Md Jamil Ahsan, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Ahmed S. Abdelrahman
{"title":"Can mid-block pedestrian signals (MPS) provide greater safety benefits than other mid-block pedestrian crossings?","authors":"Md Jamil Ahsan, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Ahmed S. Abdelrahman","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has recently implemented a new midblock signal system known as the Midblock Pedestrian Signal (MPS) to enhance pedestrian safety. This study evaluates the effectiveness of MPSs by comparing their safety performance with other existing midblock crossing treatments. Portable CCTV video data were collected from 14 MPS equipped locations, in addition to five reference sites, to calculate Conflict Modification Factors (CoMFs) using vehicle–pedestrian conflict data. Advanced computer vision techniques, specifically the RT-DETR model for object detection and the ByteTrack algorithm for tracking were utilized to process the video data. The study employed both Cross-Sectional (CS) and Before-After methods, incorporating the Comparison Group (CG) and Empirical Bayesian (EB) approaches to evaluate the safety impacts of MPSs. To address repeated observations at the same locations and minimize bias, Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) were developed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with a Negative Binomial distribution, which proved more robust than traditional Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). The results demonstrate that MPS systems outperform Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and Flashing Beacons in reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. Furthermore, when compared to Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHBs) which share similar functionalities but differ in signal phase management—MPS systems provided additional safety benefits. Compared to PHBs, MPS systems reduced serious and all conflicts by between 26–33% and 31–33%, respectively, using the EB, CG and the CS methods. These reductions highlight the superior safety performance of MPS systems compared to PHBs and other midblock crossing treatments. With their adaptability, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced safety benefits, MPS systems are a promising alternative for upgrading existing pedestrian crossings or installing new signal systems to improve pedestrian safety at midblock locations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 108105"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has recently implemented a new midblock signal system known as the Midblock Pedestrian Signal (MPS) to enhance pedestrian safety. This study evaluates the effectiveness of MPSs by comparing their safety performance with other existing midblock crossing treatments. Portable CCTV video data were collected from 14 MPS equipped locations, in addition to five reference sites, to calculate Conflict Modification Factors (CoMFs) using vehicle–pedestrian conflict data. Advanced computer vision techniques, specifically the RT-DETR model for object detection and the ByteTrack algorithm for tracking were utilized to process the video data. The study employed both Cross-Sectional (CS) and Before-After methods, incorporating the Comparison Group (CG) and Empirical Bayesian (EB) approaches to evaluate the safety impacts of MPSs. To address repeated observations at the same locations and minimize bias, Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) were developed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with a Negative Binomial distribution, which proved more robust than traditional Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). The results demonstrate that MPS systems outperform Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and Flashing Beacons in reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. Furthermore, when compared to Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHBs) which share similar functionalities but differ in signal phase management—MPS systems provided additional safety benefits. Compared to PHBs, MPS systems reduced serious and all conflicts by between 26–33% and 31–33%, respectively, using the EB, CG and the CS methods. These reductions highlight the superior safety performance of MPS systems compared to PHBs and other midblock crossing treatments. With their adaptability, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced safety benefits, MPS systems are a promising alternative for upgrading existing pedestrian crossings or installing new signal systems to improve pedestrian safety at midblock locations.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.