes and stages of the diploid (2n) sporophyte (Fig. 1a; Supporting Information Methods S1) to assess the immediate transcriptomic consequences. The observed differential gene expression is discussed in the context of long terminal repeats (LTRs) and methylation site distributions.</p><p>Cultures of <i>F. hygrometrica</i> (Funariaceae, <i>Budke</i> 145, CONN) were established from spores of a single sporophyte. As in the confamilial <i>Physcomitrium patens</i>, self-fertilization and, to a lesser extent, outcrossing likely drive sporophyte production in <i>F. hygrometrica</i> (Perroud <i>et al</i>., <span>2011</span>), and it is assumed that the original sporophyte emerged from self-fertilization, was thus homozygous, and yielded isogenic haploid spores. Gametophytes were cultured and propagated under standard conditions and induced to undergo sexual reproduction through cold treatment triggering gametangia formation and gametogenesis. Immature sporophytes were sampled and cut in half, and the top of the premeiotic unswollen young sporophyte was placed on Knops medium. RNA was extracted from three replicates of vegetative haploid and diploid cultures and four developmental premeiotic stages of the sporophyte. A total of 10 RNA libraries (representing three stages) were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500, and the resulting reads were aligned to the annotated chromosome-scale reference for <i>F. hygrometrica</i> (Kirbis <i>et al</i>., <span>2025</span>). Repeat elements were independently classified from the reference, and cytosine methylation patterns were quantified from the genomic nanopore reads in all three contexts: CG, CHG, and CHH (where H stands for A, T, or C). Extended methods are available in Methods S1.</p><p>Inducing a WGD via apospory triggers a significant, immediate, and largely consistent transcriptomic response in the moss <i>F. hygrometrica</i>. In the first aposporous diploid (2n) gametophytes, 14% of the total gene space exhibits a shift in expression, and the majority of these genes (i.e. 7% or 10% of total) are consistently expressed or not expressed vs in the haploid (n) gametophytes. The transcriptomic profile of aposporous diploid (2n) gametophytes combines not only the expression of genes otherwise specific to the wild sporophyte (2n) or gametophyte (n) but also a suite of genes not expressed in the wild generations, that is it holds signatures linked to ploidy and function as well as <i>de novo</i> expressions. Whole genome duplication thus immediately generates new transcriptomic profiles for selection to act on, thereby potentially catalyzing rapid divergence rather than merely enabling subsequent radiation (Schranz <i>et al</i>., <span>2012</span>) or escape from extinction (Van de Peer <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). Shifts in expression following WGD are largely governed by specific processes, given their repeatability across replicates, and likely involve changes in methylation in or near gene bodies and their associated LTRs, epigenetic processes known to largely shape plant development (Lucibelli <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). Contrasting the methylation landscapes of haploid (n) gametophytes, isogenic diploid (2n) sporophytes, and their aposporously derived diploid (2n) gametophytes across multiple generations will provide insights into the specific molecular mechanisms contributing to the observed gene expression profiles.</p><p>None declared.</p><p>BG and JLW designed the research. NR, VSV and NP generated and analyzed the data. YL and PS contributed data. BG wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors contributed to the final version. NP and VSV contributed equally to this work.</p><p>The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"247 1","pages":"24-32"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nph.70208","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.70208","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Whole genome duplications (WGDs) have shaped the evolutionary history of land plants by driving innovation and diversification (One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative, 2019; Heslop-Harrison et al., 2023). Following such events, whether through genome doubling (autopolyploidy) or hybridization-driven merging (allopolyploidy), both DNA and histone methylation are activated. This activation triggers a rapid cascade of retroelement suppression and subsequent modifications to gene expression. Immediately following WGD, the total number of genes should be preserved (Birchler & Veitia, 2014; Doyle & Coate, 2019) such that shifts in expression would then be governed only by epigenetic processes. In studies examining gene dosage in autopolyploids (Yu et al., 2010; Coate et al., 2020; Song et al., 2020a), genome doubling is frequently induced via colchicine treatment, which itself may influence transcriptomic outcomes (Münzbergová, 2017). Additionally, these plants are typically assessed after at least one reproductive cycle, during which meiotic events could further shape gene expression. Genome doubling occurs naturally during key life cycle transitions, in the transition from haploid gametophyte to diploid sporophyte, and is associated with methylation changes that can modify or reset gene expression (Schmid et al., 2018; Rensing et al., 2020; Borg et al., 2021; Rempfer et al., 2022). However, it remains unclear whether a WGD event triggered by a homoploid shift from sporophyte to gametophyte, known as apospory, can induce gene expression changes in the absence of chemical induction and before the epigenetic reprogramming associated with meiosis.
