Optimization and comparison of multi-beds PSA technology for separation of carbon dioxide mixtures by processes simulations

Qiwei Yang , Jingjing Chai , Li Yang, Zhen Chen, Yuanhang Qin, Tielin Wang, Wei Sun, Cunwen Wang
{"title":"Optimization and comparison of multi-beds PSA technology for separation of carbon dioxide mixtures by processes simulations","authors":"Qiwei Yang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Chai ,&nbsp;Li Yang,&nbsp;Zhen Chen,&nbsp;Yuanhang Qin,&nbsp;Tielin Wang,&nbsp;Wei Sun,&nbsp;Cunwen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.clce.2025.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) demonstrates significant potential for post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture from coal-fired flue gas (15 % CO<sub>2</sub>/85 % N<sub>2</sub>). This study systematically investigates two-bed, four-bed, and six-bed structural configurations of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) systems to elucidate the purity-recovery trade-off relationship. The six-bed process, incorporating triple pressure equalization steps, achieves the breakthrough performance of 92.7 % CO<sub>2</sub> purity and 92.4 % recovery under industrially feasible conditions (10 bar adsorption pressure, 40 s cycle time), surpassing conventional two-bed systems where neither metric exceeds 90 %. While the four-bed configuration attains ultra-high purity (∼99 % CO<sub>2</sub>), its scalability in recovery remains constrained. Rigorous optimization of operational parameters (adsorption pressure, cycle time, bed aspect ratio) balances energy efficiency and separation performance. Results highlight multi-bed PSA, particularly the six-bed system, as a scalable solution for industrial CO<sub>2</sub> capture, effectively bridging the gap between high-purity benchmarks and practical recovery targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100251,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277278232500035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) demonstrates significant potential for post-combustion CO2 capture from coal-fired flue gas (15 % CO2/85 % N2). This study systematically investigates two-bed, four-bed, and six-bed structural configurations of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) systems to elucidate the purity-recovery trade-off relationship. The six-bed process, incorporating triple pressure equalization steps, achieves the breakthrough performance of 92.7 % CO2 purity and 92.4 % recovery under industrially feasible conditions (10 bar adsorption pressure, 40 s cycle time), surpassing conventional two-bed systems where neither metric exceeds 90 %. While the four-bed configuration attains ultra-high purity (∼99 % CO2), its scalability in recovery remains constrained. Rigorous optimization of operational parameters (adsorption pressure, cycle time, bed aspect ratio) balances energy efficiency and separation performance. Results highlight multi-bed PSA, particularly the six-bed system, as a scalable solution for industrial CO2 capture, effectively bridging the gap between high-purity benchmarks and practical recovery targets.

Abstract Image

通过过程模拟对二氧化碳混合物多层PSA分离技术的优化与比较
变压吸附(PSA)显示了从燃煤烟气(15% CO2/ 85% N2)中捕获燃烧后二氧化碳的巨大潜力。本研究系统地研究了两床、四床和六床变压吸附(PSA)系统的结构配置,以阐明纯度-回收率的权衡关系。在工业可行的条件下(10 bar吸附压力,40 s循环时间),采用三个压力均衡步骤的六床工艺实现了92.7%的二氧化碳纯度和92.4%的回收率的突破性性能,超过了传统的两床系统,两者的指标都不超过90%。虽然四层结构可以获得超高纯度(~ 99% CO2),但其可扩展性仍然受到限制。严格优化的操作参数(吸附压力,循环时间,床长比)平衡能源效率和分离性能。结果表明,多床PSA,特别是六床系统,作为一种可扩展的工业二氧化碳捕集解决方案,有效地弥合了高纯度基准和实际回收目标之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信