Pieter J Colin,Lynn H Bichajian,Valentin R Curt,Jeroen V Koomen,Thomas Stöhr,Michel M R F Struys,Keira P Mason
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam for procedural sedation in children and adolescents.","authors":"Pieter J Colin,Lynn H Bichajian,Valentin R Curt,Jeroen V Koomen,Thomas Stöhr,Michel M R F Struys,Keira P Mason","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION\r\nRemimazolam is not approved for use in pediatric patients. The pharmacokinetics of remimazolam have been reported to be similar to those of adult patients after scaling for body size. This manuscript reports on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pediatric patients aged ≥6 to ≤18 years and a subsequent model-based optimization of the used dosing regimen.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\n31 patients were included in the trial and stratified across four treatment arms: bolus administration, infusion, bolus + fentanyl or infusion + fentanyl. The University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) was used to assess the depth of sedation. Blood samples were drawn to measure the concentrations of remimazolam and its metabolite CNS7054. Population pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modelling was performed in NONMEM ®.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA population pharmacokinetic model was developed for remimazolam and CNS7054. The elimination clearance of remimazolam was 0.70 L.min -1.70kg -1. A proportional odds model combined with a simplified Minto model described the observed UMSS well. The EC50 of remimazolam for UMSS ≥3 was 777 ng.ml -1 in the absence of fentanyl, and decreased to 655, 533, and 287 ng/ml for concomitant fentanyl steady-state concentrations of 1, 2, or 4 ng.ml -1, respectively. Simulations confirmed that the studied dosing regimen resulted in 9.2 to 22.0% of patients not reaching UMSS ≥3 at the end of the induction. Model-based optimization resulted in higher per kg dosages and the removal of the maximum allowable dose. Simulations indicated that the percentage of patients achieving UMSS ≥3 can be expected to be high (88% to 97%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study has shown that the pharmacokinetics of remimazolam are likely different between children ≥6 years old and adults (after correcting for size). In addition, the exposure-response relationship shows that to effectively use remimazolam for procedural sedation in children ≥6 years, the dosing regimen should be modified to allow for higher remimazolam exposures.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION
Remimazolam is not approved for use in pediatric patients. The pharmacokinetics of remimazolam have been reported to be similar to those of adult patients after scaling for body size. This manuscript reports on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pediatric patients aged ≥6 to ≤18 years and a subsequent model-based optimization of the used dosing regimen.
METHODS
31 patients were included in the trial and stratified across four treatment arms: bolus administration, infusion, bolus + fentanyl or infusion + fentanyl. The University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) was used to assess the depth of sedation. Blood samples were drawn to measure the concentrations of remimazolam and its metabolite CNS7054. Population pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modelling was performed in NONMEM ®.
RESULTS
A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for remimazolam and CNS7054. The elimination clearance of remimazolam was 0.70 L.min -1.70kg -1. A proportional odds model combined with a simplified Minto model described the observed UMSS well. The EC50 of remimazolam for UMSS ≥3 was 777 ng.ml -1 in the absence of fentanyl, and decreased to 655, 533, and 287 ng/ml for concomitant fentanyl steady-state concentrations of 1, 2, or 4 ng.ml -1, respectively. Simulations confirmed that the studied dosing regimen resulted in 9.2 to 22.0% of patients not reaching UMSS ≥3 at the end of the induction. Model-based optimization resulted in higher per kg dosages and the removal of the maximum allowable dose. Simulations indicated that the percentage of patients achieving UMSS ≥3 can be expected to be high (88% to 97%).
CONCLUSIONS
This study has shown that the pharmacokinetics of remimazolam are likely different between children ≥6 years old and adults (after correcting for size). In addition, the exposure-response relationship shows that to effectively use remimazolam for procedural sedation in children ≥6 years, the dosing regimen should be modified to allow for higher remimazolam exposures.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.