Mosses represent excellent model systems for investigating the immediate transcriptomic effects of WGD for several reasons. First, their life cycle includes two macroscopic, easily manipulable generations: a haploid vegetative gametophyte and a diploid sporophyte, allowing direct comparisons between ploidy levels. Second, isogenic diploid gametophytes can be reliably induced from immature diploid sporophytes through apospory (Bryan, 2001), avoiding the confounding effects associated with chemical polyploidization methods such as a colchicine treatment (Münzbergová, 2017; Zhou et al., 2017). And third, unlike in grass models, in which diploid apospory is rare and inconsistently expressed (Ortiz et al., 2013), mosses provide a genetically stable and reproducible system for generating polyploid tissues. Additionally, their relatively simple body plan and compact genomes reduce the complexity of downstream transcriptomic analyses, making them an ideal system for studying the direct molecular consequences of WGD. Finally, gene expression in these aposporous diploid gametophytes (ADG, 2n) can be characterized immediately, that is before syngamy and meiosis resetting genetic programming.
Such moss experimental systems thus allow for the assessment of the transcriptomic impact of shifts in ploidy (e.g. haploid/diploid) vs in function (gametophyte/sporophyte) immediately following WGD in plants. Here, independent ADG (2n) are generated from sporophytes of the moss Funaria hygrometrica and their gene expression is contrasted against that of replicate parental haploid gametophytes and stages of the diploid (2n) sporophyte (Fig. 1a; Supporting Information Methods S1) to assess the immediate transcriptomic consequences. The observed differential gene expression is discussed in the context of long terminal repeats (LTRs) and methylation site distributions.
Cultures of F. hygrometrica (Funariaceae, Budke 145, CONN) were established from spores of a single sporophyte. As in the confamilial Physcomitrium patens, self-fertilization and, to a lesser extent, outcrossing likely drive sporophyte production in F. hygrometrica (Perroud et al., 2011), and it is assumed that the original sporophyte emerged from self-fertilization, was thus homozygous, and yielded isogenic haploid spores. Gametophytes were cultured and propagated under standard conditions and induced to undergo sexual reproduction through cold treatment triggering gametangia formation and gametogenesis. Immature sporophytes were sampled and cut in half, and the top of the premeiotic unswollen young sporophyte was placed on Knops medium. RNA was extracted from three replicates of vegetative haploid and diploid cultures and four developmental premeiotic stages of the sporophyte. A total of 10 RNA libraries (representing three stages) were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500, and the resulting reads were aligned to the annotated chromosome-scale reference for F. hygrometrica (Kirbis et al., 2025). Repeat elements were independently classified from the reference, and cytosine methylation patterns were quantified from the genomic nanopore reads in all three contexts: CG, CHG, and CHH (where H stands for A, T, or C). Extended methods are available in Methods S1.
Inducing a WGD via apospory triggers a significant, immediate, and largely consistent transcriptomic response in the moss F. hygrometrica. In the first aposporous diploid (2n) gametophytes, 14% of the total gene space exhibits a shift in expression, and the majority of these genes (i.e. 7% or 10% of total) are consistently expressed or not expressed vs in the haploid (n) gametophytes. The transcriptomic profile of aposporous diploid (2n) gametophytes combines not only the expression of genes otherwise specific to the wild sporophyte (2n) or gametophyte (n) but also a suite of genes not expressed in the wild generations, that is it holds signatures linked to ploidy and function as well as de novo expressions. Whole genome duplication thus immediately generates new transcriptomic profiles for selection to act on, thereby potentially catalyzing rapid divergence rather than merely enabling subsequent radiation (Schranz et al., 2012) or escape from extinction (Van de Peer et al., 2021). Shifts in expression following WGD are largely governed by specific processes, given their repeatability across replicates, and likely involve changes in methylation in or near gene bodies and their associated LTRs, epigenetic processes known to largely shape plant development (Lucibelli et al., 2022). Contrasting the methylation landscapes of haploid (n) gametophytes, isogenic diploid (2n) sporophytes, and their aposporously derived diploid (2n) gametophytes across multiple generations will provide insights into the specific molecular mechanisms contributing to the observed gene expression profiles.
None declared.
BG and JLW designed the research. NR, VSV and NP generated and analyzed the data. YL and PS contributed data. BG wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors contributed to the final version. NP and VSV contributed equally to this work.
The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.
