The Effective Design of Tasks Involving Learning by Drawing: Current Trends and Methodological Progress in Research on Drawing to Learn

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Theresa Dechamps, Alexander Skulmowski
{"title":"The Effective Design of Tasks Involving Learning by Drawing: Current Trends and Methodological Progress in Research on Drawing to Learn","authors":"Theresa Dechamps, Alexander Skulmowski","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10026-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The generative learning strategy of learning by drawing has received increased attention in recent years. Although this strategy is regularly used by educators, the literature suggests that the effectiveness of the method depends on several factors. In this review, we highlight recent research trends and methodological progress within the field. Although recent developments have led to clearer and more comparable results, many current studies still revealed contradicting results in terms of the efficacy and boundary conditions of the learning strategy. In terms of study designs and the targeted types of knowledge, a trend towards digital drawing studies and a growing variety regarding the content domains of the investigated learning tasks can be observed. Based on the fact that results between different studies are often difficult to compare, we argue to more clearly differentiate visualizations and standardize the terminology for visualizations utilized in learning-oriented drawing tasks. As the properties of visualizations can cause varying cognitive demands on learners, differences in the level of skill required to produce different types of drawings, among other factors and learner variables, can affect the outcomes of this teaching method. Based on our review, we discuss practical and ethical implications as well as considerations for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10026-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The generative learning strategy of learning by drawing has received increased attention in recent years. Although this strategy is regularly used by educators, the literature suggests that the effectiveness of the method depends on several factors. In this review, we highlight recent research trends and methodological progress within the field. Although recent developments have led to clearer and more comparable results, many current studies still revealed contradicting results in terms of the efficacy and boundary conditions of the learning strategy. In terms of study designs and the targeted types of knowledge, a trend towards digital drawing studies and a growing variety regarding the content domains of the investigated learning tasks can be observed. Based on the fact that results between different studies are often difficult to compare, we argue to more clearly differentiate visualizations and standardize the terminology for visualizations utilized in learning-oriented drawing tasks. As the properties of visualizations can cause varying cognitive demands on learners, differences in the level of skill required to produce different types of drawings, among other factors and learner variables, can affect the outcomes of this teaching method. Based on our review, we discuss practical and ethical implications as well as considerations for future research.

绘画学习任务的有效设计:绘画学习研究的当前趋势和方法进展
绘制学习的生成性学习策略近年来受到越来越多的关注。尽管教育工作者经常使用这种策略,但文献表明,这种方法的有效性取决于几个因素。在这篇综述中,我们重点介绍了该领域的最新研究趋势和方法进展。虽然最近的发展导致了更清晰和更具可比性的结果,但许多目前的研究仍然在学习策略的功效和边界条件方面揭示了相互矛盾的结果。在研究设计和目标知识类型方面,可以观察到数字绘图研究的趋势以及关于所调查学习任务的内容领域的日益多样化。基于不同研究之间的结果往往难以比较这一事实,我们认为应该更清楚地区分可视化,并规范面向学习的绘图任务中使用的可视化术语。由于可视化的特性会对学习者产生不同的认知需求,因此,制作不同类型的图形所需的技能水平的差异,以及其他因素和学习者变量,都会影响这种教学方法的效果。基于我们的回顾,我们讨论了现实和伦理意义以及对未来研究的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信