What drives urban land green use efficiency in China: A global meta-frontier Malmquist Index approach

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yufeng Chen , Hao Ge , Minghui Chen
{"title":"What drives urban land green use efficiency in China: A global meta-frontier Malmquist Index approach","authors":"Yufeng Chen ,&nbsp;Hao Ge ,&nbsp;Minghui Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization has brought substantial socio-economic benefits to China, as well as numerous problems related to resources and the environment. The efficient and green use of urban land is an urgent task for China’s future sustainable development and green urbanization under the new conditions of high-quality economic development. This paper comprehensively measures urban land green use efficiency by combining the SBM-undesirable and <em>meta</em>-frontier models. It examines the technical heterogeneity in different regions and the causes of urban land green use inefficiency. Subsequently, this paper decomposes the dynamics of urban land green use efficiency and explores its driving factors using the Malmquist Index. Finally, this paper analyzes the factors that influence urban land green use efficiency by using the Tobit model. In this paper, it was found that (1) China’s urban land green use efficiency remains inefficient, and there was a gap between the production technology and the potential optimal production technology in each region. (2) In terms of urban land green use efficiency, there is a significant degree of technological heterogeneity, but most regions are slowly catching up with potential production technologies. (3) Urban land green use inefficiency mainly stems from production technology and management inefficiency, and each region has different technological and management potentials in land use. (4) Economic growth contributes significantly to urban land green use efficiency in all regions, while financial pressures have the opposite effect. The impacts of other influences on urban land green use efficiency varied by region. Based on the empirical findings, the government should critically review available land and consider land use holistically. Meanwhile, land use techniques should be continuously improved, and land planning concepts should be updated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113550"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has brought substantial socio-economic benefits to China, as well as numerous problems related to resources and the environment. The efficient and green use of urban land is an urgent task for China’s future sustainable development and green urbanization under the new conditions of high-quality economic development. This paper comprehensively measures urban land green use efficiency by combining the SBM-undesirable and meta-frontier models. It examines the technical heterogeneity in different regions and the causes of urban land green use inefficiency. Subsequently, this paper decomposes the dynamics of urban land green use efficiency and explores its driving factors using the Malmquist Index. Finally, this paper analyzes the factors that influence urban land green use efficiency by using the Tobit model. In this paper, it was found that (1) China’s urban land green use efficiency remains inefficient, and there was a gap between the production technology and the potential optimal production technology in each region. (2) In terms of urban land green use efficiency, there is a significant degree of technological heterogeneity, but most regions are slowly catching up with potential production technologies. (3) Urban land green use inefficiency mainly stems from production technology and management inefficiency, and each region has different technological and management potentials in land use. (4) Economic growth contributes significantly to urban land green use efficiency in all regions, while financial pressures have the opposite effect. The impacts of other influences on urban land green use efficiency varied by region. Based on the empirical findings, the government should critically review available land and consider land use holistically. Meanwhile, land use techniques should be continuously improved, and land planning concepts should be updated.
中国城市土地绿色利用效率的驱动因素:全球元前沿Malmquist指数方法
快速的城市化给中国带来了巨大的社会经济效益,同时也带来了许多资源和环境问题。在经济高质量发展的新条件下,城市土地的高效绿色利用是中国未来可持续发展和绿色城镇化的紧迫任务。本文结合sbm - desired模型和meta-frontier模型对城市土地绿色利用效率进行了综合测度。分析了城市土地绿色利用效率低下的区域技术异质性和原因。随后,利用马尔姆奎斯特指数对城市土地绿色利用效率动态进行分解,并探讨其驱动因素。最后,利用Tobit模型分析了城市土地绿色利用效率的影响因素。研究发现:(1)中国城市土地绿色利用效率仍然不高,各区域的生产技术与潜在最优生产技术之间存在差距。(2)城市土地绿色利用效率存在显著的技术异质性,但大部分地区对潜在生产技术的追赶速度较慢。(3)城市土地绿色利用效率低下主要源于生产技术和管理效率低下,各区域土地利用技术和管理潜力不同。(4)各区域经济增长对城市土地绿色利用效率的贡献显著,而金融压力对城市土地绿色利用效率的影响相反。其他影响因素对城市土地绿色利用效率的影响因区域而异。基于实证研究结果,政府应严格审查可用土地,并从整体上考虑土地利用。同时,不断提高土地利用技术,更新土地规划理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信