Artificial intelligence chatbots as sources for patient education material on child abuse

Lily Nguyen , Viet Tran , Joy Li , Denise Baughn , Joseph Shotwell , Kimberly Gushanas , Sayyeda Hasan , Lisa Falls , Rocksheng Zhong
{"title":"Artificial intelligence chatbots as sources for patient education material on child abuse","authors":"Lily Nguyen ,&nbsp;Viet Tran ,&nbsp;Joy Li ,&nbsp;Denise Baughn ,&nbsp;Joseph Shotwell ,&nbsp;Kimberly Gushanas ,&nbsp;Sayyeda Hasan ,&nbsp;Lisa Falls ,&nbsp;Rocksheng Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The World Health Organization defines <strong>c</strong>hildhood maltreatment as any form of abuse or neglect affecting children under 18 years of age that can cause actual or potential harm. Child abuse is a form of interpersonal trauma that can critically impact neurodevelopment and increase the risk of developing psychiatric disorders. With the increasing power and accessibility of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models, patients may turn to these platforms as sources of medical information. To date, no studies have evaluated the use of AI in creating patient education materials in childhood maltreatment and the field of psychiatry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight questions on child abuse from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) were input into ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot. A team of child psychiatrists and a pediatric psychologist reviewed and scored the responses by NCTSN and each AI, assessing quality, understandability, and actionability. Secondary outcomes included misinformation, readability, word count, and top references.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis of 32 responses showed good quality (mean DISCERN score 51.7) and moderate understandability (mean PEMAT 76.5 %). However, actionability was poor (mean PEMAT 64 %). Responses averaged a tenth-grade reading level, with ChatGPT being more difficult to read than NCTSN. AI-generated responses were significantly longer (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings of this study suggest that AI chatbots may currently be able to provide accurate, quality information on child abuse comparable to authoritative sources, albeit of significantly greater length. However, all sources lack actionability and exceed recommended reading levels, which limits effectiveness. These constraints suggest that AI chatbots should supplement rather than replace primary medical information sources. Urgent efforts are needed to improve the accessibility, readability, and actionability of patient education materials generated by AI and standardized sources on topics like child abuse and neglect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193825000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization defines childhood maltreatment as any form of abuse or neglect affecting children under 18 years of age that can cause actual or potential harm. Child abuse is a form of interpersonal trauma that can critically impact neurodevelopment and increase the risk of developing psychiatric disorders. With the increasing power and accessibility of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models, patients may turn to these platforms as sources of medical information. To date, no studies have evaluated the use of AI in creating patient education materials in childhood maltreatment and the field of psychiatry.

Methods

Eight questions on child abuse from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) were input into ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot. A team of child psychiatrists and a pediatric psychologist reviewed and scored the responses by NCTSN and each AI, assessing quality, understandability, and actionability. Secondary outcomes included misinformation, readability, word count, and top references.

Results

The analysis of 32 responses showed good quality (mean DISCERN score 51.7) and moderate understandability (mean PEMAT 76.5 %). However, actionability was poor (mean PEMAT 64 %). Responses averaged a tenth-grade reading level, with ChatGPT being more difficult to read than NCTSN. AI-generated responses were significantly longer (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Findings of this study suggest that AI chatbots may currently be able to provide accurate, quality information on child abuse comparable to authoritative sources, albeit of significantly greater length. However, all sources lack actionability and exceed recommended reading levels, which limits effectiveness. These constraints suggest that AI chatbots should supplement rather than replace primary medical information sources. Urgent efforts are needed to improve the accessibility, readability, and actionability of patient education materials generated by AI and standardized sources on topics like child abuse and neglect.
人工智能聊天机器人作为儿童虐待患者教育材料的来源
世界卫生组织将儿童虐待定义为对18岁以下儿童造成实际或潜在伤害的任何形式的虐待或忽视。虐待儿童是一种人际创伤,会严重影响神经发育,增加患精神疾病的风险。随着人工智能(AI)大型语言模型的日益强大和可访问性,患者可能会转向这些平台作为医疗信息的来源。迄今为止,还没有研究评估人工智能在创建儿童虐待和精神病学领域患者教育材料中的应用。方法将全国儿童创伤应激网络(NCTSN)中有关虐待儿童的8个问题输入ChatGPT、谷歌Gemini和Microsoft Copilot。一组儿童精神病学家和一名儿科心理学家对NCTSN和每个人工智能的回答进行了审查和评分,评估质量、可理解性和可操作性。次要结果包括错误信息、可读性、字数和热门参考文献。结果32份回复的质量较好(平均DISCERN评分51.7分),可理解性中等(平均PEMAT评分76.5%)。然而,可诉性较差(平均PEMAT为64%)。回答的平均阅读水平是十年级的水平,ChatGPT比NCTSN更难阅读。人工智能生成的回答明显更长(p <;0.001)。本研究的结果表明,人工智能聊天机器人目前可能能够提供与权威来源相当的关于儿童虐待的准确、高质量的信息,尽管篇幅要长得多。然而,所有的来源缺乏可操作性和超过推荐的阅读水平,这限制了有效性。这些限制表明,人工智能聊天机器人应该补充而不是取代主要的医疗信息来源。需要紧急努力提高人工智能和标准化来源生成的关于虐待和忽视儿童等主题的患者教育材料的可访问性、可读性和可操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信