Random forest regression to predict Farinograph traits from GlutoPeak output in wheat wild relative backcross lines

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
John H. Price, Mary J. Guttieri, Sydney Stutz
{"title":"Random forest regression to predict Farinograph traits from GlutoPeak output in wheat wild relative backcross lines","authors":"John H. Price,&nbsp;Mary J. Guttieri,&nbsp;Sydney Stutz","doi":"10.1002/cche.10860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Flour quality is a key target of hard winter wheat breeding. The Farinograph is important for assessing quality before cultivar release in the United States, but large sample size requirements and long test times render it impractical for early-stage selection relative to the GlutoPeak. To improve GlutoPeak utility for breeding, we calculated new parameters from device raw output and used random forest regression to predict key Farinograph parameters in a winter wheat population containing wild relative introgressions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The key quality parameters of absorption, bake absorption, tolerance stability, and mixing tolerance index were moderately well predicted (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.488 to 0.745). Classification of samples as acceptable or unacceptable for mixing tolerance index and tolerance stability was more accurate than prediction of numeric values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>New features calculated from the GlutoPeak raw data were useful predictors of quality. Prediction accuracies are sufficient to improve breeding populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance and Novelty</h3>\n \n <p>This study is the first to use wheat wild relative introgressions in GlutoPeak Farinograph prediction, the first to generate features from raw data, and is one of the few random forest models for quality prediction. The tools that we provide will improve ability to cull poor-quality lines early in the breeding pipeline can support efficient wheat cultivar development.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9807,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Chemistry","volume":"102 3","pages":"466-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cche.10860","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cche.10860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Flour quality is a key target of hard winter wheat breeding. The Farinograph is important for assessing quality before cultivar release in the United States, but large sample size requirements and long test times render it impractical for early-stage selection relative to the GlutoPeak. To improve GlutoPeak utility for breeding, we calculated new parameters from device raw output and used random forest regression to predict key Farinograph parameters in a winter wheat population containing wild relative introgressions.

Findings

The key quality parameters of absorption, bake absorption, tolerance stability, and mixing tolerance index were moderately well predicted (R2 ranging from 0.488 to 0.745). Classification of samples as acceptable or unacceptable for mixing tolerance index and tolerance stability was more accurate than prediction of numeric values.

Conclusions

New features calculated from the GlutoPeak raw data were useful predictors of quality. Prediction accuracies are sufficient to improve breeding populations.

Significance and Novelty

This study is the first to use wheat wild relative introgressions in GlutoPeak Farinograph prediction, the first to generate features from raw data, and is one of the few random forest models for quality prediction. The tools that we provide will improve ability to cull poor-quality lines early in the breeding pipeline can support efficient wheat cultivar development.

随机森林回归预测小麦野生相对回交系glutoppeak产量的粒度性状
背景与目的面粉品质是硬冬小麦育种的关键指标。在美国,Farinograph对于品种发布前的质量评估是很重要的,但是相对于GlutoPeak,大样本量要求和长测试时间使得它在早期选择中不切实际。为了提高GlutoPeak对育种的效用,我们从设备的原始输出中计算新的参数,并使用随机森林回归预测含有野生相对基因渗入的冬小麦群体的关键Farinograph参数。结果吸光度、烘培吸光度、耐受性稳定性、混合耐受性指标等关键质量参数预测效果较好(R2为0.488 ~ 0.745)。混合公差指数和公差稳定性的可接受或不可接受分类比数值预测更准确。结论从GlutoPeak原始数据计算出的新特征是有效的质量预测指标。预测的准确性足以提高繁殖种群。本研究首次在GlutoPeak Farinograph预测中使用小麦野生相对渗入,首次从原始数据中生成特征,是为数不多的用于质量预测的随机森林模型之一。我们提供的工具将提高在育种管道中早期剔除劣质品系的能力,从而支持高效的小麦品种开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cereal Chemistry
Cereal Chemistry 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
110
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cereal Chemistry publishes high-quality papers reporting novel research and significant conceptual advances in genetics, biotechnology, composition, processing, and utili­zation of cereal grains (barley, maize, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, triticale, and wheat), pulses (beans, lentils, peas, etc.), oil­seeds, and specialty crops (amaranth, flax, quinoa, etc.). Papers advancing grain science in relation to health, nutrition, pet and animal food, and safety, along with new methodologies, instrumentation, and analysis relating to these areas are welcome, as are research notes and topical review papers. The journal generally does not accept papers that focus on nongrain ingredients, technology of a commercial or proprietary nature, or that confirm previous research without extending knowledge. Papers that describe product development should include discussion of underlying theoretical principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信