Occupancy of roe deer, water deer, and wild boar in wind farm-integrated forest ecosystems: A case study in Korea

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70258
Seong-Hyeon Kim, Thakur Dhakal, Ki Hwan Cho, Tae-Su Kim, Seung-Hyeon Woo, Jun-Young Kim, Do-Hun Lee, Gab-Sue Jang
{"title":"Occupancy of roe deer, water deer, and wild boar in wind farm-integrated forest ecosystems: A case study in Korea","authors":"Seong-Hyeon Kim,&nbsp;Thakur Dhakal,&nbsp;Ki Hwan Cho,&nbsp;Tae-Su Kim,&nbsp;Seung-Hyeon Woo,&nbsp;Jun-Young Kim,&nbsp;Do-Hun Lee,&nbsp;Gab-Sue Jang","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the impact of anthropogenic structures on wildlife is essential for balancing ecosystem services. This study explored the impacts of anthropogenic disturbances, particularly wind farms, on South Korean Forest ecosystems using spatial occupancy models and camera trap survey data. We examined the occupancy probability of mammals (roe deer, water deer, and wild boar) around wind farms and identified the influencing factors. The results revealed that roe deer exhibited the highest occupancy probability (0.936), water deer exhibited the lowest (0.503), and wild boar exhibited intermediate values (0.657). For roe deer, the occupancy probability increased with distance from the wind turbine, whereas a high canopy height had a negative impact. Water deer showed a positive correlation with decreasing distance to agricultural land and increasing distance to residential land. Canopy height also contributed positively. Similarly, wild boar displayed a positive association with increased canopy height. Analyzing the impact of wind farm construction time, water deer exhibited a decrease in occupancy probability with more recent construction, whereas wild boars showed the opposite trend. The predicted occupancy probability indicated that roe deer and water deer had the lowest probability near the recently built wind farms, whereas wild boar had the highest probability. The findings of this study contribute to an ecologically informed conservation approach alongside the expansion of wind energy infrastructure. This study serves as a reference for future studies exploring the complex interactions between anthropogenic disturbances and for sustainable wildlife management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70258","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the impact of anthropogenic structures on wildlife is essential for balancing ecosystem services. This study explored the impacts of anthropogenic disturbances, particularly wind farms, on South Korean Forest ecosystems using spatial occupancy models and camera trap survey data. We examined the occupancy probability of mammals (roe deer, water deer, and wild boar) around wind farms and identified the influencing factors. The results revealed that roe deer exhibited the highest occupancy probability (0.936), water deer exhibited the lowest (0.503), and wild boar exhibited intermediate values (0.657). For roe deer, the occupancy probability increased with distance from the wind turbine, whereas a high canopy height had a negative impact. Water deer showed a positive correlation with decreasing distance to agricultural land and increasing distance to residential land. Canopy height also contributed positively. Similarly, wild boar displayed a positive association with increased canopy height. Analyzing the impact of wind farm construction time, water deer exhibited a decrease in occupancy probability with more recent construction, whereas wild boars showed the opposite trend. The predicted occupancy probability indicated that roe deer and water deer had the lowest probability near the recently built wind farms, whereas wild boar had the highest probability. The findings of this study contribute to an ecologically informed conservation approach alongside the expansion of wind energy infrastructure. This study serves as a reference for future studies exploring the complex interactions between anthropogenic disturbances and for sustainable wildlife management.

鹿群、鹿群和野猪在风电场综合森林生态系统中的占有:以韩国为例
了解人为结构对野生动物的影响对于平衡生态系统服务至关重要。本研究利用空间占用模型和相机陷阱调查数据探讨了人为干扰,特别是风电场对韩国森林生态系统的影响。研究了风电场周围哺乳动物(狍、鹿和野猪)的占用率,并确定了影响因素。结果表明,狍的占用率最高(0.936),鹿的占用率最低(0.503),野猪的占用率居中(0.657)。对于狍来说,占用率随距离风力机的远近而增加,而冠层高度越高,占用率越低。鹿群与农用地距离减小、与居民点距离增大呈显著正相关。冠层高度也有正贡献。同样,野猪也表现出与冠层高度增加呈正相关。分析了风电场建设时间的影响,随着风电场建设时间的增加,水鹿的占用率呈下降趋势,而野猪的占用率呈相反趋势。预测的占用概率表明,在新建风电场附近,狍和水鹿的占用概率最低,而野猪的占用概率最高。这项研究的结果有助于在扩大风能基础设施的同时采取生态保护方法。本研究为进一步探讨人为干扰之间的复杂相互作用和野生动物的可持续管理提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信