Ilse Visser, Malindi van der Mheen, Hannah Dorsman, Rik Knipschild, Janneke Staaks, Irma Hein, Noah van Dongen, Wouter Staal, Mark Assink, Ramón J. L. Lindauer
{"title":"Post-traumatic stress disorder rates in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: updated three-level meta-analysis","authors":"Ilse Visser, Malindi van der Mheen, Hannah Dorsman, Rik Knipschild, Janneke Staaks, Irma Hein, Noah van Dongen, Wouter Staal, Mark Assink, Ramón J. L. Lindauer","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>In the past decade, no meta-analytical estimates of the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among children and adolescents have been published, despite a host of new prevalence studies and updated DSM-5 criteria.</p><span>Aims</span><p>We set out to estimate the prevalence rates of PTSD in trauma-exposed children and adolescents on the basis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria, and investigate differences in prevalence across trauma type, gender, time since exposure, type of informant and diagnostic measures.</p><span>Method</span><p>Studies identified in a previous meta-analysis were combined with more recent studies retrieved in a new systematic literature search, resulting in a total of 95 studies describing 64 independent samples (<span>n</span> = 6745 for DSM-IV, <span>n</span> = 12 644 for DSM-5) over a 30-year period. Three-level random-effects models were used to estimate prevalence for DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria separately, and for testing coded variables as moderators.</p><span>Results</span><p>The DSM-IV meta-analysis estimated a PTSD prevalence of 20.3% (95% CI 14.9–26.2%) using 56 samples with age range 0–18 years, and revealed moderating effects of gender, trauma type and diagnostic interview type. The DSM-5 meta-analysis found an overall prevalence of 12.0% (95% CI 3.7–24.2%) using eight samples with age range 1–18 years. There was insufficient data for moderation analyses.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Although most trauma-exposed children and adolescents do not develop PTSD, a significant proportion (20% under DSM-IV criteria and 12% under DSM-5 criteria) do, particularly girls and individuals exposed to interpersonal trauma. These findings highlight the urgent need of continuous efforts in prevention, early trauma-related screening, and effective diagnostics and treatment to address the substantial burden of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In the past decade, no meta-analytical estimates of the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among children and adolescents have been published, despite a host of new prevalence studies and updated DSM-5 criteria.
Aims
We set out to estimate the prevalence rates of PTSD in trauma-exposed children and adolescents on the basis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria, and investigate differences in prevalence across trauma type, gender, time since exposure, type of informant and diagnostic measures.
Method
Studies identified in a previous meta-analysis were combined with more recent studies retrieved in a new systematic literature search, resulting in a total of 95 studies describing 64 independent samples (n = 6745 for DSM-IV, n = 12 644 for DSM-5) over a 30-year period. Three-level random-effects models were used to estimate prevalence for DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria separately, and for testing coded variables as moderators.
Results
The DSM-IV meta-analysis estimated a PTSD prevalence of 20.3% (95% CI 14.9–26.2%) using 56 samples with age range 0–18 years, and revealed moderating effects of gender, trauma type and diagnostic interview type. The DSM-5 meta-analysis found an overall prevalence of 12.0% (95% CI 3.7–24.2%) using eight samples with age range 1–18 years. There was insufficient data for moderation analyses.
Conclusions
Although most trauma-exposed children and adolescents do not develop PTSD, a significant proportion (20% under DSM-IV criteria and 12% under DSM-5 criteria) do, particularly girls and individuals exposed to interpersonal trauma. These findings highlight the urgent need of continuous efforts in prevention, early trauma-related screening, and effective diagnostics and treatment to address the substantial burden of PTSD.