Efficacy of targeting high mean arterial pressure for older patients with septic shock (OPTPRESS): a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Akira Endo, Kazuma Yamakawa, Takashi Tagami, Yutaka Umemura, Takeshi Wada, Ryo Yamamoto, Hiroki Nagasawa, Wataru Takayama, Masayuki Yagi, Kyosuke Takahashi, Mitsuaki Kojima, Chihiro Narita, Satoshi Kazuma, Jiro Takahashi, Atsushi Shiraishi, Masaki Todani, Masaki Nakane, Toshihiko Nagata, Shohei Tanaka, Yuta Yokokawa, Kunihiko Takahashi, Haruka Ishikita, Ryo Hisamune, Junichi Sasaki, Ken-ichi Muramatsu, Hiroyuki Sonobe, Kazunobu Minami, Hiromasa Hoshi, Yasuhiro Otomo
{"title":"Efficacy of targeting high mean arterial pressure for older patients with septic shock (OPTPRESS): a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial","authors":"Akira Endo, Kazuma Yamakawa, Takashi Tagami, Yutaka Umemura, Takeshi Wada, Ryo Yamamoto, Hiroki Nagasawa, Wataru Takayama, Masayuki Yagi, Kyosuke Takahashi, Mitsuaki Kojima, Chihiro Narita, Satoshi Kazuma, Jiro Takahashi, Atsushi Shiraishi, Masaki Todani, Masaki Nakane, Toshihiko Nagata, Shohei Tanaka, Yuta Yokokawa, Kunihiko Takahashi, Haruka Ishikita, Ryo Hisamune, Junichi Sasaki, Ken-ichi Muramatsu, Hiroyuki Sonobe, Kazunobu Minami, Hiromasa Hoshi, Yasuhiro Otomo","doi":"10.1007/s00134-025-07910-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>We examined the effect of a high-target mean arterial pressure (MAP) on septic shock in a previously underrepresented region.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 29 hospitals in Japan, where the prevalence of chronic hypertension among older individuals is 66.9%. Patients who were diagnosed with septic shock, aged ≥ 65 years, and admitted to an intensive care unit were randomised 1:1 to the high (target MAP = 80–85 mmHg) or control (target MAP = 65–70 mmHg) groups from 1 July 2021 to 12 December 2023. The target MAP was maintained for 72 h or until vasopressors were no longer required. The primary outcome was the 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ support-free days and adverse events.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The trial was terminated early on the basis of the interim analysis results, suggesting the harm of the high-target strategy. Of the 518 patients, 258 were in the high-target group, and 260 were in the control group. By 90 days after randomisation, 101 patients (39.3%) in the high-target group and 74 (28.6%) in the control group had died from any cause (risk difference = 10.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.6–18.9). Renal replacement therapy-free days at 28 days were shorter in the high-target group. No clinical benefits for any outcome were observed in any subpopulation, including those with known chronic hypertension.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Among older patients with septic shock, high-target MAP significantly increased mortality compared with standard care.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000041775; 13 September 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07910-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We examined the effect of a high-target mean arterial pressure (MAP) on septic shock in a previously underrepresented region.

Methods

A multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 29 hospitals in Japan, where the prevalence of chronic hypertension among older individuals is 66.9%. Patients who were diagnosed with septic shock, aged ≥ 65 years, and admitted to an intensive care unit were randomised 1:1 to the high (target MAP = 80–85 mmHg) or control (target MAP = 65–70 mmHg) groups from 1 July 2021 to 12 December 2023. The target MAP was maintained for 72 h or until vasopressors were no longer required. The primary outcome was the 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ support-free days and adverse events.

Results

The trial was terminated early on the basis of the interim analysis results, suggesting the harm of the high-target strategy. Of the 518 patients, 258 were in the high-target group, and 260 were in the control group. By 90 days after randomisation, 101 patients (39.3%) in the high-target group and 74 (28.6%) in the control group had died from any cause (risk difference = 10.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.6–18.9). Renal replacement therapy-free days at 28 days were shorter in the high-target group. No clinical benefits for any outcome were observed in any subpopulation, including those with known chronic hypertension.

Conclusion

Among older patients with septic shock, high-target MAP significantly increased mortality compared with standard care.

Trial registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000041775; 13 September 2020.

Abstract Image

针对高龄脓毒性休克患者高平均动脉压的疗效(OPTPRESS):一项多中心、实用、开放标签、随机对照试验
目的:我们研究了高目标平均动脉压(MAP)对脓毒性休克的影响。方法在日本29家医院进行了一项多中心、务实、开放标签、随机对照试验,其中老年人慢性高血压患病率为66.9%。在2021年7月1日至2023年12月12日期间,诊断为感染性休克、年龄≥65岁并入住重症监护病房的患者按1:1随机分为高组(目标MAP = 80-85 mmHg)或对照组(目标MAP = 65 - 70 mmHg)。目标MAP维持72小时或直到不再需要血管加压药。主要终点为90天全因死亡率。次要结局包括无器官支持天数和不良事件。结果根据中期分析结果,试验提前终止,提示高目标策略的危害。518例患者中,高靶组258例,对照组260例。随机分组后90天,高靶组101例(39.3%)患者和对照组74例(28.6%)患者死于任何原因(风险差= 10.7;95%置信区间为2.6-18.9)。高靶组28天无肾替代治疗天数较短。在任何亚人群中,包括已知的慢性高血压患者,均未观察到任何结果的临床益处。结论在老年感染性休克患者中,与标准治疗相比,高靶点MAP显著增加了死亡率。临床试验注册;UMIN000041775;2020年9月13日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信