The Case of Sylvia Mahlangu—The Fight for Legislative Inclusion for Domestic Workers in South Africa

Thulani Nkosi, Nerishka Singh
{"title":"The Case of Sylvia Mahlangu—The Fight for Legislative Inclusion for Domestic Workers in South Africa","authors":"Thulani Nkosi,&nbsp;Nerishka Singh","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An estimated 800,000 domestic workers live and work in South Africa. Domestic work is an industry dominated by Black women who are often from marginalised backgrounds. It is one of the few sources of employment accessible to poor and low-income women not only in South Africa but around the world as well. The foundations of the sector were laid during the Apartheid era, which legislated racially discriminatory laws and normalised racially discriminatory beliefs and practices. This, combined with institutionalised and patriarchal values, which often diminish the economic value of domestic labour, has created overlapping forms of oppression that still are present in the lives of domestic workers today. Sylvia Mahlangu was one such domestic worker who, while cleaning the outside windows of her employer's house, fell into their uncovered pool and drowned. As the head of her household, her family and dependents were tasked with simultaneously grieving her death as well as seeking compensation for their lost access to income. For Black, South African workers, one wage must typically support four people (Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice Dignity Group, 2023: Household Affordability Index). This piece delineates the Constitutional challenge taken on by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (SERI) to include domestic workers in the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) 130 of 1993, the legislation which allows employees to claim compensation for injuries sustained during the course of their employment.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An estimated 800,000 domestic workers live and work in South Africa. Domestic work is an industry dominated by Black women who are often from marginalised backgrounds. It is one of the few sources of employment accessible to poor and low-income women not only in South Africa but around the world as well. The foundations of the sector were laid during the Apartheid era, which legislated racially discriminatory laws and normalised racially discriminatory beliefs and practices. This, combined with institutionalised and patriarchal values, which often diminish the economic value of domestic labour, has created overlapping forms of oppression that still are present in the lives of domestic workers today. Sylvia Mahlangu was one such domestic worker who, while cleaning the outside windows of her employer's house, fell into their uncovered pool and drowned. As the head of her household, her family and dependents were tasked with simultaneously grieving her death as well as seeking compensation for their lost access to income. For Black, South African workers, one wage must typically support four people (Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice Dignity Group, 2023: Household Affordability Index). This piece delineates the Constitutional challenge taken on by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (SERI) to include domestic workers in the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) 130 of 1993, the legislation which allows employees to claim compensation for injuries sustained during the course of their employment.

西尔维娅·马朗案——为南非家庭佣工争取立法包容的斗争
估计有80万家庭佣工在南非生活和工作。家务劳动是一个由黑人女性主导的行业,她们往往来自边缘背景。不仅在南非,而且在世界各地,它是贫穷和低收入妇女可以获得的少数就业来源之一。该部门的基础是在种族隔离时代奠定的,当时制定了种族歧视法律,使种族歧视的信仰和做法正常化。这一点,再加上制度化和父权制的价值观,往往会降低家务劳动的经济价值,造成了重叠形式的压迫,今天仍然存在于家务工人的生活中。西尔维娅·马兰古就是这样一个家庭佣工,她在打扫雇主家的窗户时,掉进了没有盖的游泳池淹死了。作为一家之主,她的家人和受抚养人的任务是同时哀悼她的死亡,并为他们失去的收入寻求赔偿。对于南非黑人工人来说,一份工资通常必须支持四个人(Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice Dignity Group, 2023年:家庭负担能力指数)。这篇文章描述了社会经济权利研究所(SERI)为将家庭佣工纳入1993年第130号《职业伤害和疾病赔偿法》(COIDA)所面临的宪法挑战,该法律允许雇员就其就业期间遭受的伤害要求赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信