Reply to the ‘Comment on the “Reaction intermediates recognized by in situ FTIR spectroscopy in CO2 hydrogenation over the Cu/ZnO/SPP-zeolite catalyst”’ by Comment author F. C. Meunier, RSC Appl. Interfaces, 2025, 2, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5LF00014A
Xiaobo Yang, Xiaolong Liu, Guangying Fu, Qiaolin Lang, Ruiqin Ding, Qiangsheng Guo, Ke Liang, Shuman Gao and Bing Yu
{"title":"Reply to the ‘Comment on the “Reaction intermediates recognized by in situ FTIR spectroscopy in CO2 hydrogenation over the Cu/ZnO/SPP-zeolite catalyst”’ by Comment author F. C. Meunier, RSC Appl. Interfaces, 2025, 2, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5LF00014A","authors":"Xiaobo Yang, Xiaolong Liu, Guangying Fu, Qiaolin Lang, Ruiqin Ding, Qiangsheng Guo, Ke Liang, Shuman Gao and Bing Yu","doi":"10.1039/D5LF00065C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We agree with Professor Meunier's comment that the two IR peaks at 2075 and 2060 cm<small><sup>−1</sup></small> belong to CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> in the cell in the gas phase, and not to Cu–C<img>O. We sincerely appreciate his insightful correction. The correction and conclusion related to the original paper are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101138,"journal":{"name":"RSC Applied Interfaces","volume":" 3","pages":" 839-839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/lf/d5lf00065c?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Applied Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/lf/d5lf00065c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We agree with Professor Meunier's comment that the two IR peaks at 2075 and 2060 cm−1 belong to CO2 in the cell in the gas phase, and not to Cu–CO. We sincerely appreciate his insightful correction. The correction and conclusion related to the original paper are discussed.