Component-level energy consumption and range analysis of battery electric vehicles under urban and highway driving conditions

IF 6.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jigu Seo
{"title":"Component-level energy consumption and range analysis of battery electric vehicles under urban and highway driving conditions","authors":"Jigu Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.126797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a simulation-based analysis of energy consumption in a battery electric vehicle (BEV) under urban and highway driving conditions, focusing on component-level power flow and subsystem contributions. The simulation accounts for battery output and recovery, motor operation, driveline losses, and auxiliary loads to evaluate energy distribution and efficiency. Urban driving enables substantial regenerative braking, recovering up to 30.0 % of battery energy due to frequent deceleration, while highway driving leads to a 25.4 % increase in energy consumption, primarily due to aerodynamic drag. A parametric study quantifies the effects of key vehicle parameters on energy consumption. Reducing vehicle weight by 15.2 % (300  kg) decreases energy consumption by 6.6 % in urban and 2.2 % in highway driving. In contrast, lowering aerodynamic drag by 15 % results in reductions of 6.0 % and 11.5 %, respectively. These findings indicate that vehicle weight has a greater impact under stop-and-go urban conditions, whereas aerodynamic drag dominates during highway driving. Enhancing motor and driveline efficiency reduces energy conversion losses under both driving conditions to a comparable degree. Meanwhile, increased auxiliary load, particularly under extremely low ambient temperatures with heater use, raises urban energy consumption by up to 90.4 %, and a reduced regenerative braking efficiency limits energy recovery and further degrades efficiency. These results offer insights into subsystem-level energy behavior in BEVs, providing guidance for optimized component design and energy management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"274 ","pages":"Article 126797"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431125013894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a simulation-based analysis of energy consumption in a battery electric vehicle (BEV) under urban and highway driving conditions, focusing on component-level power flow and subsystem contributions. The simulation accounts for battery output and recovery, motor operation, driveline losses, and auxiliary loads to evaluate energy distribution and efficiency. Urban driving enables substantial regenerative braking, recovering up to 30.0 % of battery energy due to frequent deceleration, while highway driving leads to a 25.4 % increase in energy consumption, primarily due to aerodynamic drag. A parametric study quantifies the effects of key vehicle parameters on energy consumption. Reducing vehicle weight by 15.2 % (300  kg) decreases energy consumption by 6.6 % in urban and 2.2 % in highway driving. In contrast, lowering aerodynamic drag by 15 % results in reductions of 6.0 % and 11.5 %, respectively. These findings indicate that vehicle weight has a greater impact under stop-and-go urban conditions, whereas aerodynamic drag dominates during highway driving. Enhancing motor and driveline efficiency reduces energy conversion losses under both driving conditions to a comparable degree. Meanwhile, increased auxiliary load, particularly under extremely low ambient temperatures with heater use, raises urban energy consumption by up to 90.4 %, and a reduced regenerative braking efficiency limits energy recovery and further degrades efficiency. These results offer insights into subsystem-level energy behavior in BEVs, providing guidance for optimized component design and energy management strategies.
纯电动汽车在城市和公路工况下的部件级能耗和续航里程分析
本研究对纯电动汽车(BEV)在城市和高速公路行驶条件下的能耗进行了仿真分析,重点关注组件级功率流和子系统的贡献。模拟计算了电池输出和回收、电机运行、传动系统损耗和辅助负载,以评估能量分配和效率。城市驾驶可以实现大量的再生制动,由于频繁减速,可回收高达30.0%的电池能量,而高速公路驾驶导致能源消耗增加25.4%,主要是由于空气动力阻力。一项参数化研究量化了车辆关键参数对能耗的影响。将车辆重量减少15.2%(300公斤),可使城市行驶能耗降低6.6%,高速公路行驶能耗降低2.2%。相比之下,将气动阻力降低15%,则分别减少6.0%和11.5%。这些结果表明,在走走停停的城市条件下,车辆重量的影响更大,而在高速公路行驶时,气动阻力占主导地位。提高电机和传动系统的效率,在两种驾驶条件下减少能量转换损失的程度相当。与此同时,辅助负荷的增加,特别是在使用加热器的极低环境温度下,使城市能耗增加了90.4%,而再生制动效率的降低限制了能量回收,进一步降低了效率。这些结果为纯电动汽车的子系统能量行为提供了见解,为优化组件设计和能源管理策略提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Thermal Engineering
Applied Thermal Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1474
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application. The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信