Volunteers Sample Where Endangered Bumble Bees Occur: Model-Based Triage of Preferential Sampling in Multi-Species or Integrated Distribution Models

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
John D. J. Clare, Benjamin Zuckerberg, Laura A. Nunes, James Strange, Rich Hatfield, Claudio Gratton
{"title":"Volunteers Sample Where Endangered Bumble Bees Occur: Model-Based Triage of Preferential Sampling in Multi-Species or Integrated Distribution Models","authors":"John D. J. Clare,&nbsp;Benjamin Zuckerberg,&nbsp;Laura A. Nunes,&nbsp;James Strange,&nbsp;Rich Hatfield,&nbsp;Claudio Gratton","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Many broad-scale ecological inventory and monitoring efforts collect multi-species (or otherwise multivariate) data under unstructured study designs. Unstructured designs are vulnerable to preferential sampling, where residual covariance between locations selected for sampling and the response variable of interest may render predictions strongly biased.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Innovation</h3>\n \n <p>We extend previous work to address preferential sampling in spatial single-species distribution models to a multivariate context. Using spatially structured latent variables to approximate residual covariance between species occurrence probabilities and sampling inclusion probabilities, we present ways to account for sampling that may be preferential to varying degrees across multiple species, where (analogously) multiple datastreams might be preferential to varying degrees for a single species, or both. We use simulation to explore our proposed model and present an application that delineates the distributions of 13 bumble bee species across Wisconsin, USA and evaluates evidence for preferential sampling within 3 citizen science datastreams.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation results suggest that our proposed model improves out-of-sample predictions of species occurrence or richness when the sampling design is preferential and residual covariance between sampling and species occurrence exhibits spatial structure compatible with model assumptions, reducing bias in predictions of species occurrence or richness. Empirically, volunteers appeared to sample preferentially with respect to bumble bee distributions, being more likely to sample in locations where the federally listed <i>Bombus affinis</i> was more likely to occur. Our approach enables practitioners a means to triage preferential sampling within increasingly popular multi-species or integrated distribution models and can be modified slightly to deal with a variety of other response variables.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Many broad-scale ecological inventory and monitoring efforts collect multi-species (or otherwise multivariate) data under unstructured study designs. Unstructured designs are vulnerable to preferential sampling, where residual covariance between locations selected for sampling and the response variable of interest may render predictions strongly biased.

Innovation

We extend previous work to address preferential sampling in spatial single-species distribution models to a multivariate context. Using spatially structured latent variables to approximate residual covariance between species occurrence probabilities and sampling inclusion probabilities, we present ways to account for sampling that may be preferential to varying degrees across multiple species, where (analogously) multiple datastreams might be preferential to varying degrees for a single species, or both. We use simulation to explore our proposed model and present an application that delineates the distributions of 13 bumble bee species across Wisconsin, USA and evaluates evidence for preferential sampling within 3 citizen science datastreams.

Main Conclusions

Simulation results suggest that our proposed model improves out-of-sample predictions of species occurrence or richness when the sampling design is preferential and residual covariance between sampling and species occurrence exhibits spatial structure compatible with model assumptions, reducing bias in predictions of species occurrence or richness. Empirically, volunteers appeared to sample preferentially with respect to bumble bee distributions, being more likely to sample in locations where the federally listed Bombus affinis was more likely to occur. Our approach enables practitioners a means to triage preferential sampling within increasingly popular multi-species or integrated distribution models and can be modified slightly to deal with a variety of other response variables.

志愿者在濒危大黄蜂发生的地方取样:多物种或综合分布模型中基于模型的优先抽样分类
目的许多大规模的生态调查和监测工作在非结构化的研究设计下收集多物种(或其他多变量)数据。非结构化设计容易受到优先抽样的影响,其中抽样选择的位置和感兴趣的响应变量之间的残差协方差可能使预测产生强烈偏差。我们扩展了以前的工作,以解决空间单物种分布模型中的优先采样到多变量环境。利用空间结构化的潜在变量来近似物种发生概率和采样包含概率之间的残差协方差,我们提出了解释采样在多个物种中可能有不同程度的偏好的方法,其中(类似地)多个数据流可能对单个物种或两者都有不同程度的偏好。我们使用模拟来探索我们提出的模型,并提出了一个应用程序,该应用程序描绘了13种大黄蜂在美国威斯康星州的分布,并评估了3个公民科学数据流中优先抽样的证据。模拟结果表明,当采样设计为优先,采样与物种发生之间的残差协方差呈现与模型假设相一致的空间结构时,该模型改善了物种发生或丰富度的样本外预测,减少了物种发生或丰富度预测的偏差。根据经验,志愿者似乎优先考虑大黄蜂的分布,更有可能在联邦政府列出的亲缘大黄蜂更有可能出现的地方取样。我们的方法使从业者能够在日益流行的多物种或综合分布模型中分类优先抽样,并且可以稍微修改以处理各种其他响应变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信