Impact of rescuer position, arm angle, and anthropometric variables on muscle fatigue during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an international multicentric randomized crossover simulation study

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Carla Sa-Couto , Pedro Sa-Couto , Abel Nicolau , Marc Lazarovici , Christoffer Ericsson , Pedro Vieira-Marques , Ingrid Bispo
{"title":"Impact of rescuer position, arm angle, and anthropometric variables on muscle fatigue during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an international multicentric randomized crossover simulation study","authors":"Carla Sa-Couto ,&nbsp;Pedro Sa-Couto ,&nbsp;Abel Nicolau ,&nbsp;Marc Lazarovici ,&nbsp;Christoffer Ericsson ,&nbsp;Pedro Vieira-Marques ,&nbsp;Ingrid Bispo","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a lack of studies using surface electromyography (sEMG) to objectively assess the impact of rescuer position and arm angle on muscle fatigue during CPR. Additionally, the relationship between anthropometric variables (height and weight) and muscle fatigue remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to objectively assess muscle fatigue during CPR by analyzing <em>triceps brachii</em> sEMG activation during continuous chest compressions (CCs) across different rescuer positions and arm angles. A secondary objective is to examine correlations between anthropometric variables and muscle fatigue, while also evaluating the impact of CCs quality on fatigue levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This international, multicentric, randomized crossover simulation trial included healthcare professionals assigned to one of four rescuer positions: kneeling on the floor, standing, standing on a step stool, and kneeling on a bed. Participants performed two 3-minute trials of continuous CCs at 90° and 105° arm angles. Muscle fatigue was assessed via sEMG, while compression quality was evaluated using manikin-derived data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 72 participants were included. The 105° arm angle significantly increased muscle fatigue compared to 90° (p &lt; 0.001) across all rescuer positions. Taller and heavier rescuers exhibited lower fatigue for both arm angles (p &lt; 0.05); however, fatigue levels were consistently higher at 105° than at 90°.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Arm angle is a key determinant of rescuer muscle fatigue, with 105° increasing fatigue compared to 90°. Rescuer position alone was not significant, though fatigue was more pronounced in kneeling and elevated positions. Taller and heavier rescuers demonstrated greater endurance but remained affected by suboptimal arm angles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a lack of studies using surface electromyography (sEMG) to objectively assess the impact of rescuer position and arm angle on muscle fatigue during CPR. Additionally, the relationship between anthropometric variables (height and weight) and muscle fatigue remains underexplored.

Aim

This study aims to objectively assess muscle fatigue during CPR by analyzing triceps brachii sEMG activation during continuous chest compressions (CCs) across different rescuer positions and arm angles. A secondary objective is to examine correlations between anthropometric variables and muscle fatigue, while also evaluating the impact of CCs quality on fatigue levels.

Methods

This international, multicentric, randomized crossover simulation trial included healthcare professionals assigned to one of four rescuer positions: kneeling on the floor, standing, standing on a step stool, and kneeling on a bed. Participants performed two 3-minute trials of continuous CCs at 90° and 105° arm angles. Muscle fatigue was assessed via sEMG, while compression quality was evaluated using manikin-derived data.

Results

A total of 72 participants were included. The 105° arm angle significantly increased muscle fatigue compared to 90° (p < 0.001) across all rescuer positions. Taller and heavier rescuers exhibited lower fatigue for both arm angles (p < 0.05); however, fatigue levels were consistently higher at 105° than at 90°.

Conclusion

Arm angle is a key determinant of rescuer muscle fatigue, with 105° increasing fatigue compared to 90°. Rescuer position alone was not significant, though fatigue was more pronounced in kneeling and elevated positions. Taller and heavier rescuers demonstrated greater endurance but remained affected by suboptimal arm angles.
心肺复苏过程中施救者体位、手臂角度和人体测量变量对肌肉疲劳的影响:一项国际多中心随机交叉模拟研究
在心肺复苏术中,缺乏使用表面肌电图(sEMG)客观评估施救者体位和手臂角度对肌肉疲劳影响的研究。此外,人体测量变量(身高和体重)与肌肉疲劳之间的关系仍未得到充分探讨。目的本研究旨在通过分析连续胸按压(CCs)过程中不同施救者体位和手臂角度下肱三头肌肌电信号的激活情况,客观评估心肺复苏过程中的肌肉疲劳。第二个目标是检查人体测量变量与肌肉疲劳之间的相关性,同时也评估CCs质量对疲劳水平的影响。方法:这项国际、多中心、随机交叉模拟试验包括医疗保健专业人员,他们被分配到四种救援姿势中的一种:跪在地板上、站立、站在台阶凳上和跪在床上。参与者在90°和105°臂角进行了两次3分钟的连续CCs试验。肌肉疲劳通过肌电图进行评估,压缩质量通过人体模型数据进行评估。结果共纳入受试者72例。与90°臂角相比,105°臂角明显增加肌肉疲劳。0.001)。较高和较重的救援者在两臂角度均表现出较低的疲劳(p <;0.05);然而,105°时的疲劳程度始终高于90°时。结论手臂角度是决定救援者肌肉疲劳程度的关键因素,手臂角度为105°时比90°时疲劳程度加重。单独的救援体位并不显著,但跪姿和抬高体位的疲劳更为明显。更高和更重的救援人员表现出更强的耐力,但仍然受到次优手臂角度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信