Framing of innovation in urban Australian municipal climate policy

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Grace Rodgerson , Megan Farrelly , Rob Raven , Darren Sharp
{"title":"Framing of innovation in urban Australian municipal climate policy","authors":"Grace Rodgerson ,&nbsp;Megan Farrelly ,&nbsp;Rob Raven ,&nbsp;Darren Sharp","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing recognition of the importance of innovation in achieving net zero transitions, it remains unclear how to govern transformative innovation. Urban municipalities are consistently recognised for going above and beyond their state and national counterparts in their policy stances on climate change, yet there is limited investigation into how municipalities engage with and frame innovation in their decarbonisation policies, plans and strategies. In this study, we operationalise the three frames of innovation by Schot and Steinmueller (2018) to investigate the positionality of urban Australian municipalities in their innovation trajectory. Through a discourse analysis exploring 116 policy documents across 101 urban Australian municipalities, we find that despite ambitious rhetoric around innovation and system change, there is little evidence of transformative innovation within the policy deliverables. This has significant repercussions on the feasibility of locally driven net zero transitions and the consistent championing of municipalities within the literature. We call for greater attention to municipalities within the transformative innovation literature and propose a capability uplift in the sector is required to facilitate locally driven net zero transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 104094"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing recognition of the importance of innovation in achieving net zero transitions, it remains unclear how to govern transformative innovation. Urban municipalities are consistently recognised for going above and beyond their state and national counterparts in their policy stances on climate change, yet there is limited investigation into how municipalities engage with and frame innovation in their decarbonisation policies, plans and strategies. In this study, we operationalise the three frames of innovation by Schot and Steinmueller (2018) to investigate the positionality of urban Australian municipalities in their innovation trajectory. Through a discourse analysis exploring 116 policy documents across 101 urban Australian municipalities, we find that despite ambitious rhetoric around innovation and system change, there is little evidence of transformative innovation within the policy deliverables. This has significant repercussions on the feasibility of locally driven net zero transitions and the consistent championing of municipalities within the literature. We call for greater attention to municipalities within the transformative innovation literature and propose a capability uplift in the sector is required to facilitate locally driven net zero transitions.
澳大利亚城市气候政策的创新框架
尽管人们越来越认识到创新对实现净零排放转型的重要性,但如何管理变革性创新仍不清楚。人们一直认为,城市市政当局在气候变化问题上的政策立场超越了州和国家的同行,但对市政当局如何在其脱碳政策、计划和战略中参与和构建创新的调查有限。在本研究中,我们运用了Schot和Steinmueller(2018)的三个创新框架来研究澳大利亚城市在其创新轨迹中的位置。通过对澳大利亚101个城市的116份政策文件的话语分析,我们发现,尽管围绕创新和制度变革的言论雄心勃勃,但在政策可交付成果中几乎没有变革性创新的证据。这对地方驱动的净零转型的可行性和文献中市政当局的一贯支持产生了重大影响。我们呼吁在变革性创新文献中更多地关注市政当局,并提出需要提高该部门的能力,以促进地方驱动的净零转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信