Impact of “coal to electricity” policy on air quality during heating period over Beijing − Tianjin − Hebei region in China by WRF-Chem model

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ruting Zhang, Chuanmin Chen, Songtao Liu, Huacheng Wu, Weiqing Zhou, Peng Li
{"title":"Impact of “coal to electricity” policy on air quality during heating period over Beijing − Tianjin − Hebei region in China by WRF-Chem model","authors":"Ruting Zhang,&nbsp;Chuanmin Chen,&nbsp;Songtao Liu,&nbsp;Huacheng Wu,&nbsp;Weiqing Zhou,&nbsp;Peng Li","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01685-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the pursuit of enhancing the atmospheric environment quality, the Chinese government has promulgated directives advocating for alternative energy sources and has implemented a suite of regulatory measures, including the “coal to electricity” policy. However, the precise quantification of the policy's impact on air quality remains a challenge. This study employs simulation experiments, comparing a basic scenario with an emissions reduction scenario, to assess the policy's efficacy. The findings indicate that the policy has led to a reduction in the daily average concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing, Tianjin, Baoding, and Shijiazhuang during the heating period, with decreases ranging from 0.2 − 5.6 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, corresponding to a reduction of 1 − 6%. Notably, during the severe pollution episode on December 15, 2018, the hourly average concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the majority of the Beijing − Tianjin − Hebei (BTH) region experienced a decrease between 1.02 − 7.53 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. Furthermore, the study observed a reduction in the average concentrations of other pollutants across the BTH region in December 2018. Specifically, the reductions in PM<sub>10</sub>, CO, SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were within the ranges of 0.42 − 11.47 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.01 − 0.77 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.39 − 24.18 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, and 0.76 − 2.91 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Although the “coal to electricity” policy has only partially replaced residential emission sources, it has demonstrated a significant role in improving air quality within the BTH region. It is recommended that future policy development and refinement be tailored to the specific conditions, with a focus on further advancing energy transformation, such as the substitution of coal, to achieve more comprehensive environmental benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 4","pages":"995 - 1008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01685-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the pursuit of enhancing the atmospheric environment quality, the Chinese government has promulgated directives advocating for alternative energy sources and has implemented a suite of regulatory measures, including the “coal to electricity” policy. However, the precise quantification of the policy's impact on air quality remains a challenge. This study employs simulation experiments, comparing a basic scenario with an emissions reduction scenario, to assess the policy's efficacy. The findings indicate that the policy has led to a reduction in the daily average concentration of PM2.5 in Beijing, Tianjin, Baoding, and Shijiazhuang during the heating period, with decreases ranging from 0.2 − 5.6 μg/m3, corresponding to a reduction of 1 − 6%. Notably, during the severe pollution episode on December 15, 2018, the hourly average concentration of PM2.5 in the majority of the Beijing − Tianjin − Hebei (BTH) region experienced a decrease between 1.02 − 7.53 μg/m3. Furthermore, the study observed a reduction in the average concentrations of other pollutants across the BTH region in December 2018. Specifically, the reductions in PM10, CO, SO2 and NO2 concentrations were within the ranges of 0.42 − 11.47 μg/m3, 0.01 − 0.77 μg/m3, 0.39 − 24.18 μg/m3, and 0.76 − 2.91 μg/m3, respectively. Although the “coal to electricity” policy has only partially replaced residential emission sources, it has demonstrated a significant role in improving air quality within the BTH region. It is recommended that future policy development and refinement be tailored to the specific conditions, with a focus on further advancing energy transformation, such as the substitution of coal, to achieve more comprehensive environmental benefits.

基于WRF-Chem模型的“煤改电”政策对京津冀地区采暖期空气质量的影响
为了改善大气环境质量,中国政府颁布了倡导替代能源的指令,并实施了一系列监管措施,包括“煤改电”政策。然而,准确量化该政策对空气质量的影响仍然是一个挑战。本研究采用模拟实验,将基本情景与减排情景进行比较,以评估政策的有效性。研究结果表明,该政策导致北京、天津、保定和石家庄在采暖期间PM2.5的日平均浓度下降,下降幅度为0.2 ~ 5.6 μg/m3,相当于减少了1 ~ 6%。值得注意的是,在2018年12月15日的严重污染事件中,京津冀大部分地区的PM2.5小时平均浓度在1.02 - 7.53 μg/m3之间下降。此外,该研究还观察到,2018年12月,BTH地区其他污染物的平均浓度有所下降。其中,PM10、CO、SO2和NO2浓度下降幅度分别为0.42 ~ 11.47、0.01 ~ 0.77、0.39 ~ 24.18和0.76 ~ 2.91 μg/m3。虽然“煤改电”政策只是部分取代了居民的排放源,但它在改善北京地区的空气质量方面发挥了重要作用。建议今后的政策制定和完善应因地制宜,重点进一步推进煤炭替代等能源转型,实现更全面的环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信