Listening to Women's Voices: A Patient and Public Involvement Exercise Exploring Vulval Reconstructive Surgery for UK Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Juliet Albert, Janet Fyle, Njomeza Kartallozi, Christie Coho, Naana Otoo-Oyortey, Hekate Papadaki, Catrin Evans, Dalia Saidan, Sohier Elneil, Natasha Anderson-Foster, Jasmine Abdulcadir, Huda Mohamed, Aurora Almadori
{"title":"Listening to Women's Voices: A Patient and Public Involvement Exercise Exploring Vulval Reconstructive Surgery for UK Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)","authors":"Juliet Albert,&nbsp;Janet Fyle,&nbsp;Njomeza Kartallozi,&nbsp;Christie Coho,&nbsp;Naana Otoo-Oyortey,&nbsp;Hekate Papadaki,&nbsp;Catrin Evans,&nbsp;Dalia Saidan,&nbsp;Sohier Elneil,&nbsp;Natasha Anderson-Foster,&nbsp;Jasmine Abdulcadir,&nbsp;Huda Mohamed,&nbsp;Aurora Almadori","doi":"10.1111/hex.70275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This article presents patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work undertaken to explore FGM survivors' and stakeholders' views on reconstructive surgery, potential service models, care pathways, barriers to access and other support needs. The aim was to set research priorities, identify key themes and help inform subsequent research in the field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A national research collective was established comprising over 20 stakeholders, including FGM survivors/women with lived experience, healthcare professionals, academics and advocacy groups. The group undertook two discussion workshops with FGM survivors (<i>n</i> = 11 participants), two national stakeholder events (<i>n</i> = 142 attendees) and significant advocacy and partnership-building activities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Key insights were that FGM survivors would value reconstructive surgery to address body image concerns, genital pain and sexual difficulties. Potential barriers to surgery included stigma, safeguarding concerns, lack of awareness and fear. Significant gaps were identified around women's knowledge of clitoral anatomy, FGM types and specialist services. Survivors and stakeholders emphasised the need to complement surgical reconstruction with a comprehensive care pathway including trauma counselling and psychosexual therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the importance of a survivor-led approach to FGM service development, as often the voices of FGM survivors are not included. The exercise demonstrated that, with the right approach, it is possible to engage ‘minoritised communities/individuals from the global majority’ and communities dispayed considerable willingness to participate in this sensitive research field. It also emphasises an urgent need for accessible, high-quality FGM care informed by the voices of those affected, to improve outcomes and support for FGM survivors in the United Kingdom.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Women with lived experience of FGM and women from FGM-affected communities, as well as other national stakeholders (including Non Government Organisation's and charities working with FGM survivors, academics, artists and campaigners were involved in the design and conduct of this study, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70275","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This article presents patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work undertaken to explore FGM survivors' and stakeholders' views on reconstructive surgery, potential service models, care pathways, barriers to access and other support needs. The aim was to set research priorities, identify key themes and help inform subsequent research in the field.

Methods

A national research collective was established comprising over 20 stakeholders, including FGM survivors/women with lived experience, healthcare professionals, academics and advocacy groups. The group undertook two discussion workshops with FGM survivors (n = 11 participants), two national stakeholder events (n = 142 attendees) and significant advocacy and partnership-building activities.

Results

Key insights were that FGM survivors would value reconstructive surgery to address body image concerns, genital pain and sexual difficulties. Potential barriers to surgery included stigma, safeguarding concerns, lack of awareness and fear. Significant gaps were identified around women's knowledge of clitoral anatomy, FGM types and specialist services. Survivors and stakeholders emphasised the need to complement surgical reconstruction with a comprehensive care pathway including trauma counselling and psychosexual therapy.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of a survivor-led approach to FGM service development, as often the voices of FGM survivors are not included. The exercise demonstrated that, with the right approach, it is possible to engage ‘minoritised communities/individuals from the global majority’ and communities dispayed considerable willingness to participate in this sensitive research field. It also emphasises an urgent need for accessible, high-quality FGM care informed by the voices of those affected, to improve outcomes and support for FGM survivors in the United Kingdom.

Patient or Public Contribution

Women with lived experience of FGM and women from FGM-affected communities, as well as other national stakeholders (including Non Government Organisation's and charities working with FGM survivors, academics, artists and campaigners were involved in the design and conduct of this study, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript.

Abstract Image

倾听女性的声音:英国女性生殖器切割(FGM)患者和公众参与的外阴重建手术探索
本文介绍了患者和公众参与和参与(PPIE)的工作,旨在探讨女性生殖器切割幸存者和利益相关者对重建手术、潜在服务模式、护理途径、获取障碍和其他支持需求的看法。其目的是确定研究重点,确定关键主题,并为该领域的后续研究提供信息。方法建立了一个由20多个利益攸关方组成的国家研究小组,包括女性生殖器切割幸存者/有生活经历的妇女、保健专业人员、学者和倡导团体。该小组举办了两次与女性生殖器切割幸存者(11名参与者)的讨论会,两次国家利益攸关方活动(142名参与者)以及重要的宣传和建立伙伴关系活动。关键的见解是女性生殖器切割幸存者将重视重建手术,以解决身体形象问题,生殖器疼痛和性困难。手术的潜在障碍包括耻辱、安全问题、缺乏意识和恐惧。发现妇女在阴蒂解剖、切割女性生殖器类型和专科服务方面的知识存在重大差距。幸存者和利益相关者强调,需要通过包括创伤咨询和性心理治疗在内的综合护理途径来补充手术重建。本研究强调了幸存者主导的女性生殖器切割服务发展方法的重要性,因为女性生殖器切割幸存者的声音往往没有被包括在内。实践表明,通过正确的方法,可以让“全球多数群体中的少数群体/个人”参与进来,社区也表现出相当大的意愿,愿意参与这一敏感的研究领域。报告还强调,迫切需要根据受影响者的声音提供可获得的高质量女性生殖器切割护理,以改善英国女性生殖器切割幸存者的结果和支持。有过女性生殖器切割经历的妇女和受女性生殖器切割影响社区的妇女,以及其他国家利益相关者(包括与女性生殖器切割幸存者合作的非政府组织和慈善机构、学者、艺术家和活动家)参与了这项研究的设计和实施、数据的分析和解释以及手稿的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信