Internal Water Movement and Residence Time Differ in Two Tree Species in a Temperate Deciduous Forest: Evidence From an In Situ D2O Isotope Tracer Study
Kevan J. Minick, Jennifer Bahramian, David Love, Lauren Tucker, Keith Reinhardt, Daniel M. Johnson, Ryan E. Emanuel
{"title":"Internal Water Movement and Residence Time Differ in Two Tree Species in a Temperate Deciduous Forest: Evidence From an In Situ D2O Isotope Tracer Study","authors":"Kevan J. Minick, Jennifer Bahramian, David Love, Lauren Tucker, Keith Reinhardt, Daniel M. Johnson, Ryan E. Emanuel","doi":"10.1002/eco.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To facilitate better predictive capabilities of hydrological fluxes in forested ecosystems, quantifying internal tree water movement at the tree species level is necessary. We measured short-term (daily) and long-term (weekly–monthly) water transport using isotopic breakthrough curves measured in real-time in tree species with different hydraulic anatomies (ring porous vs. tracheid). One gymnosperm species (loblolly pine; <i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) and one angiosperm species (southern red oak; <i>Quercus falcata</i>) were selected, which are common species across the Southeastern United States. Deuterated water (D<sub>2</sub>O) was injected into the base of four trees per species (eight trees total) and tracked radially (within xylem tissues) and axially (along tree trunks) for 45 days within tree trunks and leaf water. At three heights along the main trunk, boreholes were installed to isolate distinct xylem tissues: (1) shallow sapwood (SS W); (2) deep sapwood (DSW); and (3) heartwood (HW). Initially, both species showed tracer enrichment in SSW. Subsequent tracer movement showed that oaks retained more tracer in HW and for a longer period of time than pines. Arrival time of tracer peaks ranged from 1 to 13 days in oaks (maximum δ<sup>2</sup>H = −109 to +7291) and from 1 to 4 days in pines (maximum δ<sup>2</sup>H = +22 to +8831), while time to recovery to baseline δ<sup>2</sup>H concentrations generally ranged from 7 to 38 days in oaks and from 2 to 6 days in pines. Accordingly, tracer residence time tended to be longer for all tissue depths measured in the oak trunks (1–9 days) and leaves (9–18 days) compared with pines (trunk: 0.2–3 days; leaf: 5–8 days), while tracer travel velocity was higher in pines for the trunk in the SSW and HW (2.8–5.6 m day<sup>−1</sup>) compared with oaks (0.3–2.5 m day<sup>−1</sup>), but not when estimated at the leaf. Although sapwood and HW are hydraulically connected, the degree of connectivity varied between tree species. Results from this study open the door for more focused studies and a greater understanding of internal water movement within mature trees.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To facilitate better predictive capabilities of hydrological fluxes in forested ecosystems, quantifying internal tree water movement at the tree species level is necessary. We measured short-term (daily) and long-term (weekly–monthly) water transport using isotopic breakthrough curves measured in real-time in tree species with different hydraulic anatomies (ring porous vs. tracheid). One gymnosperm species (loblolly pine; Pinus taeda L.) and one angiosperm species (southern red oak; Quercus falcata) were selected, which are common species across the Southeastern United States. Deuterated water (D2O) was injected into the base of four trees per species (eight trees total) and tracked radially (within xylem tissues) and axially (along tree trunks) for 45 days within tree trunks and leaf water. At three heights along the main trunk, boreholes were installed to isolate distinct xylem tissues: (1) shallow sapwood (SS W); (2) deep sapwood (DSW); and (3) heartwood (HW). Initially, both species showed tracer enrichment in SSW. Subsequent tracer movement showed that oaks retained more tracer in HW and for a longer period of time than pines. Arrival time of tracer peaks ranged from 1 to 13 days in oaks (maximum δ2H = −109 to +7291) and from 1 to 4 days in pines (maximum δ2H = +22 to +8831), while time to recovery to baseline δ2H concentrations generally ranged from 7 to 38 days in oaks and from 2 to 6 days in pines. Accordingly, tracer residence time tended to be longer for all tissue depths measured in the oak trunks (1–9 days) and leaves (9–18 days) compared with pines (trunk: 0.2–3 days; leaf: 5–8 days), while tracer travel velocity was higher in pines for the trunk in the SSW and HW (2.8–5.6 m day−1) compared with oaks (0.3–2.5 m day−1), but not when estimated at the leaf. Although sapwood and HW are hydraulically connected, the degree of connectivity varied between tree species. Results from this study open the door for more focused studies and a greater understanding of internal water movement within mature trees.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.