Current practice in pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a national survey among Italian pediatric intensivists

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Giovanni Babini , Alberto Cucino , Giuseppe Stirparo , Giuseppe Ristagno , Carlo Agostoni , Mirjana Cvetkovic , Italian Network of PICU Study Group (TIPNet)
{"title":"Current practice in pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a national survey among Italian pediatric intensivists","authors":"Giovanni Babini ,&nbsp;Alberto Cucino ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Stirparo ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Ristagno ,&nbsp;Carlo Agostoni ,&nbsp;Mirjana Cvetkovic ,&nbsp;Italian Network of PICU Study Group (TIPNet)","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care (PCAC) is an evolving science with many uncertainties leading to many variations in practice. This study aimed to investigate the current practice in PCAC care across Italian paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), interviewing a cohort of pediatric intensivists.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An electronic survey with 69 questions was distributed to 54 physicians from 23 PICUs in Italy. The survey covered various domains of PCAC care, including hemodynamics, oxygenation and ventilation, sedation, seizure and temperature control, infection treatment, glycemic control, transfusion practice, neuroprognostication, post-CA recovery and rehabilitation, organisation and local protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-eight out of 54 invited physicians (51%) completed the survey, accounting for 82% of the participating PICUs. Up to 80% reported no specific PCAC protocol in their PICU. Half of the respondents suggested specific recommendations for patients of lower ages, particularly infants. Significant variability was observed in hemodynamic monitoring and support; 45% did not have a specific hemodynamic target, while 41% aimed for a systolic arterial pressure above the 50th age-specific percentile. Seventy-one percent lacked a protocol for target temperature management (TTM), with significant variability in practice. Sixty-four percent did not have a scheduled follow-up program for survivors after hospital discharge. A rehabilitation program for survivors and psychological support for patients and their families were available in half of the instances. Neuroprotective strategies, prognostication, and hemodynamic management were the top PCAC research priorities reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study revealed significant variability in PCAC care practices among pediatric intensivists. The majority of surveyed practitioners evidenced the limits of current PCAC evidence, potentially advocating the need for further research. The top three areas recognised as PCAC research priorities include hemodynamic optimisation, neuroprotective therapies and neuroprognostication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care (PCAC) is an evolving science with many uncertainties leading to many variations in practice. This study aimed to investigate the current practice in PCAC care across Italian paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), interviewing a cohort of pediatric intensivists.

Methods

An electronic survey with 69 questions was distributed to 54 physicians from 23 PICUs in Italy. The survey covered various domains of PCAC care, including hemodynamics, oxygenation and ventilation, sedation, seizure and temperature control, infection treatment, glycemic control, transfusion practice, neuroprognostication, post-CA recovery and rehabilitation, organisation and local protocols.

Results

Twenty-eight out of 54 invited physicians (51%) completed the survey, accounting for 82% of the participating PICUs. Up to 80% reported no specific PCAC protocol in their PICU. Half of the respondents suggested specific recommendations for patients of lower ages, particularly infants. Significant variability was observed in hemodynamic monitoring and support; 45% did not have a specific hemodynamic target, while 41% aimed for a systolic arterial pressure above the 50th age-specific percentile. Seventy-one percent lacked a protocol for target temperature management (TTM), with significant variability in practice. Sixty-four percent did not have a scheduled follow-up program for survivors after hospital discharge. A rehabilitation program for survivors and psychological support for patients and their families were available in half of the instances. Neuroprotective strategies, prognostication, and hemodynamic management were the top PCAC research priorities reported.

Conclusion

The study revealed significant variability in PCAC care practices among pediatric intensivists. The majority of surveyed practitioners evidenced the limits of current PCAC evidence, potentially advocating the need for further research. The top three areas recognised as PCAC research priorities include hemodynamic optimisation, neuroprotective therapies and neuroprognostication.
儿科心脏骤停后护理的当前实践:意大利儿科重症医师的全国调查
背景和目的儿科心脏骤停后护理(PCAC)是一门不断发展的科学,在实践中存在许多不确定性导致许多变化。本研究旨在调查目前意大利儿科重症监护病房(picu)的PCAC护理实践,采访了一组儿科重症医师。方法对意大利23家picu的54名医生进行电子问卷调查,共69个问题。调查涵盖了PCAC护理的各个领域,包括血液动力学、氧合和通气、镇静、癫痫发作和温度控制、感染治疗、血糖控制、输血实践、神经预后、ca后恢复和康复、组织和当地协议。结果54名受邀医师中有28人(51%)完成了调查,占参与picu的82%。高达80%的患者报告其PICU中没有特定的PCAC方案。一半的受访者对年龄较低的患者,特别是婴儿提出了具体建议。血流动力学监测和支持方面存在显著差异;45%的人没有特定的血流动力学目标,而41%的人的目标是收缩压高于50个年龄特定百分位数。71%的人缺乏目标温度管理(TTM)协议,在实践中存在显著差异。64%的幸存者在出院后没有安排随访计划。在一半的案例中,为幸存者提供了康复计划,并为患者及其家属提供了心理支持。神经保护策略、预后和血流动力学管理是PCAC研究的重点。结论:本研究揭示了儿科重症医师在PCAC护理实践中的显著差异。大多数被调查的从业者证明了目前PCAC证据的局限性,潜在地提倡进一步研究的必要性。被认为是PCAC研究重点的三大领域包括血流动力学优化、神经保护疗法和神经预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信