{"title":"Advancing a Sustainable Foundation for Cybersecurity","authors":"Kevin M. Morley","doi":"10.1002/awwa.2447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Myriad criminal and foreign actors are targeting water and other critical infrastructure systems. To date, acknowledged cyberattacks have not inspired action in the water sector as much as experts in national security and cybercrime believe is needed. Moreover, the risks that cybersecurity gaps pose to core water system functions do not appear to be adequately recognized.</p><p>The attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, led to a heavy emphasis on physical security solutions. While needed, this emphasis occurred to the detriment of needs related to cybersecurity and preparedness. The physical security improvements provided multiple benefits, but opportunities were missed to make similar investments for building resilience to sustain water systems’ continuity of service. The 2018 amendments to §1433 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) intended to correct this imbalance by requiring systems to evaluate threats from both malevolent acts and natural hazards, recognizing that the latter have a significantly higher likelihood of occurring in any given day or year.</p><p>Today, there is nearly a 100% probability that every water system, regardless of type or size, is at risk of such attacks. Consequently, adequate prioritization of cybersecurity risk management is essential to utility leadership meeting their fiduciary duty to their ratepayers.</p><p>Beyond this obligation, there are legal “motivators” to act responsibly. SDWA §1433 obligates covered systems to consider cyberthreats to the full gamut of information and operational technology deployed. Section 1433 goes on to require covered systems to have “strategies and resources to improve the resilience of the system.” This statutory expectation applies to both physical security and cybersecurity.</p><p>AWWA's cybersecurity guidance and assessment tool have provided a structured approach tailored to identifying what cyber vulnerabilities have the highest priority based on how a system uses technology. Recent revisions provide an updated approach that begins with cybersecurity fundamentals—“the first mile”—that will provide the most immediate risk-reduction value to systems where those measures are not already implemented.</p><p>AWWA's <i>State of the Water Industry Report</i> demonstrates that awareness of cyberthreats is higher than it has ever been, rising in the past several years to consistently rank in the top 10 utility manager concerns. Progress indeed, but not enough to convince various federal decision makers that enough has been done. There are recurring calls for greater regulatory oversight and enforcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or states. AWWA and partners are supporting policy initiatives designed to provide a sound footing for sensible, risk-based cybersecurity measures in the sector that include additional funding, technical assistance, and enhanced information-sharing.</p><p>AWWA also supports H.R. 2594, the Water Risk and Resilience Organization (WRRO) Establishment Act, which authorizes an independent, nongovernmental organization to develop minimum cybersecurity requirements for the water sector, with EPA oversight. The WRRO is modeled on provisions in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which led to the designation of the National Electric Reliability Corporation as an Electric Reliability Organization with oversight by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. This type of sector-led governance structure was examined in a 2021 report prepared for AWWA and later highlighted in recommendations prepared by The Foundation for Defense of Democracies for congressional consideration to address concerns identified by the Cyberspace Solarium Commission.</p><p>A sector-led model is essential to ensure direct engagement by water system owners, operators, and subject-matter experts in the development of cybersecurity requirements that can be “right-sized” to the needs of water systems. The sector is well aware of the limitations of one-size-fits-all regulatory structures. The WRRO provides an opportunity for the sector to manage cybersecurity in a manner that builds and enhances cyber-security maturity.</p><p>Not only has legislation been introduced to establish a WRRO, but the sector has also been successful in promoting the introduction of bills to support the cybersecurity improvements in other ways. Companion bills, H.R.2109 and S.1018, would provide funding for circuit riders that support implementation of cybersecurity best practices at small systems. H.R.2344 would support improving water systems’ access to threat intelligence and information-sharing. The active support of the sector for these bills is essential to their passage into law and advancing a sustainable foundation improving water sector cybersecurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14785,"journal":{"name":"Journal ‐ American Water Works Association","volume":"117 5","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/awwa.2447","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal ‐ American Water Works Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/awwa.2447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Myriad criminal and foreign actors are targeting water and other critical infrastructure systems. To date, acknowledged cyberattacks have not inspired action in the water sector as much as experts in national security and cybercrime believe is needed. Moreover, the risks that cybersecurity gaps pose to core water system functions do not appear to be adequately recognized.
The attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, led to a heavy emphasis on physical security solutions. While needed, this emphasis occurred to the detriment of needs related to cybersecurity and preparedness. The physical security improvements provided multiple benefits, but opportunities were missed to make similar investments for building resilience to sustain water systems’ continuity of service. The 2018 amendments to §1433 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) intended to correct this imbalance by requiring systems to evaluate threats from both malevolent acts and natural hazards, recognizing that the latter have a significantly higher likelihood of occurring in any given day or year.
Today, there is nearly a 100% probability that every water system, regardless of type or size, is at risk of such attacks. Consequently, adequate prioritization of cybersecurity risk management is essential to utility leadership meeting their fiduciary duty to their ratepayers.
Beyond this obligation, there are legal “motivators” to act responsibly. SDWA §1433 obligates covered systems to consider cyberthreats to the full gamut of information and operational technology deployed. Section 1433 goes on to require covered systems to have “strategies and resources to improve the resilience of the system.” This statutory expectation applies to both physical security and cybersecurity.
AWWA's cybersecurity guidance and assessment tool have provided a structured approach tailored to identifying what cyber vulnerabilities have the highest priority based on how a system uses technology. Recent revisions provide an updated approach that begins with cybersecurity fundamentals—“the first mile”—that will provide the most immediate risk-reduction value to systems where those measures are not already implemented.
AWWA's State of the Water Industry Report demonstrates that awareness of cyberthreats is higher than it has ever been, rising in the past several years to consistently rank in the top 10 utility manager concerns. Progress indeed, but not enough to convince various federal decision makers that enough has been done. There are recurring calls for greater regulatory oversight and enforcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or states. AWWA and partners are supporting policy initiatives designed to provide a sound footing for sensible, risk-based cybersecurity measures in the sector that include additional funding, technical assistance, and enhanced information-sharing.
