Public attitudes toward dementia risk prediction: A mixed-methods study

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jacqueline J. Claus, Mathijs T. Rosbergen, Marije J. Splinter, Jolande van Heemst, M. Arfan Ikram, Meike W. Vernooij, Frank J. Wolters
{"title":"Public attitudes toward dementia risk prediction: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Jacqueline J. Claus,&nbsp;Mathijs T. Rosbergen,&nbsp;Marije J. Splinter,&nbsp;Jolande van Heemst,&nbsp;M. Arfan Ikram,&nbsp;Meike W. Vernooij,&nbsp;Frank J. Wolters","doi":"10.1002/alz.14615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Numerous dementia risk prediction models have been developed, but uptake in clinical practice is poor.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We determined public attitude toward dementia risk prediction through the means of a focus group (<i>n</i> = 9) and subsequent online survey (<i>n</i> = 687). Thematic content analysis was used for focus group data and descriptive statistics for survey responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Focus group participants expressed reluctance in knowing dementia risk due to fear, emotional burden, and belief that prevention was impossible. Conversely, practical benefits and maximizing present quality of life motivated others to know dementia risk. Of survey respondents, 66.1% would want to know their 10-year risk at present, increasing to 82.3% if preventive medication were available. People perceived their 10-year risk as rather high, yet lower still than their own personal threshold for considering preventive action.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Development and implementation of dementia risk prediction tools require attention for personal actionability and emotional impact of risk communication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Among citizens with a particular interest in dementia, a large group is keen to learn their personal dementia risk, particularly when effective preventive measures are available.</li>\n \n <li>In focus group participants, hesitancy to learn about dementia risk was common, driven by fear, emotional burden, and doubts about the effectiveness of preventive interventions.</li>\n \n <li>The majority of survey participants (72%) believed a healthy lifestyle could reduce dementia risk.</li>\n \n <li>People perceived their 10-year risk as rather high, yet lower still than their own personal threshold for considering preventive action.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.14615","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.14615","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Numerous dementia risk prediction models have been developed, but uptake in clinical practice is poor.

METHODS

We determined public attitude toward dementia risk prediction through the means of a focus group (n = 9) and subsequent online survey (n = 687). Thematic content analysis was used for focus group data and descriptive statistics for survey responses.

RESULTS

Focus group participants expressed reluctance in knowing dementia risk due to fear, emotional burden, and belief that prevention was impossible. Conversely, practical benefits and maximizing present quality of life motivated others to know dementia risk. Of survey respondents, 66.1% would want to know their 10-year risk at present, increasing to 82.3% if preventive medication were available. People perceived their 10-year risk as rather high, yet lower still than their own personal threshold for considering preventive action.

DISCUSSION

Development and implementation of dementia risk prediction tools require attention for personal actionability and emotional impact of risk communication.

Highlights

  • Among citizens with a particular interest in dementia, a large group is keen to learn their personal dementia risk, particularly when effective preventive measures are available.
  • In focus group participants, hesitancy to learn about dementia risk was common, driven by fear, emotional burden, and doubts about the effectiveness of preventive interventions.
  • The majority of survey participants (72%) believed a healthy lifestyle could reduce dementia risk.
  • People perceived their 10-year risk as rather high, yet lower still than their own personal threshold for considering preventive action.

Abstract Image

公众对痴呆风险预测的态度:一项混合方法研究
许多痴呆风险预测模型已经开发出来,但在临床实践中的吸收很差。方法通过焦点小组(n = 9)和随后的在线调查(n = 687),确定公众对痴呆风险预测的态度。焦点小组数据采用主题内容分析,调查答复采用描述性统计。结果:焦点小组参与者表示,由于恐惧、情绪负担和认为预防是不可能的,他们不愿意了解痴呆症的风险。相反,实际利益和最大限度地提高目前的生活质量促使其他人了解痴呆症的风险。在调查对象中,66.1%的人希望了解他们目前的10年风险,如果可以获得预防药物,这一比例将增加到82.3%。人们认为自己10年的患病风险相当高,但仍低于考虑采取预防措施的个人临界值。痴呆风险预测工具的开发和实施需要关注风险沟通的个人可操作性和情感影响。在对痴呆症特别感兴趣的公民中,有一大群人热衷于了解他们个人的痴呆症风险,特别是在有有效预防措施的情况下。在焦点小组参与者中,由于恐惧、情绪负担和对预防性干预措施有效性的怀疑,对了解痴呆症风险的犹豫很常见。大多数调查参与者(72%)认为健康的生活方式可以降低患痴呆症的风险。人们认为自己10年的患病风险相当高,但仍低于考虑采取预防措施的个人临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信