Measuring outness in a national sample of sexual minority, gender minority, and sexual and gender minority youth

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
S. Henry Sherwood, Haoran Meng, Hirokazu Yoshikawa, Stephen T. Russell, Ryan J. Watson
{"title":"Measuring outness in a national sample of sexual minority, gender minority, and sexual and gender minority youth","authors":"S. Henry Sherwood,&nbsp;Haoran Meng,&nbsp;Hirokazu Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Stephen T. Russell,&nbsp;Ryan J. Watson","doi":"10.1111/jora.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although are several reliable measures used to assess outness levels, they were developed and validated for lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Using a national dataset of sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) ages 13–17 (<i>M</i> = 15.57, SD = 1.27), this study examined the psychometric properties of a new outness measure to assess its structure and validity. This data source is unique in that it allowed for strategic comparisons among three subpopulations: cisgender sexual minority youth (CSMY), youth with both sexual and gender minority identifications (SMGMY), and heterosexual gender minority youth (HGMY). Accordingly, this study examined the measurement invariance of a sexual minority (SM) outness measure to assess if the same latent constructs are measured when it is completed by CSMY and SMGMY (i.e., sexual identity outness), as well as a gender minority (GM) outness measure when completed by HGMY and SMGMY (i.e., gender identity outness). Factor analysis results reveal that the measure accurately assesses gender and sexual identity outness. Measurement invariance results confirm that comparisons can be made between CSMY and SMGMY as well as between HGMY and SMGMY. This analysis highlights an opportunity to improve how outness is assessed and how it may function differently between SM and GM communities and for youth compared to adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.70028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although are several reliable measures used to assess outness levels, they were developed and validated for lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Using a national dataset of sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) ages 13–17 (M = 15.57, SD = 1.27), this study examined the psychometric properties of a new outness measure to assess its structure and validity. This data source is unique in that it allowed for strategic comparisons among three subpopulations: cisgender sexual minority youth (CSMY), youth with both sexual and gender minority identifications (SMGMY), and heterosexual gender minority youth (HGMY). Accordingly, this study examined the measurement invariance of a sexual minority (SM) outness measure to assess if the same latent constructs are measured when it is completed by CSMY and SMGMY (i.e., sexual identity outness), as well as a gender minority (GM) outness measure when completed by HGMY and SMGMY (i.e., gender identity outness). Factor analysis results reveal that the measure accurately assesses gender and sexual identity outness. Measurement invariance results confirm that comparisons can be made between CSMY and SMGMY as well as between HGMY and SMGMY. This analysis highlights an opportunity to improve how outness is assessed and how it may function differently between SM and GM communities and for youth compared to adults.

测量性少数群体、性别少数群体、性少数群体和性别少数群体青年的国家样本的外向性
虽然有几种可靠的方法用于评估外出程度,但它们是针对女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋成年人开发和验证的。本研究利用13-17岁的性少数和性别少数青年(SGMY)的国家数据集(M = 15.57, SD = 1.27),检验了一种新的外向度测量方法的心理测量特性,以评估其结构和效度。该数据来源的独特之处在于,它允许在三个亚人群中进行战略比较:顺性别性少数青年(CSMY)、性少数和性别少数青年(SMGMY)和异性恋性少数青年(HGMY)。因此,本研究检验了性少数(SM)外向性测量的测量不变性,以评估由CSMY和SMGMY完成的隐性构念(即性别认同外向性),以及由HGMY和SMGMY完成的性别少数(GM)外向性(即性别认同外向性)是否具有相同的潜在构念。因子分析结果显示,该量表准确地评估了性别和性别认同的缺失。测量不变性结果证实了CSMY和SMGMY之间以及HGMY和SMGMY之间的可比性。这一分析强调了改善外出度评估方式的机会,以及它在SM和转基因社区之间以及青年与成人之间的作用可能有何不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信