{"title":"Impact of “coal to electricity” policy on air quality during heating period over Beijing − Tianjin − Hebei region in China by WRF-Chem model","authors":"Ruting Zhang, Chuanmin Chen, Songtao Liu, Huacheng Wu, Weiqing Zhou, Peng Li","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01685-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the pursuit of enhancing the atmospheric environment quality, the Chinese government has promulgated directives advocating for alternative energy sources and has implemented a suite of regulatory measures, including the “coal to electricity” policy. However, the precise quantification of the policy's impact on air quality remains a challenge. This study employs simulation experiments, comparing a basic scenario with an emissions reduction scenario, to assess the policy's efficacy. The findings indicate that the policy has led to a reduction in the daily average concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing, Tianjin, Baoding, and Shijiazhuang during the heating period, with decreases ranging from 0.2 − 5.6 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, corresponding to a reduction of 1 − 6%. Notably, during the severe pollution episode on December 15, 2018, the hourly average concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the majority of the Beijing − Tianjin − Hebei (BTH) region experienced a decrease between 1.02 − 7.53 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. Furthermore, the study observed a reduction in the average concentrations of other pollutants across the BTH region in December 2018. Specifically, the reductions in PM<sub>10</sub>, CO, SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were within the ranges of 0.42 − 11.47 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.01 − 0.77 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.39 − 24.18 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, and 0.76 − 2.91 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Although the “coal to electricity” policy has only partially replaced residential emission sources, it has demonstrated a significant role in improving air quality within the BTH region. It is recommended that future policy development and refinement be tailored to the specific conditions, with a focus on further advancing energy transformation, such as the substitution of coal, to achieve more comprehensive environmental benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 4","pages":"995 - 1008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01685-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the pursuit of enhancing the atmospheric environment quality, the Chinese government has promulgated directives advocating for alternative energy sources and has implemented a suite of regulatory measures, including the “coal to electricity” policy. However, the precise quantification of the policy's impact on air quality remains a challenge. This study employs simulation experiments, comparing a basic scenario with an emissions reduction scenario, to assess the policy's efficacy. The findings indicate that the policy has led to a reduction in the daily average concentration of PM2.5 in Beijing, Tianjin, Baoding, and Shijiazhuang during the heating period, with decreases ranging from 0.2 − 5.6 μg/m3, corresponding to a reduction of 1 − 6%. Notably, during the severe pollution episode on December 15, 2018, the hourly average concentration of PM2.5 in the majority of the Beijing − Tianjin − Hebei (BTH) region experienced a decrease between 1.02 − 7.53 μg/m3. Furthermore, the study observed a reduction in the average concentrations of other pollutants across the BTH region in December 2018. Specifically, the reductions in PM10, CO, SO2 and NO2 concentrations were within the ranges of 0.42 − 11.47 μg/m3, 0.01 − 0.77 μg/m3, 0.39 − 24.18 μg/m3, and 0.76 − 2.91 μg/m3, respectively. Although the “coal to electricity” policy has only partially replaced residential emission sources, it has demonstrated a significant role in improving air quality within the BTH region. It is recommended that future policy development and refinement be tailored to the specific conditions, with a focus on further advancing energy transformation, such as the substitution of coal, to achieve more comprehensive environmental benefits.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.