Claire Kim , Sierra N. Smith , Siddharth S. Gopalan , Samuel R. Kerwin , Kaas Ballard , Blair W. Perry , Cara F. Smith , Anthony J. Saviola , Richard H. Adams , Stephen P. Mackessy , Todd A. Castoe
{"title":"Unique physiological and regulatory activity drives divergent toxin and non-toxin gene expression in rattlesnake accessory venom glands","authors":"Claire Kim , Sierra N. Smith , Siddharth S. Gopalan , Samuel R. Kerwin , Kaas Ballard , Blair W. Perry , Cara F. Smith , Anthony J. Saviola , Richard H. Adams , Stephen P. Mackessy , Todd A. Castoe","doi":"10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the mechanisms by which organs and tissues evolve new physiological functions is central to understanding the evolution of novelty. This is particularly interesting in the context of related tissues that evolve specialized, yet complementary, functions. Snake venom glands are an attractive system to test hypotheses related to the evolution and specialization of novel physiological function, as these modified salivary glands have evolved over ∼60 MY to synthesize and store venom. Front-fanged venomous snakes (elapids and viperids) possess two types of venom glands: the main and accessory glands. The larger main gland produces greater quantities of venom toxins and has been studied extensively, while the smaller accessory gland has received less attention. Here, we explore gene expression differences between main and accessory venom glands across three rattlesnake species (<em>Crotalus cerberus</em>, <em>C. oreganus concolor</em> and <em>C. viridis</em>). Our findings indicate that accessory glands express most venom genes at significantly lower levels than the main gland, with a few exceptions that may represent biologically relevant contributions of accessory glands to venom. The two glands also exhibit distinct trans-regulatory environments that we link to key differences in their underlying physiology and secretory roles. Our results further suggest that two signaling pathways that regulate venom, the unfolded protein response (UPR) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), show significantly lower activation in the accessory gland. These findings provide insight into the physiological and functional diversification of snake venom systems, highlighting how distinct glandular systems have evolved contrasting and complementary roles driven by distinct physiological and regulatory mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23289,"journal":{"name":"Toxicon","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 108376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041010125001503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms by which organs and tissues evolve new physiological functions is central to understanding the evolution of novelty. This is particularly interesting in the context of related tissues that evolve specialized, yet complementary, functions. Snake venom glands are an attractive system to test hypotheses related to the evolution and specialization of novel physiological function, as these modified salivary glands have evolved over ∼60 MY to synthesize and store venom. Front-fanged venomous snakes (elapids and viperids) possess two types of venom glands: the main and accessory glands. The larger main gland produces greater quantities of venom toxins and has been studied extensively, while the smaller accessory gland has received less attention. Here, we explore gene expression differences between main and accessory venom glands across three rattlesnake species (Crotalus cerberus, C. oreganus concolor and C. viridis). Our findings indicate that accessory glands express most venom genes at significantly lower levels than the main gland, with a few exceptions that may represent biologically relevant contributions of accessory glands to venom. The two glands also exhibit distinct trans-regulatory environments that we link to key differences in their underlying physiology and secretory roles. Our results further suggest that two signaling pathways that regulate venom, the unfolded protein response (UPR) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), show significantly lower activation in the accessory gland. These findings provide insight into the physiological and functional diversification of snake venom systems, highlighting how distinct glandular systems have evolved contrasting and complementary roles driven by distinct physiological and regulatory mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Toxicon has an open access mirror Toxicon: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. An introductory offer Toxicon: X - full waiver of the Open Access fee.
Toxicon''s "aims and scope" are to publish:
-articles containing the results of original research on problems related to toxins derived from animals, plants and microorganisms
-papers on novel findings related to the chemical, pharmacological, toxicological, and immunological properties of natural toxins
-molecular biological studies of toxins and other genes from poisonous and venomous organisms that advance understanding of the role or function of toxins
-clinical observations on poisoning and envenoming where a new therapeutic principle has been proposed or a decidedly superior clinical result has been obtained.
-material on the use of toxins as tools in studying biological processes and material on subjects related to venom and antivenom problems.
-articles on the translational application of toxins, for example as drugs and insecticides
-epidemiological studies on envenoming or poisoning, so long as they highlight a previously unrecognised medical problem or provide insight into the prevention or medical treatment of envenoming or poisoning. Retrospective surveys of hospital records, especially those lacking species identification, will not be considered for publication. Properly designed prospective community-based surveys are strongly encouraged.
-articles describing well-known activities of venoms, such as antibacterial, anticancer, and analgesic activities of arachnid venoms, without any attempt to define the mechanism of action or purify the active component, will not be considered for publication in Toxicon.
-review articles on problems related to toxinology.
To encourage the exchange of ideas, sections of the journal may be devoted to Short Communications, Letters to the Editor and activities of the affiliated societies.