{"title":"Therapeutic and Prognostic Potential of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Evidence From Transcriptome Data and In Vitro Experiments","authors":"Feiyan Yang, Jianye Yang, Guobiao Yang, Ya Zhang","doi":"10.1111/crj.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of cell-surface molecules involve in various signal transduction, have recently been recognized as important drivers of cancer. However, few studies have reported on the potential of GPCRs as therapeutic targets or biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The expression profiles and clinical data of LUAD in the GSE30219 and GSE18842 datasets of the Cancer Genome Atlas were analyzed. LUAD-associated module genes were screened utilizing weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Prognostic signature genes were identified by univariate Cox survival analysis, LASSO regression, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The immune status was evaluated and drug sensitivity was determined, conducting in vitro experiments for validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with LUAD exhibited lower GPCR score than the controls, and 38 dysregulated GPCRs were identified by screening with differential analysis and WGCNA module genes. An optimal prognostic signature was identified, including OR51E1, LGR4, ADRB1, ADGRD1, and ADGRE3. The model established based on these five genes harbored moderate predictive performance for the survival of patients with LUAD. The risk score was negatively correlated with the infiltrating levels of multiple immune cells, including M2 macrophages, myeloid dendritic cells, and neutrophils, but positively correlated with fewer immune cells, such as Th1/Th2 CD4 + T cell. ADGRE3 and OR51E1 expression was positively correlated with drug sensitivity, including to cisplatin, ribociclib, and pevonedistat. Silencing OR51E1 inhibited the malignant cytological behaviors of LUAD cells.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>GPCRs demonstrated prognostic potential in LUAD, with five genes identified as potential therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers for LUAD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of cell-surface molecules involve in various signal transduction, have recently been recognized as important drivers of cancer. However, few studies have reported on the potential of GPCRs as therapeutic targets or biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
Methods
The expression profiles and clinical data of LUAD in the GSE30219 and GSE18842 datasets of the Cancer Genome Atlas were analyzed. LUAD-associated module genes were screened utilizing weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Prognostic signature genes were identified by univariate Cox survival analysis, LASSO regression, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The immune status was evaluated and drug sensitivity was determined, conducting in vitro experiments for validation.
Results
Patients with LUAD exhibited lower GPCR score than the controls, and 38 dysregulated GPCRs were identified by screening with differential analysis and WGCNA module genes. An optimal prognostic signature was identified, including OR51E1, LGR4, ADRB1, ADGRD1, and ADGRE3. The model established based on these five genes harbored moderate predictive performance for the survival of patients with LUAD. The risk score was negatively correlated with the infiltrating levels of multiple immune cells, including M2 macrophages, myeloid dendritic cells, and neutrophils, but positively correlated with fewer immune cells, such as Th1/Th2 CD4 + T cell. ADGRE3 and OR51E1 expression was positively correlated with drug sensitivity, including to cisplatin, ribociclib, and pevonedistat. Silencing OR51E1 inhibited the malignant cytological behaviors of LUAD cells.
Conclusion
GPCRs demonstrated prognostic potential in LUAD, with five genes identified as potential therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers for LUAD.
期刊介绍:
Overview
Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format.
Aims and Scope
The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic.
We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including:
Asthma
Allergy
COPD
Non-invasive ventilation
Sleep related breathing disorders
Interstitial lung diseases
Lung cancer
Clinical genetics
Rhinitis
Airway and lung infection
Epidemiology
Pediatrics
CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies.
Keywords
Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease,
Abstracting and Indexing Information
Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing)
Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing)
Embase (Elsevier)
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell)
Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics)
MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
ProQuest Central (ProQuest)
Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics)
SCOPUS (Elsevier)