全基因组复制(WGDs)通过推动创新和多样化,塑造了陆地植物的进化史(一千种植物转录组计划,2019;Heslop-Harrison et al., 2023)。在这些事件之后,无论是通过基因组加倍(自多倍体)还是杂交驱动合并(异源多倍体),DNA和组蛋白甲基化都被激活。这种激活触发了逆转录因子抑制和随后的基因表达修饰的快速级联反应。WGD后立即保存基因总数(Birchler &;Veitia, 2014;柯南道尔,Coate, 2019),这样表达的变化就只受表观遗传过程的控制。在检测自多倍体基因剂量的研究中(Yu et al., 2010;Coate et al., 2020;Song et al., 2020a),基因组加倍经常通过秋水仙碱治疗诱导,这本身可能影响转录组学结果(m<s:1> nzbergov<e:1>, 2017)。此外,这些植物通常在至少一个生殖周期后进行评估,在此期间减数分裂事件可以进一步塑造基因表达。基因组加倍在关键的生命周期转变中自然发生,在从单倍体配子体到二倍体孢子体的转变中,并与甲基化变化相关,甲基化变化可以修饰或重置基因表达(Schmid等人,2018;Rensing et al., 2020;Borg et al., 2021;Rempfer et al., 2022)。然而,在没有化学诱导的情况下,在减数分裂相关的表观遗传重编程之前,由孢子体向配子体的同倍体转变(即孢子体)引发的WGD事件是否能诱导基因表达变化,目前尚不清楚。苔藓为研究WGD的直接转录组效应提供了极好的模型系统,原因有几个。首先,它们的生命周期包括两个宏观的、易于操作的世代:一个单倍体营养配子体和一个二倍体孢子体,允许在倍性水平之间进行直接比较。其次,等基因二倍体配子体可以通过孢子囊可靠地从未成熟的二倍体孢子体中诱导出来(Bryan, 2001),避免了秋水仙碱处理等化学多倍体化方法带来的混淆效应(m<s:1> nzbergov<e:1>, 2017;周等人,2017)。第三,与二倍体孢子罕见且表达不一致的禾草模型不同(Ortiz et al., 2013),苔藓为多倍体组织的产生提供了一个遗传稳定且可复制的系统。此外,它们相对简单的身体结构和紧凑的基因组降低了下游转录组学分析的复杂性,使它们成为研究WGD直接分子后果的理想系统。最后,这些无孢子二倍体配子体(ADG, 2n)中的基因表达可以立即表征,即在合子和减数分裂重置遗传程序之前。因此,这种苔藓实验系统允许评估植物在WGD后立即发生的倍性(例如单倍体/二倍体)与功能(配子体/孢子体)变化的转录组学影响。在这里,独立的ADG (2n)是由湿藓的孢子体产生的,它们的基因表达与复制亲本单倍体配子体和二倍体孢子体(2n)的阶段进行了对比(图1a;支持信息方法S1)评估即时转录组的结果。在长末端重复序列(LTRs)和甲基化位点分布的背景下讨论了观察到的差异基因表达。湿法真菌(Funariaceae, Budke 145, CONN)从单个孢子体的孢子中培养。与家族性的patens Physcomitrium一样,自交受精和在较小程度上的异交可能推动了F. hygrometrica孢子体的产生(Perroud et al., 2011),并且假设最初的孢子体是从自交受精中产生的,因此是纯合子的,并产生了等基因单倍体孢子。配子体在标准条件下培养繁殖,通过冷处理诱导有性繁殖,触发配子体形成和配子体发生。取未成熟孢子体为样本,切成两半,将未膨大的早熟孢子体顶部置于Knops培养基上。从营养单倍体和二倍体培养的3个重复和孢子体发育的4个早减数分裂阶段提取RNA。在Illumina NextSeq 500上对总共10个RNA文库(代表三个阶段)进行测序,并将结果与带注释的F. hygrometrica染色体尺度参考序列比对(Kirbis et al., 2025)。重复元件从参考文献中独立分类,胞嘧啶甲基化模式从基因组纳米孔读取所有三种情况:CG, CHG和CHH(其中H代表A, T或C)中定量。扩展方法在方法S1中可用。 通过孢子诱导WGD在苔F. hygrometrica中触发了显著的、直接的、基本一致的转录组反应。在第一个无孢子二倍体(2n)配子体中,总基因空间的14%表现出表达转移,而这些基因中的大多数(即总基因的7%或10%)在单倍体(n)配子体中一致表达或不表达。无孢子二倍体(2n)配子体的转录组学特征不仅结合了野生孢子体(2n)或配子体(n)特有的基因表达,而且还结合了一套在野生代中未表达的基因,即它具有与倍性和功能以及新生表达相关的特征。因此,全基因组复制立即产生新的转录组谱供选择作用,从而可能催化快速分化,而不仅仅是使后续辐射(Schranz等人,2012)或免于灭绝(Van de Peer等人,2021)。WGD后的表达变化在很大程度上受特定过程的控制,考虑到它们在重复中的可重复性,并且可能涉及基因体及其相关ltr内或附近甲基化的变化,已知表观遗传过程在很大程度上影响植物发育(Lucibelli et al., 2022)。对比单倍体(n)配子体、等基因二倍体(2n)孢子体及其非孢子衍生的二倍体(2n)配子体的多代甲基化景观,将有助于深入了解导致所观察到的基因表达谱的特定分子机制。没有宣布。BG和JLW设计了这项研究。NR, VSV和NP生成并分析数据。YL和PS提供了数据。BG撰写了论文的初稿。所有作者都对最终版本做出了贡献。NP和VSV对这项工作贡献相同。新植物学家基金会对地图和任何机构的管辖权要求保持中立。
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.