Characterization of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction - insights from DECAAF II.
{"title":"Characterization of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction - insights from DECAAF II.","authors":"Ala Assaf,Han Feng,Mayana Bsoul,Ghassan Bidaoui,Hadi Younes,Christian Massad,Mario Mekhael,Charbel Noujaim,Omar Kreidieh,Swati Rao,Amitabh Pandey,Philipp Sommer,Christian Mahnkopf,Nassir Marrouche,Christian Sohns","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nAtrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in heart failure reduces mortality and hospitalizations and improves ejection fraction. Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is diagnosed after complete recovery of left ventricular systolic function after ablation. We aimed to identify the prevalence and pre-ablation predictors of AIC among patients with AF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).\r\n\r\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\r\nWe utilized the DECAAF II database, where 815 patients with persistent AF underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic-resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) before and 3 months after AF ablation. We only included patients with available left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LVSD. AF burden was continuously monitored. AIC was defined as LVSD and coexisting AF in patients with ejection fraction improvement to ≥50% following ablation. We identified 119 patients with LVSD and AF with a mean LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.8% and mean baseline fibrosis of 20.0 ± 7.3%. Mean AF burden post-ablation was 16.8 ± 20.2%, and mean LVEF recovery was 13.9 percentage points. Seventy-two patients (60.5%) fulfilled the criteria for AIC, and 47 (39.5%) did not. AIC patients had a mean baseline LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.9% (vs. 39.2 ± 7.9% in non-AIC patients; p = 0.9), a significantly lower percentage of fibrosis in the left atrial septal wall (12.2 ± 10.0% vs. 20.7 ± 11.4% in non-AIC patients, p < 0.001). Additionally, LVEF improvement was correlated with lower AF burden post-ablation (r = -0.23, p = 0.02).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn this post-hoc analysis of the DECAAF II trial, we found that the majority of patients with LVSD and persistent AF have AIC rather than primary cardiomyopathy. We identified LGE-CMR as a differentiator between AIC and other cardiomyopathies.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIMS
Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in heart failure reduces mortality and hospitalizations and improves ejection fraction. Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is diagnosed after complete recovery of left ventricular systolic function after ablation. We aimed to identify the prevalence and pre-ablation predictors of AIC among patients with AF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
METHODS AND RESULTS
We utilized the DECAAF II database, where 815 patients with persistent AF underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic-resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) before and 3 months after AF ablation. We only included patients with available left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LVSD. AF burden was continuously monitored. AIC was defined as LVSD and coexisting AF in patients with ejection fraction improvement to ≥50% following ablation. We identified 119 patients with LVSD and AF with a mean LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.8% and mean baseline fibrosis of 20.0 ± 7.3%. Mean AF burden post-ablation was 16.8 ± 20.2%, and mean LVEF recovery was 13.9 percentage points. Seventy-two patients (60.5%) fulfilled the criteria for AIC, and 47 (39.5%) did not. AIC patients had a mean baseline LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.9% (vs. 39.2 ± 7.9% in non-AIC patients; p = 0.9), a significantly lower percentage of fibrosis in the left atrial septal wall (12.2 ± 10.0% vs. 20.7 ± 11.4% in non-AIC patients, p < 0.001). Additionally, LVEF improvement was correlated with lower AF burden post-ablation (r = -0.23, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
In this post-hoc analysis of the DECAAF II trial, we found that the majority of patients with LVSD and persistent AF have AIC rather than primary cardiomyopathy. We identified LGE-CMR as a differentiator between AIC and other cardiomyopathies.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.