AWWA also supports H.R. 2594, the Water Risk and Resilience Organization (WRRO) Establishment Act, which authorizes an independent, nongovernmental organization to develop minimum cybersecurity requirements for the water sector, with EPA oversight. The WRRO is modeled on provisions in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which led to the designation of the National Electric Reliability Corporation as an Electric Reliability Organization with oversight by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. This type of sector-led governance structure was examined in a 2021 report prepared for AWWA and later highlighted in recommendations prepared by The Foundation for Defense of Democracies for congressional consideration to address concerns identified by the Cyberspace Solarium Commission.
A sector-led model is essential to ensure direct engagement by water system owners, operators, and subject-matter experts in the development of cybersecurity requirements that can be “right-sized” to the needs of water systems. The sector is well aware of the limitations of one-size-fits-all regulatory structures. The WRRO provides an opportunity for the sector to manage cybersecurity in a manner that builds and enhances cyber-security maturity.
Not only has legislation been introduced to establish a WRRO, but the sector has also been successful in promoting the introduction of bills to support the cybersecurity improvements in other ways. Companion bills, H.R.2109 and S.1018, would provide funding for circuit riders that support implementation of cybersecurity best practices at small systems. H.R.2344 would support improving water systems’ access to threat intelligence and information-sharing. The active support of the sector for these bills is essential to their passage into law and advancing a sustainable foundation improving water sector cybersecurity.
无数的犯罪分子和外国行动者正在瞄准供水和其他关键基础设施系统。迄今为止,公认的网络攻击并没有像国家安全和网络犯罪专家认为的那样,激发水务部门采取行动。此外,网络安全缺口对核心水系统功能构成的风险似乎没有得到充分认识。2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击导致了对物理安全解决方案的高度重视。虽然有必要,但这种强调损害了与网络安全和准备相关的需求。物理安全方面的改进提供了多种好处,但错失了在建设恢复力以维持供水系统服务连续性方面进行类似投资的机会。2018年对《安全饮用水法》(SDWA)第1433条的修正案旨在纠正这种不平衡,要求系统评估来自恶意行为和自然灾害的威胁,并认识到后者在任何给定日期或年份发生的可能性要高得多。今天,几乎有100%的可能性,每个供水系统,无论类型或规模,都面临着这种攻击的风险。因此,网络安全风险管理的适当优先级对于公用事业领导层履行其对纳税人的信托责任至关重要。除了这一义务之外,还有法律上的“激励因素”促使人们采取负责任的行动。SDWA§1433要求所涵盖的系统考虑所部署的信息和操作技术的全部范围的网络威胁。第1433节继续要求所涵盖的系统具有“提高系统弹性的策略和资源”。这一法定期望适用于物理安全和网络安全。AWWA的网络安全指导和评估工具提供了一种结构化的方法,可以根据系统使用技术的方式来确定哪些网络漏洞具有最高的优先级。最近的修订提供了一种更新的方法,从网络安全基础开始,即“第一英里”,这将为那些尚未实施这些措施的系统提供最直接的风险降低价值。AWWA的水务行业现状报告显示,人们对网络威胁的意识比以往任何时候都要高,在过去的几年里,网络威胁一直是公用事业经理关注的十大问题之一。确实取得了进展,但还不足以让各个联邦决策者相信已经做得够多了。要求美国环境保护署(EPA)或各州加强监管和执法的呼声一再出现。AWWA和合作伙伴正在支持政策举措,旨在为该行业明智的、基于风险的网络安全措施提供坚实的基础,包括额外的资金、技术援助和增强的信息共享。AWWA还支持H.R. 2594《水风险与恢复组织(WRRO)建立法案》,该法案授权一个独立的非政府组织在EPA的监督下制定水务部门的最低网络安全要求。WRRO以2005年能源政策法案的规定为蓝本,该法案将国家电力可靠性公司指定为由联邦能源管理委员会监督的电力可靠性组织。这种由部门主导的治理结构在为AWWA编写的2021年报告中进行了审查,后来在捍卫民主基金会(The Foundation for Defense of Democracies)为国会审议的建议中得到强调,以解决网络空间日光浴室委员会(Cyberspace Solarium Commission)提出的问题。部门主导的模式对于确保供水系统所有者、运营商和主题专家直接参与网络安全要求的制定至关重要,这些要求可以“适当”地满足供水系统的需求。该行业非常清楚“一刀切”的监管结构的局限性。WRRO为该部门提供了一个以建立和增强网络安全成熟度的方式管理网络安全的机会。不仅立法建立了WRRO,而且该行业还成功地推动了法案的引入,以其他方式支持网络安全改进。配套法案H.R.2109和S.1018将为支持在小型系统中实施网络安全最佳实践的电路骑手提供资金。H.R.2344将支持改善供水系统获取威胁情报和信息共享的途径。该部门对这些法案的积极支持对于其通过成为法律和推进可持续基础至关重要,可以改善水务部门的网络安全。
期刊介绍:
Journal AWWA serves as the voice of the water industry and is an authoritative source of information for water professionals and the communities they serve. Journal AWWA provides an international forum for the industry’s thought and practice leaders to share their perspectives and experiences with the goal of continuous improvement of all water systems. Journal AWWA publishes articles about the water industry’s innovations, trends, controversies, and challenges, covering subjects such as public works planning, infrastructure management, human health, environmental protection, finance, and law. Journal AWWA will continue its long history of publishing in-depth and innovative articles on protecting the safety of our water, the reliability and resilience of our water systems, and the health of our environment and communities.