Computer vision analysis of luteal color Doppler ultrasonography for early and automated pregnancy diagnosis in Bos taurus beef cows

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
L M Goncalves, P L P Fontes, A A C Alves
{"title":"Computer vision analysis of luteal color Doppler ultrasonography for early and automated pregnancy diagnosis in Bos taurus beef cows","authors":"L M Goncalves, P L P Fontes, A A C Alves","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the suitability of applying supervised deep learning (DL) algorithms for early and real-time pregnancy diagnosis in beef cattle using luteal color Doppler (CD) ultrasonography recorded on days 20 (D20) and 22 (D22) after fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). CD ultrasound videos from 390 females were manually evaluated by trained personnel to perform the human-based pregnancy diagnosis (Human). Images were extracted at a rate of 5 frames per second from each video, resulting in 10,533 (D20) and 10,413 (D22) valid frames after applying a frame-filtering pipeline. Three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures—VGG19, Xception, and ResNet50—along with their averaged inference (Combined), were evaluated using restricted five-fold cross-validation, ensuring that images from the same animal did not appear in both training and validation sets. Final inferences for each animal were determined by averaging the network outputs across all video frames. Pregnancy status was confirmed on day 29 using conventional ultrasonography and treated as ground truth for assessing both Human and DL-based predictions. Accuracy levels were similar across methods, ranging from 0.84 (VGG19) to 0.87 (Human) for D20 and from 0.86 (VGG19) to 0.93 (Human) for D22. Based on Matthew’s correlation coefficient, the Combined and Xception architectures demonstrated the best overall agreement with true pregnancy status among DL models. These architectures performed comparably to human diagnosis, with the Combined model achieving similar F1 scores (0.89 vs. 0.91), higher specificity (0.72 vs. 0.65), and slightly lower sensitivity (0.95 vs. 1.00) on D20. Xception showed similar performance to human diagnosis on D22, with comparable accuracy (0.91 vs. 0.93), specificity (0.79 vs. 0.81), sensitivity (0.99 vs. 1.00), and F1 score (0.93 vs. 0.94). In conclusion, DL algorithms can effectively predict pregnancy status using CD ultrasonography earlier than industry-standard methods, with performance comparable to that of trained personnel.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the suitability of applying supervised deep learning (DL) algorithms for early and real-time pregnancy diagnosis in beef cattle using luteal color Doppler (CD) ultrasonography recorded on days 20 (D20) and 22 (D22) after fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). CD ultrasound videos from 390 females were manually evaluated by trained personnel to perform the human-based pregnancy diagnosis (Human). Images were extracted at a rate of 5 frames per second from each video, resulting in 10,533 (D20) and 10,413 (D22) valid frames after applying a frame-filtering pipeline. Three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures—VGG19, Xception, and ResNet50—along with their averaged inference (Combined), were evaluated using restricted five-fold cross-validation, ensuring that images from the same animal did not appear in both training and validation sets. Final inferences for each animal were determined by averaging the network outputs across all video frames. Pregnancy status was confirmed on day 29 using conventional ultrasonography and treated as ground truth for assessing both Human and DL-based predictions. Accuracy levels were similar across methods, ranging from 0.84 (VGG19) to 0.87 (Human) for D20 and from 0.86 (VGG19) to 0.93 (Human) for D22. Based on Matthew’s correlation coefficient, the Combined and Xception architectures demonstrated the best overall agreement with true pregnancy status among DL models. These architectures performed comparably to human diagnosis, with the Combined model achieving similar F1 scores (0.89 vs. 0.91), higher specificity (0.72 vs. 0.65), and slightly lower sensitivity (0.95 vs. 1.00) on D20. Xception showed similar performance to human diagnosis on D22, with comparable accuracy (0.91 vs. 0.93), specificity (0.79 vs. 0.81), sensitivity (0.99 vs. 1.00), and F1 score (0.93 vs. 0.94). In conclusion, DL algorithms can effectively predict pregnancy status using CD ultrasonography earlier than industry-standard methods, with performance comparable to that of trained personnel.
黄体彩色多普勒超声对牛牛妊娠早期和自动诊断的计算机视觉分析
本研究利用固定时间人工授精(FTAI)后第20天(D20)和第22天(D22)黄体彩色多普勒(CD)超声记录,评估了将有监督深度学习(DL)算法应用于肉牛早期和实时妊娠诊断的适用性。390名女性的CD超声视频由训练有素的人员进行人工评估,以进行基于人的妊娠诊断(Human)。以每秒5帧的速率从每个视频中提取图像,应用帧滤波管道后得到10,533 (D20)和10,413 (D22)有效帧。三种卷积神经网络(CNN)架构——vgg19、Xception和resnet50——以及它们的平均推理(组合),使用受限的五倍交叉验证进行评估,确保来自同一动物的图像不会出现在训练集和验证集中。通过对所有视频帧的网络输出进行平均来确定每种动物的最终推断。在第29天使用常规超声检查确认妊娠状态,并将其作为评估人类和dl预测的基础事实。不同方法的准确度水平相似,D20的准确度范围为0.84 (VGG19)至0.87 (Human), D22的准确度范围为0.86 (VGG19)至0.93 (Human)。基于马修的相关系数,结合和异常架构在DL模型中显示出与真实妊娠状态的最佳总体一致性。这些架构的表现与人类诊断相当,联合模型在D20上获得相似的F1评分(0.89比0.91),更高的特异性(0.72比0.65),略低的敏感性(0.95比1.00)。Xception对D22的诊断表现与人类相似,具有相当的准确性(0.91比0.93)、特异性(0.79比0.81)、敏感性(0.99比1.00)和F1评分(0.93比0.94)。综上所述,DL算法可以比行业标准方法更早地使用CD超声有效预测妊娠状态,其性能与经过培训的人员相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信