Numerical modeling of solid particles reduction in water clarifiers using Lattice Boltzmann method

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Jaiuan , Y. Khunatorn
{"title":"Numerical modeling of solid particles reduction in water clarifiers using Lattice Boltzmann method","authors":"E. Jaiuan ,&nbsp;Y. Khunatorn","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Suspended solids in water are detrimental to power plant production. Statistical data from the field turbidity monitoring states different solid particle reduction performance between two existing solid contact clarifiers. This study compares their turbidity reduction efficiencies and discusses treatment characteristics of these clarifiers. The clarifiers feature circular basins with a dual layer of baffles and different internal mixing agitation. The first clarifier (<em>CLR47</em>) has the inner baffle as a truncated polygon with a lateral inlet. The second clarifier (<em>CLR89</em>) has a 30-degree tangential inlet attached to a small circular inner baffle. The Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) computational method was employed for fluid flow computation. Particles with 13 different diameter sizes ranged from 20 μm to 850 μm were accounted for suspended solid modeling via discrete phase model (DPM). The numerical model presents the overall solid settling efficiency as 46 % and 78 % for <em>CLR47</em> and <em>CLR89</em> respectively. The low recirculation within the mixing region and effluent high contamination of 20 μm size class particles of design <em>CLR89</em> were noticed. While the <em>CLR47</em> model has greater turbidity reduction despite greater maintain mixing efficiency for a higher flocculation rate expectation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"127 ","pages":"Pages 251-264"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825006222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suspended solids in water are detrimental to power plant production. Statistical data from the field turbidity monitoring states different solid particle reduction performance between two existing solid contact clarifiers. This study compares their turbidity reduction efficiencies and discusses treatment characteristics of these clarifiers. The clarifiers feature circular basins with a dual layer of baffles and different internal mixing agitation. The first clarifier (CLR47) has the inner baffle as a truncated polygon with a lateral inlet. The second clarifier (CLR89) has a 30-degree tangential inlet attached to a small circular inner baffle. The Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) computational method was employed for fluid flow computation. Particles with 13 different diameter sizes ranged from 20 μm to 850 μm were accounted for suspended solid modeling via discrete phase model (DPM). The numerical model presents the overall solid settling efficiency as 46 % and 78 % for CLR47 and CLR89 respectively. The low recirculation within the mixing region and effluent high contamination of 20 μm size class particles of design CLR89 were noticed. While the CLR47 model has greater turbidity reduction despite greater maintain mixing efficiency for a higher flocculation rate expectation.
点阵玻尔兹曼法在澄清水中固体颗粒还原的数值模拟
水中的悬浮物对发电厂的生产是有害的。现场浊度监测的统计数据表明,两种现有固体接触澄清剂的固体颗粒还原性能不同。本研究比较了它们的降浊效果,并讨论了这些澄清剂的处理特性。澄清池具有双层挡板和不同内部混合搅拌的圆形池。第一澄清器(CLR47)的内挡板为截断多边形,具有侧入口。第二个澄清池(CLR89)有一个30度切向入口,连接到一个小的圆形内挡板。流体流动计算采用晶格玻尔兹曼法(LBM)计算方法。采用离散相模型(DPM)对直径为20 ~ 850 μm的13种不同粒径颗粒进行了悬浮固体建模。数值模型表明,CLR47和CLR89的整体固体沉降效率分别为46 %和78 %。注意到设计CLR89的20 μm级颗粒在混合区内的低再循环和出水的高污染。而CLR47模型具有更大的浊度降低,尽管维持混合效率更高,絮凝率期望更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信