Impact of Soil–Structure Interaction Modeling Simplifications and Structural Nonlinearity on Uncertainty in EDPs: A Case Study on an Existing RC Building in Santiago

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Alberto Hurtado Valdés, Eduardo Torres, Guido Camata, Massimo Petracca, Jorge G. F. Crempien, José A. Abell
{"title":"Impact of Soil–Structure Interaction Modeling Simplifications and Structural Nonlinearity on Uncertainty in EDPs: A Case Study on an Existing RC Building in Santiago","authors":"Alberto Hurtado Valdés,&nbsp;Eduardo Torres,&nbsp;Guido Camata,&nbsp;Massimo Petracca,&nbsp;Jorge G. F. Crempien,&nbsp;José A. Abell","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study investigates the impact of modeling simplifications on the uncertainty of seismic response in numerical simulations, focusing on a five-story, asymmetric-plan, reinforced-concrete building in Santiago, Chile, subjected to simulated seismic motions from hypothetical events at the San Ramón fault (SRF). In order to achieve this, a comparative analysis is conducted between a high-complexity reference model and lower-complexity models. The reference model incorporates three-dimensional seismic inputs using the domain reduction method (DRM) and a detailed structural model accounting for material nonlinear behavior. The complexity of the models is systematically reduced to assess the effects of different soil–structure interaction (SSI) modeling assumptions. These assumptions include the use of DRM and plane-wave (PW) input, and also the exclusion of SSI through fixed-base (FB) conditions. For each model, both linear and nonlinear material behaviors are considered. Given the lack of historical records from the SRF, the study employs source-to-structure physical simulation to address seismic performance evaluation as well as its sensitivity to modeling. Simulations are conducted in OpenSees using input motions from 10 realizations of a <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>w</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>6.7</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$M_w = 6.7$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> event at the SRF, generated with the <span>ShakerMaker</span> Python library. With respect to the reference model, findings indicate that PW assumptions moderately increase uncertainty across different engineering demand parameters (EDPs) and analysis directions. Conversely, FB conditions significantly elevate modeling uncertainty, drastically changing the mean and variance of computed EDPs. A simple EDP sensitivity score is proposed to compare the statistics of computed EDPs, from which a global performance-score is constructed for ranking of models with respect to the reference model. The ranking shows that linear FB models may outperform non-linear FB models, highlighting a complex and nonintuitive relationship between structural nonlinearity and soil flexibility modeling on uncertainty. There are also indications that high-complexity modeling, accounting for the spatio-temporal complexities of the seismic wave-field through the DRM, is needed for responses quantities sensitive to high frequencies. Overall, it is shown that even for this realistic building, located on a very stiff soil, the effects of SSI cannot be neglected as this can produce unpredictable changes in mean and variance of computed EDPs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 8","pages":"2062-2083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of modeling simplifications on the uncertainty of seismic response in numerical simulations, focusing on a five-story, asymmetric-plan, reinforced-concrete building in Santiago, Chile, subjected to simulated seismic motions from hypothetical events at the San Ramón fault (SRF). In order to achieve this, a comparative analysis is conducted between a high-complexity reference model and lower-complexity models. The reference model incorporates three-dimensional seismic inputs using the domain reduction method (DRM) and a detailed structural model accounting for material nonlinear behavior. The complexity of the models is systematically reduced to assess the effects of different soil–structure interaction (SSI) modeling assumptions. These assumptions include the use of DRM and plane-wave (PW) input, and also the exclusion of SSI through fixed-base (FB) conditions. For each model, both linear and nonlinear material behaviors are considered. Given the lack of historical records from the SRF, the study employs source-to-structure physical simulation to address seismic performance evaluation as well as its sensitivity to modeling. Simulations are conducted in OpenSees using input motions from 10 realizations of a M w = 6.7 $M_w = 6.7$ event at the SRF, generated with the ShakerMaker Python library. With respect to the reference model, findings indicate that PW assumptions moderately increase uncertainty across different engineering demand parameters (EDPs) and analysis directions. Conversely, FB conditions significantly elevate modeling uncertainty, drastically changing the mean and variance of computed EDPs. A simple EDP sensitivity score is proposed to compare the statistics of computed EDPs, from which a global performance-score is constructed for ranking of models with respect to the reference model. The ranking shows that linear FB models may outperform non-linear FB models, highlighting a complex and nonintuitive relationship between structural nonlinearity and soil flexibility modeling on uncertainty. There are also indications that high-complexity modeling, accounting for the spatio-temporal complexities of the seismic wave-field through the DRM, is needed for responses quantities sensitive to high frequencies. Overall, it is shown that even for this realistic building, located on a very stiff soil, the effects of SSI cannot be neglected as this can produce unpredictable changes in mean and variance of computed EDPs.

土-结构相互作用模型简化和结构非线性对EDPs不确定性的影响——以圣地亚哥现有RC建筑为例
本研究探讨了模拟简化对数值模拟中地震反应不确定性的影响,重点研究了智利圣地亚哥的一栋五层不对称平面钢筋混凝土建筑,该建筑受到来自San Ramón断层(SRF)假设事件的模拟地震运动的影响。为此,对高复杂度参考模型和低复杂度参考模型进行了对比分析。参考模型结合了三维地震输入,采用了域简化法(DRM)和详细的结构模型,考虑了材料的非线性行为。系统地简化了模型的复杂性,以评估不同土-结构相互作用(SSI)模型假设的影响。这些假设包括使用DRM和平面波(PW)输入,以及通过固定基(FB)条件排除SSI。每个模型都考虑了材料的线性和非线性行为。由于缺乏SRF的历史记录,该研究采用了震源到结构的物理模拟来解决地震性能评估及其对建模的敏感性。在OpenSees中,使用SRF中M w = 6.7$ M_w = 6.7$事件的10个实现的输入运动进行模拟,这些运动是由ShakerMaker Python库生成的。对于参考模型,研究结果表明,PW假设适度增加了不同工程需求参数(EDPs)和分析方向的不确定性。相反,FB条件显著提高了模型的不确定性,极大地改变了计算edp的平均值和方差。提出了一个简单的EDP敏感性评分来比较计算EDP的统计量,并以此构建一个全局性能评分来对模型相对于参考模型进行排序。这一排名表明,线性土壤弹性模型可能优于非线性土壤弹性模型,突出了结构非线性与不确定性土壤弹性模型之间复杂而非直观的关系。也有迹象表明,考虑到通过DRM的地震波场的时空复杂性的高复杂性建模,需要对高频敏感的响应量。总体而言,研究表明,即使对于这个位于非常坚硬土壤上的现实建筑,SSI的影响也不能忽视,因为这可能会导致计算edp的平均值和方差发生不可预测的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信