Interacting effects of environment and cultivation method on biofouling of farmed oysters (Crassostrea virginica)

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Ruby Krasnow, Thomas Kiffney, Robert Cuddy, Damian C. Brady
{"title":"Interacting effects of environment and cultivation method on biofouling of farmed oysters (Crassostrea virginica)","authors":"Ruby Krasnow,&nbsp;Thomas Kiffney,&nbsp;Robert Cuddy,&nbsp;Damian C. Brady","doi":"10.1111/jwas.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biofouling-induced increases in labor costs are among the most impactful factors determining the technoeconomic feasibility and profitability of aquaculture operations. Understanding how different cultivation methods and environmental conditions influence the severity of biofouling is crucial to support informed decision-making by farmers and minimize the economic impacts of biofouling in the aquaculture industry. This study used a factorial design to compare the extent and type of biofouling across three common cultivation methods (floating bags, floating cages, and bottom-culture) in exposed and sheltered locations that differ in temperature, salinity, turbidity, and wave energy. The ratio of fouling weight to oyster wet weight for oysters grown in floating bags was significantly higher than for oysters grown in floating cages, which were in turn significantly more fouled than bottom-planted oysters. Oysters cultivated in the exposed location had a significantly higher fouling ratio than oysters cultivated in the sheltered location. However, this pattern was driven by the stark difference in fouling by location for the floating bags, indicating that differences in temperature and wave exposure between sites would have the greatest impact on fouling severity for oysters grown in floating bags. Common fouling organisms included solitary and colonial tunicates, filamentous algae, and hard fouling (mussels, oyster spat, and barnacles). The significant differences observed in the composition and severity of oyster biofouling by gear type and growing site underscore the importance of considering fouling potential when evaluating the profitability of a farming strategy and the need for further development of region- and gear-specific biofouling mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwas.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwas.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biofouling-induced increases in labor costs are among the most impactful factors determining the technoeconomic feasibility and profitability of aquaculture operations. Understanding how different cultivation methods and environmental conditions influence the severity of biofouling is crucial to support informed decision-making by farmers and minimize the economic impacts of biofouling in the aquaculture industry. This study used a factorial design to compare the extent and type of biofouling across three common cultivation methods (floating bags, floating cages, and bottom-culture) in exposed and sheltered locations that differ in temperature, salinity, turbidity, and wave energy. The ratio of fouling weight to oyster wet weight for oysters grown in floating bags was significantly higher than for oysters grown in floating cages, which were in turn significantly more fouled than bottom-planted oysters. Oysters cultivated in the exposed location had a significantly higher fouling ratio than oysters cultivated in the sheltered location. However, this pattern was driven by the stark difference in fouling by location for the floating bags, indicating that differences in temperature and wave exposure between sites would have the greatest impact on fouling severity for oysters grown in floating bags. Common fouling organisms included solitary and colonial tunicates, filamentous algae, and hard fouling (mussels, oyster spat, and barnacles). The significant differences observed in the composition and severity of oyster biofouling by gear type and growing site underscore the importance of considering fouling potential when evaluating the profitability of a farming strategy and the need for further development of region- and gear-specific biofouling mitigation strategies.

Abstract Image

环境与养殖方式对养殖牡蛎生物污染的交互作用
生物污染引起的劳动力成本增加是决定水产养殖业务技术经济可行性和盈利能力的最具影响力的因素之一。了解不同的养殖方法和环境条件如何影响生物污染的严重程度,对于支持农民做出明智的决策并最大限度地减少生物污染对水产养殖业的经济影响至关重要。本研究采用因子设计比较了三种常见的养殖方法(浮袋、浮笼和底培养)在暴露和遮蔽的环境下的生物污染程度和类型,这些环境在温度、盐度、浊度和波浪能方面存在差异。浮袋养殖牡蛎的污重与湿重之比显著高于浮笼养殖牡蛎,而浮笼养殖牡蛎的污重与湿重之比也显著高于底层养殖牡蛎。暴露地点养殖的牡蛎的污染率显著高于隐蔽地点养殖的牡蛎。然而,这种模式是由浮袋不同位置的污染差异所驱动的,这表明地点之间的温度和波浪暴露的差异将对浮袋中生长的牡蛎的污染程度产生最大的影响。常见的污染生物包括孤立的和群体的被囊动物、丝状藻类和硬污染生物(贻贝、牡蛎和藤壶)。牡蛎生物污染的组成和严重程度因渔具类型和养殖地点的不同而有显著差异,这强调了在评估养殖战略的盈利能力时考虑污染潜力的重要性,以及进一步制定针对特定区域和渔具的生物污染缓解战略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the World Aquaculture Society is an international scientific journal publishing original research on the culture of aquatic plants and animals including: Nutrition; Disease; Genetics and breeding; Physiology; Environmental quality; Culture systems engineering; Husbandry practices; Economics and marketing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信