Post-traumatic stress disorder rates in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: updated three-level meta-analysis

Ilse Visser, Malindi van der Mheen, Hannah Dorsman, Rik Knipschild, Janneke Staaks, Irma Hein, Noah van Dongen, Wouter Staal, Mark Assink, Ramón J. L. Lindauer
{"title":"Post-traumatic stress disorder rates in trauma-exposed children and adolescents: updated three-level meta-analysis","authors":"Ilse Visser, Malindi van der Mheen, Hannah Dorsman, Rik Knipschild, Janneke Staaks, Irma Hein, Noah van Dongen, Wouter Staal, Mark Assink, Ramón J. L. Lindauer","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>In the past decade, no meta-analytical estimates of the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among children and adolescents have been published, despite a host of new prevalence studies and updated DSM-5 criteria.</p><span>Aims</span><p>We set out to estimate the prevalence rates of PTSD in trauma-exposed children and adolescents on the basis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria, and investigate differences in prevalence across trauma type, gender, time since exposure, type of informant and diagnostic measures.</p><span>Method</span><p>Studies identified in a previous meta-analysis were combined with more recent studies retrieved in a new systematic literature search, resulting in a total of 95 studies describing 64 independent samples (<span>n</span> = 6745 for DSM-IV, <span>n</span> = 12 644 for DSM-5) over a 30-year period. Three-level random-effects models were used to estimate prevalence for DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria separately, and for testing coded variables as moderators.</p><span>Results</span><p>The DSM-IV meta-analysis estimated a PTSD prevalence of 20.3% (95% CI 14.9–26.2%) using 56 samples with age range 0–18 years, and revealed moderating effects of gender, trauma type and diagnostic interview type. The DSM-5 meta-analysis found an overall prevalence of 12.0% (95% CI 3.7–24.2%) using eight samples with age range 1–18 years. There was insufficient data for moderation analyses.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Although most trauma-exposed children and adolescents do not develop PTSD, a significant proportion (20% under DSM-IV criteria and 12% under DSM-5 criteria) do, particularly girls and individuals exposed to interpersonal trauma. These findings highlight the urgent need of continuous efforts in prevention, early trauma-related screening, and effective diagnostics and treatment to address the substantial burden of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the past decade, no meta-analytical estimates of the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among children and adolescents have been published, despite a host of new prevalence studies and updated DSM-5 criteria.

Aims

We set out to estimate the prevalence rates of PTSD in trauma-exposed children and adolescents on the basis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria, and investigate differences in prevalence across trauma type, gender, time since exposure, type of informant and diagnostic measures.

Method

Studies identified in a previous meta-analysis were combined with more recent studies retrieved in a new systematic literature search, resulting in a total of 95 studies describing 64 independent samples (n = 6745 for DSM-IV, n = 12 644 for DSM-5) over a 30-year period. Three-level random-effects models were used to estimate prevalence for DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria separately, and for testing coded variables as moderators.

Results

The DSM-IV meta-analysis estimated a PTSD prevalence of 20.3% (95% CI 14.9–26.2%) using 56 samples with age range 0–18 years, and revealed moderating effects of gender, trauma type and diagnostic interview type. The DSM-5 meta-analysis found an overall prevalence of 12.0% (95% CI 3.7–24.2%) using eight samples with age range 1–18 years. There was insufficient data for moderation analyses.

Conclusions

Although most trauma-exposed children and adolescents do not develop PTSD, a significant proportion (20% under DSM-IV criteria and 12% under DSM-5 criteria) do, particularly girls and individuals exposed to interpersonal trauma. These findings highlight the urgent need of continuous efforts in prevention, early trauma-related screening, and effective diagnostics and treatment to address the substantial burden of PTSD.

创伤暴露儿童和青少年的创伤后应激障碍率:更新的三水平荟萃分析
在过去的十年中,尽管有大量新的患病率研究和更新的DSM-5标准,但尚未发表关于儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患病率的元分析估计。目的根据DSM-IV和DSM-5的标准估计创伤暴露儿童和青少年中PTSD的患病率,并调查不同创伤类型、性别、暴露时间、信息提供者类型和诊断措施的患病率差异。方法将先前荟萃分析中确定的研究与新的系统文献检索中检索到的最新研究相结合,共获得95项研究,涉及64个独立样本(DSM-IV中n = 6745, DSM-5中n = 12644),时间跨度为30年。三水平随机效应模型分别用于估计DSM-IV和DSM-5标准的患病率,并用于测试编码变量作为调节因子。结果DSM-IV荟萃分析估计,年龄在0-18岁的56个样本中,PTSD患病率为20.3% (95% CI 14.9-26.2%),并揭示了性别、创伤类型和诊断访谈类型的调节作用。DSM-5荟萃分析发现,使用8个年龄范围为1-18岁的样本,总体患病率为12.0% (95% CI 3.7-24.2%)。没有足够的数据进行适度分析。结论虽然大多数创伤暴露的儿童和青少年不患PTSD,但有很大比例(按DSM-IV标准为20%,按DSM-5标准为12%)会发生PTSD,尤其是女孩和人际创伤暴露的个体。这些发现强调了迫切需要继续努力预防,早期创伤相关筛查,有效的诊断和治疗,以解决创伤后应激障碍的沉重负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信